UST Nobby Nics and ...
 

[Closed] UST Nobby Nics and UST Racing Ralph...

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am going to be running the RR on the rear and the NN on the front both in UST 2.1 on a lightweight hardtail with Stans sealant.

Good combination for most things? Where will this combination not be any good?

Will be running a different bike with Bonty Mud Xs when it gets uber gloopy so mud is not an issue.

Any advice appreciated. 🙂


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 193
Free Member
 

Personally I would run NN both ends - it will look like an RR after a few weeks anyhow


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

got NN UST both ends on the klein

seem very capable in most conditions


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run 2.25 UST NNs F & R and they roll really well. UST sidewalls are really thick, so you can run stupid low pressures if you want, plus you won't get slashed sidewalls.


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:16 pm
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

NN both ends. Cant fault them really. RR for hard pack trail/dry summer/Alp or Spain rock type trails. NN cope better with softer wetter ground. IMO of course.... but at £45 each at the LBS its an expensive job. Chain Reaction or Wiggle may be better...


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm running (standard) NNs front and rear, tubeless on 355s. They seem to be fine so far.


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 2877
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2.25's here, got 2 years of part time use out of them in all conditions, best tyres ive ever used.


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:50 pm
Posts: 511
Free Member
 

Totally useless on a wet Lakes ride round Burnmoor Tarn a few weeks back. Racing Ralphs are exactly that - for racing.


 
Posted : 28/09/2009 9:52 pm