Forum search & shortcuts

Stooge Cycles - who...
 

[Closed] Stooge Cycles - who's interested? (slack 29er content)

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OK, so i REALLY need to put the seatclamp size on the website, and it is.... 31.8. The seatmast has a brazed shim inside to provide all important strength at the top tube junction. The actual tube is a lit thinner once you head down to the BB.

Monkeyrider, your build sounds sweet, can't wait to see some pics of that one.

BB7's will fit on the back with a 180 rotor. I've not tried a 203, i imagine it might be okay, though a definite case of overkill 🙂


 
Posted : 24/07/2014 11:56 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

The BB shell is 68mm I think. Listed as 73mm.


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 7:47 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Lovely looking/sounding bikes here. Why the love of mechanical brakes by the way, simplicity?


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 8:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nearly all parts have been ordered.
I'll start the build tomorrow. Can't wait!

Spec for me:
SS 32x18
XT cranks
740mm low rise devinci bars
50mm Kona stem
Charge Spoon
SS seatpost
Deore brakes & 160mm rotors
Cane Creek headset
Flows on ProII- not sure on tyres yet.
KMC chain
Then just pedals and done!

Total cost around £800 and should weigh about 25 lbs.
This build will be my winter hack bike/no maintenance option.


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 9:30 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

lol ^^, back to a 29er trail bike then?

how's that student loan coming on 😉


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 9:32 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Tis 68


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm off up to Sideways tomorrow to collect my bits. A collection of purple Hope (hubs, headset) Thomson (post, stem) and XT (brakes, mech, cranks) with Dually rims and a Knard up front. My frame, which has been mantelpiece art for the last six weeks will finally get built.

Expect this thread and [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/placid_casual/sets/72157644970654521/ ]my Flickr album[/url] to be inundated with photos...
[url= https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5585/14141182589_e032c4b5e0_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5585/14141182589_e032c4b5e0_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/nxBfUV ]Mantelpiece art. #newframe #stoogecycles[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/people// ]placid casual[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, you know I've got a problem Matt 😆
If you're nice I'll let you have a go at Swinley sometime.

Payrise and overtime means the MSc loan should be gone by the end of the year 😀


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 10:04 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

good job. swap you for a go on my nice new chrome Nimble 9. Stooge looks good to me too, one of my riding buddies has just received a purple one.

@placid that looks lovely on the mantelpiece, best buy another for riding!


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 10:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BB 68mm and not 73 as listed on website???
Shure?!

Unpleasant surprize:
Means I need to order another square bb .........


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 2:21 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

deffo 68

C'mon Andy, website detail needs sorting 😉


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Confusing....just got a message from CTBM to confirm its 73 😕

Andy........HELP !


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 4:36 pm
Posts: 943
Free Member
 

Just put a BB in one today 68 it be .


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 5:20 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Aye 68 here too.
Finally got all the bits to build the Stooge up. Apologies to Andy for any compromises valve/logo misalignment 🙂
Rabbit hole rims, Knard front and Ardent 2.4 back (comes up nice and wide on these rims). Set up tubeless with sht load of Stans and Gorrilla tape.
1 x 10 thick/thin chainring / clutch mech. So we'll see how that handles steps...

Will probably go for layback seat post, depending on how the cockpit fettling goes. Keeping the front high on Andy's recommendation. Opposite to what I'm used to, but felt right on the demo bike, so I'm going to try it for a bit.
Generally built burly. Lovely frame.
SLX front brake on a Surly hub was tight with IS to post adaptor. May need some tinkering later.

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]

Right lets get the thing... dusty 🙂


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 5:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

firstly, massive apologies re the website misinformation, the bb is 68mm, used to be 73 when i specced a threaded BB, update on the way. Especially sorry to Monkeyrider for buying the wrong size, what size T shirt do you wear, i'll send you one gratis to make up for the bother (when they arrive).

M(alec) - your build looks very very nice, can't wait to hear what you think of it on the trails. Keep me posted.


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 6:46 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hey Mal - nice build

Could you post a closer up of the front chainring assy (it's a fettish thing)

Cheere


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 7:15 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Was dark by the time I got back 🙂 Will try + get some tomorrow.

Holy ****g moley. What an ace bike.

I know I know its proper bone dry trails out there + new bike love rose tints it all.
But that was some of the funnest riding I can remember. High front end, combined with low centre of gravity + tight back end feels very precise, balanced, encouraging lots of weight shifting and general hoonery. Fun as.

