Forum search & shortcuts

Surly Pugsley. Any ...
 

[Closed] Surly Pugsley. Any good when the snow has gone ???

 gil_
Posts: 259
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]
Loving mine at the moment but almost too much snow on the open ground, think I have found the limit of riding around 24" of powder

Now running an SC32 on the front, works great in the dryer conditions and stops that "unbalanced" pull to one side when you get it up to speed

Buy one now you won't regret it 🙂


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Heres an Album of various makes of fat bikes ive collected over a couple of years, its on photo bucket so can be viewed as a slideshow.
Lots of makes as you can see and a few on off`s,
King of the fatbike porn must be the moots bikes!,

[url= http://s399.photobucket.com/albums/pp77/coastkid71/fatbikes/ ]Fat Bike Gallery[/url]


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 12:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So close or ordering one instead of a 29er but looking for some guidance, can anyone help?

1. I note they are good in most terrains but in mid winter do you need specific mud tyres?
2. Parts are they easyish to come by?
3. To get to the singletrack near my house I have some roads to cover, am I correct in assuming they are ok on the road to get to fun stuff
4. Hard packed summer trails will the pugsley do the business in the woods.

I have watched the bid on this thread and am smiling at the thought of getting one, but would like to hear from personal experience in regards to questions above.

Thanks to all those whom reply

Ps 20inch or 22 for an 18st 6ft 2 bloke. My P7 is 21 and fits like a glove


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 7:39 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Have a look at Coastkids vids, he seems to manage very well on every type of terrain.

Parts seem to be relatively easy to come by as apart from frame and forks (if you go for 135mm) the only differences are wheels/hubs and bottom bracket. Would have thought smaller rather than larger would be the way to go but bars tend to be higher by the look of most set-ups. Depends what you are getting and what the geometry is compared to your P7!


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 9:16 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Had a wee game of email volleyball with Pat CJ at Ison today. Talking numbers of Puglseys we want on a pre-order for March,

sadly no movement on the Mukluk at all.

We will be stocking up on all spares relevant to Pug's also.

Mantastic - you have mail btw if i assume correctly that your initials are C.S.


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 9:18 pm
Posts: 35
Free Member
 

I can vouch, they're great on sand....
[IMG] [/IMG]

still no bl**dy snow.............


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 9:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@thebikechain, indeed that is me. Just checking the geometry on my P7 and F100 before I make my mind up on size. Looks like my F100 is in-between a 20 and 22 but my F100 has the headset extension on and seat post is nearly fully out. Oh decisions decisions.

Will check my emails when back at work in the morrow


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 2449
Full Member
 

Mukluk eta is march
Complete pugsley start arriving in Jan - offering a discount on pre-orders, just email me on Bikemonger at yahoo dot co dot uk
Demo pug should be in the shop in January

The original question... Do they Go beyond snow. The shop demo pug is going straight to the nudist beach sand dunes when it arrives. It should be great on the endless singletrack of sand, swamp and leathery old pervert!


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 8:57 am
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Had an email back from Conrad - probably easier just to copy and paste the update below - hope he doesn't mind but it will answer some questions people might have
[i]In januari production will start on a batch of complete Gobi bikes, available by the end of that month. Those bikes will be spec'ed "high end": Hope, XO, Race Face, Joplin seatpost...
Apart from that we'll offer loose frames in the 4 versions: Gobi (light alu), Atacama (normal alu), Kalahari (Steel) and Outback (alu tandem). You'll be able to tick off a whole list of options: rack bosses, number of bottle cage studs, type of headset, EBB option for single speed, standard colours or special paint, any special wishes...
If you already have an idea what you want and be first in line, we can alreday sort a frame out for you by email. Delivery would be no sooner then mid january, I'm out of some of the raw material (the dropouts), that should arrive within a few weeks.

Price for a Kalahari frame would be around 500 Euro, depending on the options you'd want. Attached a picture of a nice Kalahari one of our test riders just finished.[/i]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good thread chaps, I think a few here are fat-curious!