Feels like a newly strung Fender Precision through a cranked up Trace Elliot.

Big fast rolling tyres on wide rims feel bang on. Will want something grippier up front when it gets wet.

Reminds me of the best aspects of the original Trek 69er single speed (benchmark singletrack bike, mad capable).

This is a proper rider's bike. [/gush]


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 10:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hi Mal-Ec

Nice ! Tires look massive on those rims. Would be nice to see this Stooge against a Krampus on trail?!

@jonestown
XL would do 🙂


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 10:42 pm
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

My build's been delayed by all sorts of frustrating stuff. Hoping to build and ride it this weekend, although a wide front rim and Knard will have to wait a bit longer.


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 11:08 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

If anyones going to be using Rabbit Holes on a Surly hub they may need a couple of these to get the rotor position right so the brake calliper doesn't foul the spokes [url= http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/hope-rotor-spacer/rp-prod3288?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Shopping&utm_name=UnitedKingdom&gs=1&gclid=CJ7q6IbO4b8CFbPJtAodV1kAXg&gclsrc=aw.ds ]Rotor spacer things[/url]


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 12:32 am
Posts: 2940
Free Member
 

Really needs a fat fork, for more fun 😉


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 9:25 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I disagree. 29+ keeps allot of the advantages of full fat, but rolls and response way better. Sticking a heavy slow turning front wheel on there would lose some of the sharpness and manoeuvrability that makes this bike so much fun.


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mal-ec - Member

If anyones going to be using Rabbit Holes on a Surly hub they may need a couple of these to get the rotor position right so the brake calliper doesn't foul the spokes - Hope Rotor spacers.

This worked for me with SLX brakes on my front Rabbit Hole wheel, the spacer stopped the calliper lightly rubbing on the spokes.

That's a stunning looking bike by the way Mal-ec. Your ride report sounds very similar to my thoughts after my first ride on my Surly Krampus.


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Newly finished ... or at least it would be if the 30t On-One TT ring wasn't inducing combined chainsuck and chain drop 😐

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 6:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I just put a 34t onone narrowwide on a used 9sp chain/system and that works well.


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mai-ec, re fat front, unless of course the front is slightly steeper to compensate....houses for courses. Also depends what you want to ride, if it is rock gardens etc, fat is a touch more comfortable.

Interesting thread to read , especially since my Jones will be returning to me and I sometimes ride with Placid-casual.

I never found the Jones cockpit too short, but then I used a 90mm stem. Which will be interesting to return to since my current full suss has a 7mm stem! The slightly shorter cockpit was deliberate on Jeff's part to make getting the weight off your wrists and letting the front float easy on very steep and rough tracks. I can vouch for that working as I raced mine on some proper evil rock gardens. Could have done with a bit more HSC and HSR on the front tyre though"

This looks like a really nice bike at a great price.


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 11:10 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Paceman. Ta. Did you have to file a smidge off the brake adaptor as well?
Another nice build.
Rode until sunset, again.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mal-ec, the spacer between the hub and rotor sorted the spoke-rubbing issue for me, I didn't need any other modifications. That was with SLX brakes, it may need more with some other calliper shapes.


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 8:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Built.
[url= https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2938/14568900188_2b90a82ea4_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2938/14568900188_2b90a82ea4_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/ocpqsh ]Stooge build day (5)[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/people// ]placid casual[/url], on Flickr

Purple Hope, XT/Zee and Thomson bits (the stem hasn't arrived yet so has a Crank Bros temporarily fitted) with Velocity Dually rims. I still need to shorten hoses, but maybe not if I fit the Jones bars.

Plenty more pictures here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/placid_casual/sets/72157644970654521


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 10:12 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Nice.


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 10:48 am
Posts: 2940
Free Member
 

Mal-ec - I have a 29er+ 50mm wheel with a 3" tyre, 65mm rim carbon fat wheel currently with a Husker Du, and a 72mm rim with 4.8" bud. All have their place, a fat fork will simply add more options and fun and be versatile !! My new carbon rim/HD UL combo weighs about the same as the 29+ setup - it is neither slow nor unresponsive, with the added benefit of being proper fat ;), unlike the 29+ . With a fat setup you have options for different rubber, BFL, Larry, HUDU, Knard, various Vee rubber, floater, for 29+ you have only the Knard, which is sub-par in my opinion.

The Stooges are looking really nice though! 🙂


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 10:36 pm
Posts: 3453
Full Member
 

what are the build weights?


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 9:39 pm
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

Here's mine at last...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 9:52 pm
Posts: 8064
Full Member
 

There's a little green eyed monster trying to tap CTBM's url into my phone. 😆


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 10:44 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Let it loose. No idea on weight. Strong with more twang than Duane Eddy. Did a big 4 hr hilly ride yesterday without feeling I was hauling anything unnecessary around.

Another really nice build.

FRC, I get what you're saying, but having to by one of the multiple fat front hub "standard" might put people off? I toyed with putting my fat forks and wheel on the front. After riding it I wouldn't, all about personal choice + options eh? Looking forward to more 29+ rubber coming out.


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 10:58 pm
Posts: 2940
Free Member
 

No need to - if you have another bike with a fat front- my jones is my only bike, so it's nice to have multiple options available 😉

Really like the purple!


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 11:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Vondally, my bike weighs 26lbs, there's nothing partucularly lightweight about the components, so i imagine it'd be fairly easy to hit 24lbs if that's what you wanted.

Re the fat front - one of the important factors to me when designing the bike was that people could take their present 29er, rip it to bits and put it all back together on a Stooge frame, give or take a few little bits.

A couple of years ago i toyed with buying a Jones, it was the front hub that put me off. The Stooge is at its prime with a Knard up front, i think a fat front would lower the front end and steepen the HA a little, so in theory the fork would need to be longer to preserve the geometry. These are just my thoughts on it. I know Martin has built one up with that setup, no feedback yet on what it rides like, but i'd be interested to know.

On the same note, there will be a few pairs of fat forks coming through as an option in the future, just need to work out the figures.


 
Posted : 30/07/2014 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just to be shure;
It appears that the Stooge has a "build-in" frame saver to protect against internal rust (?)
Does it make sense to ad Tectyl ML or similar for extra protection?


 
Posted : 30/07/2014 8:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Regarding fat front; I do have a Karate Monkey with Enabler fork and 26x3.8 Knard full fat tire.....Great bike!
The steeper headangle of the KM makes is very manouvrable at lower and medium speed......much nicer steering as f.e Onone Fatty I had before. Goes steady through all sorts of terrain, very close to wat a full fatbike does....except deep snow and dry beach. But....downhill the steeper headangle and "bouncing" caracter prevents very high speeds.

A 29+ 29x3 Knard up front gives much less "float" and comfort on rough or soft terrain...but feels much lighter and faster on hard terrain on a KM. I think that's a better match with the slacker headangle and fast&playfull caracter of a Stooge.

This is exactly the reason I ordered a Stooge next to my KM........KM-fatfront for "slower" rough/soft/muddy fatbike-like terrain and Stooge with 29+ front for fast riding.


 
Posted : 30/07/2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My thoughts exactly, Monkeyrider.

re protecting a steel frame in horrendous British or Dutch weather, a can of framesaver will never be unwelcome. You can also spray waxoyl through the various holes inside the headtube and bb.


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 12:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Andy,

do you have a paint code for the aqua blue?

I showed my wife still s8tannorm's photo and that's pretty much the colour she wants her bike resprayed.

Cheers


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 7:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yes i do, i'll check it out and post it later. In the meantime check out YS paint's website, it's on there amongst loads of other fine colours.


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 7:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Will do, thanks 🙂


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 7:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2935/14605607998_86a6e0431f_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2935/14605607998_86a6e0431f_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/ofDypy ]More Stooge[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/people// ]placid casual[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 8:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This morning my frameset arrived from CTBM ............some quick building...........first ride on my local trail............and the first pictures of a (somewhat dusty) Dutch Stooge.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Few things are temporary; I am waiting for a polished set-back setpost......the DIY chainguide (made from an old derraileur) will be replaced by a N-gear jumpstop........the 8sp Sachs gripshifter and STX-RC rear derraileur will probable be upgraded to 9sp ......and I need to swap my Mach1 rearwheel to a Blunt35...............but the first ride was FUN.

First impressions: indeed very comfortable for a rigid 29er, feels pretty fast and manouvrable but also steady at higher speeds. I have to get used to the fact you need more body-movement for fast tight curves (slack angle?) ......but it runs as if on rails!


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 9:25 pm
Page 6 / 33