"Chubby Chasers" - is that the correct expression? 😀


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 8:49 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

I knew some fat curious lads in kid army lol esp after a few jars


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any of you Pug owners running a second set of 29er wheels in addition to the fat wheels?


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 9:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

problem with having regular (that would be 29er) wheels built to a 17mm offset is there strength.
it can be done but its not ideal...
hence the 2nd generation fatbikes with a wider hub (165mm) inline (like normal) build wheels which allow regular inline rear wheels built to the wider 165mm hub allowing swappable wheels... 😮

This is the the thing that sounds complicated about these bikes...
the wheels, but its quite simple,offset or non offset 😮


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 10:10 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

ah now i get it so a normal 135 rear non offset wheel in the front and a 165mm hub on the rear non offset too.

so is it worth going with a 135 fork now or is 100 as good , given that you'd lose the ability to stick it in the rear anyway as it 165 at the back

oh and who does 165 rear hubs ?

btw where do you lot buy rims/wheels/tyre etc

thanks


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We need a new thread just on Fat bike wheels!
Only the pugsley standard frameset uses a 17mm offset front fork and wheel to match the rear wheel (to allow chain clearance along with the 100mmBB whilst using a 135mm rear hub) which also allows swappable wheels front and rear...
this was the first set up available off the shelf...
meanwhile Wildfire, an Alaskan design where aready using a 17mm offset rear wheel build on there frames which is what Surly adopted...
Surly also make a pugsley 100mm hub inline hubbed fork called the Adventure fork which takes a normal inline wheel...though with a wider rim than normal to allow to seat a 4" surly tyre,
general findings is a rim at least 45mm for these tyres...
More lately other companys have made availble a fork which takes a 135mm (rear) hub or now available a 135mm front hub.
So now alot of fatbike companys like Alaskan speedway cycles make 165mm rear inline wheeled framesets and 135 inline forks..
confused? dont worry most folk are!
check out MTBR`s fatbike forum which answers most questions 😮


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 10:54 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

Merci mr 😉


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 1:01 am
Posts: 39747
Free Member
 

mick try getting a 100mm rim into a 100mm fork 😉

im trying to engineer an alfine into the rear of my sandman - it has a nuschool 165mm rear end - i have my methods - it wont be as easy as i thought though - might be easier to put my rohloff in 😉

Im sure ill get through the issues though !


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 7:47 am
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

Fair on I was thinking of something around 50mm for a rim but I guess if your gonna go fat you may as well go real fat


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 9:12 am
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

Doh double post. My baby fat tyres hopefully will arrive today 😉


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 9:13 am
Posts: 39747
Free Member
 

gonna email angus bike chain - see if my sandman + arctic cycles rims arrived 😉

get them to build my wheels for me coming back because i just wanna ride !!


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:08 am
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

I don't really have any decent bike shops round me and They are seem to be too busy to order owt in.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have two SS rear 135mm hubs, do I build two wheels with fat rims or what to use them (at some point in the future) on a fatbike? And what's the cost of F&F set? I don't really care about the logo, ok, On-One would be nice 😉 , steel or alu, whatever. It needs to look sane so no old Sandmen (Sandmans?), please.
Could I get a ti HT frame that will need disc mounts welded on (so it'll be worked on anyway) turned into a fat tyre-accepting jobbie?


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:31 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

You'd need a new rear triangle - cost prohibitive.

I've just ordered up a 48mm rim from tarty bikes to start the expt, to run with a 2.5 Diesel. I'll report back.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 11:08 am
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

Hairychested - Member
..Could I get a ti HT frame that will need disc mounts welded on (so it'll be worked on anyway) turned into a fat tyre-accepting jobbie?

I've been fiddling around with this for the last few months and experimenting with different frames.

If you were doing this then it's better to start with a 29er frame because the fat wheel is about the same diameter. Doing it with a 26" would require more work to achieve a decent geometry.

The other issue is the bottom bracket. Ideally you need a 100mm wide BB shell. There are very wide BBs available that may allow you to get your chainline correct using a narrower shell, but you would need to be sure that you can get the chainline before starting to cut up a frame.

Unless you're doing the welding yourself it's cheaper to buy a Pugsley frame and then everything works out of the box 🙂


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 11:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If I went for a Pug are there any UK available offset drilled rims other than the LMs. Just wondering whether its possible to go upto say 50mm wide, which should run Surly endos etc but obviously with less float. Kris Holm do them wide enough but I dont think they have the offset required for the pug. Maybe A Mukluk frameset would be a better idea?


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 11:54 am
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

[u][b][url= http://classic-cycle.de/index.php?force_sid=95e625814951dff647affc4390dd2b08&cl=search&searchparam=dhl+26&searchcnid=57d41ac52198ad096.80471172 ]Fatbike rims - fill your boots[/url][/b][/u] 🙂


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 6:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice prices too, cheers 🙂


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicyclo, where do you buy spokes for the fat wheels?
Also, what's the cost of the frame, fork and BB? Wheels can be costly but I can sort of buy the rims now, build them later, buy tyres at some point next year. The other bits are not a problem but I won't buy on credit so need to save up (I can buy on the continent if it's cheaper).
Out of curiosity, would a fat rimmed wheel fit a 456SS?


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:04 pm
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

Just ordinary spokes. I use DTSwiss Comps.

I have not measured a 456, but I think it's unlikely that the wheel would fit. Its overall diameter is more or less the same as a 29er wheel, and if you are using a wide rim the tyre width is about 98mm. You could use a narrower rim, about 40mm gives you a tyre width of 88mm.

Some people are simply using the fattest ordinary rear tyre that they can get on the rear (eg [url= http://www.unicycle.uk.com/duro-wildlife-leopard-26-x-3-tyre-2.html/ ]Duro 3" tyre[/url]) and having a fat wheel and fork on the front. That way you get almost all the benefits, except that a proper fat tyre may roll better than the 3" DH oriented one.

You can save money on the fork by making your own out of a worn out suspension fork. [u][b][url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/fatbike-forks-diy-no-welding-from-junk ]Look here for how I did it[/url][/b][/u]


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 1:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've just told my wife I understand next year Xmas pressie will be a Pug f+f set. Should be enough time for her to get organised.
Am I correct thinking a Pugsley will allow me to run two rear wheels 135mm?
What's better, those 80mm rims from Germany or narrower trials ones?


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 11:11 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Having read into it a bit on mtbr and here, wider rims work better for the soft stuff but less well on normal trails.

Like I said I'm trying it step by step as it's pricy go all the way in one go.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 11:17 am
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

Hairychested - Member
...Am I correct thinking a Pugsley will allow me to run two rear wheels 135mm?
What's better, those 80mm rims from Germany or narrower trials ones?

Are you thinking of something like a set of 29er wheels for summer and fatwheels for winter?

If so, my opinion is that the amount of offset required for the Pug frame would mean you would have a very flimsy 29er wheel - one flange would be almost directly under the spoke holes and the other at a fair angle. Tension on one set of spokes would be extremely high and the others quite slack. I have built up a wheel like this with a 40mm rim, but I decided I'd rather not ride on it 🙂 If you can get a rim that is wide enough to drill offset spoke holes, that would be much better.

Velocity make an [u][b][url= http://www.velocitywheels.com/store/product.asp?pID=32&cID=18 ]offset rim[/url][/b][/u] but a bit narrow for a 29er tyre. I'd go for something like the [u][b][url= http://www.velocitywheels.com/store/product.asp?pID=248&cID=18 ]Psycho[/url][/b][/u] and drill my own offset holes* - which would also allow you to do a crossover lace up for even more strength.

As far as rim width is concerned between 40mm and 80mm rims you gain an extra 10mm of tyre width. The trials rims are lighter, but let's take stock, this is a Landrover you're building not a Lamborghini 🙂 I'd go for the flotation - you can always drill out the rims anyway and lose quite a few pounds, as does going tubeless although that appears to have a spotted history on low pressure tyres (I have no personal experience).

*I drilled my fat rims offset to get a crossover (left flange to right hand hole on rim etc) to get a really strong wheel (also redrilled from 36 to 32 holes). You can see it here

[url= http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1369/5178780700_49bd728379_o.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1369/5178780700_49bd728379_o.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

Sorry about the big pic, but it shows it clearly.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 11:48 am
Posts: 2940
Free Member
 

Personally - I'd go for versatility and lighter weight with 50mm rims. It gives you plenty of float combined with better trail handling on normal trails. The Larry on a 50mm rim is great, it has a nice round profile and corners really well, compared to the Endo which was much flatter on the same rim. For sure- 100mm look more rad and all but I'm not convinced all that added weight is worth it.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have several bikes to ride when I want narrower wheels, so interested in floaty, beach and snow perfect setup. I'd love to have a set of wiiiide wheels and swap-ability with a 29er set is of no interest to me.
The important thing for me is to spread it in time, I'm jobless at the mo, income is very limited but we should be fine next year. That's why I'm considering building the wheels now, maybe even 1 at the time. I just want to have decent wheels without too many problems. Without drilling. BTW How did you know where to drill?
Those classic bikes rims, when building SS wheels, would it be just like any other rim?


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

Just my thoughts on the wider v narrower rim thing.

I started off with a 65mm rim and found the tyre to be a bit "wandery" at low psi in corners on hard surfaces.

Switched to an 80mm rim and it feels a lot better at the same pressure.

The Larry still has a round prolife on the tread surface with an 80mm rim too. I can't comment what the Endo's like though as i only ever tried them once and that was quite a while back.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 3:50 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Aye that's what I meant above - reports seem to be that a wider rim is needed for lower pressures.

See:

http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=668652


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 3:53 pm
Posts: 2940
Free Member
 

That thread is about sub 50mm rims - more like 30mm is what they're on about. I'm not convinced that the extra 3lb or so, more weight is justified by the extra float.... JMHO 🙂

Hairy - It took me 2.5 years to put my bike together! Saving the pennies and accumulating parts at the same time.... worth the wait though 😀 Now I just with this flu would clear up and I could ride it!!
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

frc.

3Lb difference?

I'd check your scales. 😉

Seriously try a wider rim for yourself.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 5:16 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

What width rim is that on the front futon


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

Hairychested - Member
...BTW How did you know where to drill?

Ran a dressmakers cloth tape around the rim, took the measurement and divided by 32.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So are these fat bikes good all year round? A few have commented but lots of posts about the spec etc rather than how they ride.

Not moaning about the spec type chat as all information is useful but just looking for opinion about the ride all year round rather than when just snowy or sandy


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 5:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mantastic - Member
So are these fat bikes good all year round? A few have commented but lots of posts about the spec etc rather than how they ride.

Not moaning about the spec type chat as all information is useful but just looking for opinion about the ride all year round rather than when just snowy or sandy

Have a look at coastkids video


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 2940
Free Member
 

Firestarter - the rim is a 50mm Uma by Speedway.

I was thinking that the 100mm rims weighed 1560g? As in this thread: http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=586418
The 50mm Uma weighs 750g IIRC so a pair would be 1500g as compared to 3120g - the difference is 3.5lb - there may be lighter 100mm out there!

Stu - funds are a little hard to come by at the moment - but if any rim is going to get fatter, it will be the rear wheel that gets fatterer. I'm very happy with the way the 50mm front rim performs. What advantages can I expect from a 100mm front rim, bearing in mind sand does not feature in my rides at all.

Mantastic - I ride mine all year round, no reason not too 😀


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 6:07 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

I think 100mm for a front rim on a fatfront bike is going a bit too far but the 80 does make the tyre a lot more stable than a 65 at lower psi.

I'll be going fatter on the back too when my fullfat bike arrives. 😆


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 214
Free Member
 

when are the two salsa fat bike owners having their group ride then ? 8)


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 6:18 pm
Page 2 / 6