Forum menu
Specialized Tricros...
 

[Closed] Specialized Tricross

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2559920]

I've just had a potter about Edinburgh cyles car park in Byker on a Specialized Tricross and felt that it met my needs for a road bike/commute bike.

HOever I am a numpty when it comes to this.

It felt light, handled well going up and down the street and felt comfortable.

So is it a good buy for a commuter or not?

It's within price range as well.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 2:14 pm
Posts: 3573
Free Member
 

18 months or so on mine - it's brilliant.

comfy [i got the comp] with carbon + zertz and rack / guard mounts. what's not to like ?

go for it ¬!


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 2:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I love mine and it is the singlespeed version.

Full mudguards fitted straight on and so did the schwalbe marathon 700 x 35 tyres for commuting. I went with them for more comfort as I have a road bike already but if I did not then I would probably have fitted a narrower pair.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So is it a good buy for a commuter or not?

Yes

But if you aren't going to ride it off road, get a road bike.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

^ Not 100% sure if it will be 100% road to work.

The option of going off road is tempting, but might be defeating the purpose of a commuter.

Will I notice a massive difference between a road bike and the tricross?

Are we talking 20 minutes different in ride time or just minutes if I was to go on the tricross to work?


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 6:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Quirel

Ive been looking at getting something for road only. 500 quid seems to get you a road bike weighing about 10kg. Not bad at all. Some of which are ready for guards to be fitted. Others appear painful to fit guards.

I will not be using be using it off road. The only advantage (of a CX) for my usage is that the CX bikes have disc brakes and give you the option of going off-road - but I'm fairly sure I wont use that option.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 7:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

^ That is what I'm stuck on.

If I pop over to my folks flat I would be taking on and off road for the more direct route.

TO work I'm pretty sure it's all road and cycleways.

The bike would be mainly for commuting, but I like the idea of being able to use for other uses.

THen I have my HT for general duties and my FS for fun on the hills.

I could quite easily buy a CX and put smooth tyres on it for road duties, knowing that they can be changed. Whereas the other way around probably isn't so doable with the thinner wheels.

Maybe I should just ride my 1x8 Wanga to work instead and man up.......but then again possibly not.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 7:27 pm
Posts: 6131
Full Member
 

I had that thought recently as well. With the recent winter wrecking roads and trails I thought about a CX bike for riding forest roads around here and commuting the short ride to work.
Having had a go on a Tricross I have since changed my mind and will be keeping my Raleigh Ti road bike and using mtb.
The Tricross just felt dull compared to my road bike, not surprising really. They are probably quicker offroad on forest/rough roads thatn an mtb but not convinced I could justify it. Would also mean going back to cantis or V brakes and the constant rim changing of old 🙄


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 7:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"constant" rim changing. Really ? A tad dramatic 🙂


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 7:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What is the difference between an audax and the tricross?


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 8:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not a Tricross, but I brought a CX last week for my road/canal path commute (14 miles). I Decided to take the slightly longer way home on Friday, the CX was not as quick as a HT on the tech stuff (well for me anyway) but quick on the fire tracks.

So far I found it to be quicker than a HT on the road but also nice to have the option over a pure road bike on taking a scenic route.

Anyway this gives me a reason to post up my pics from Friday's commute home;
[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

14 miles one way or both ways?


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 8:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

each way, do it twice a week at the moment, part drive/ride the other days and just ride the last 2-3 miles. Plan to slowly build it up to 3-4 times a week for the summer.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 8:42 pm
Posts: 2728
Free Member
 

The Tricross just felt dull compared to my road bike

try an 's-works' tricross. very definitely not dull. compared to my road bike (scott cr1 sl).


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 8:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They are good bikes, it will be slightly slower than a road bike over distance but given the state of the roads then with slightly more volume in the tyres and more robust wheels it's a much better bet. I've a Tricross Comp and a Roubaix expert and the Tricross gets ridden a lot more, on and off road. Over a 30 mile hilly Dartmoor ride the Roubaix is a few minutes faster.

Only drawback, the 2x10 gearing on the comp is a little high for me off road, a mate with the next model down has a triple and 9 speed which gives him a more usable range.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 9:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What are the other brands cyclocross's at the 750 price range like? Much in the muchness or does the tricross really stand out?


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 9:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't really look at any others as was offered a really good deal on mine, there was a Ridley Crossbow (?) in the shop but luckily too small for me. If looking now I'd be sorely tempted to get one with disks just for the benefits when it's really muddy, but someone will be along in a minute to say that's part of the fun on a CX in the mud. And they do have a point. 😉 I think that the Tricross is more a utility / CX bike as they do the Crux as a full on crosser, no rack mounts etc. on that one.

If you've not had a road / CX before then fit is more important than on an MTB, you'll be sat down a lot more on the road so if you've a good LBS I'd see what they can do for you.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The XL I tried today was fine, but I'm 193cm so really should have an xxl, but I guess I'm not going to know until I'm on the road properly if it is too big or small.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 9:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

6'4" and an XXL here if that helps.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Same as me.

I've spotted a 2010 model for 599 on sale. I think it has cantilever brakes though


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 9:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Focus Mares has Canti's but I've not found them a problem, powerful enough to endo, fine on the road etc... and were just about ok on some steep singletrack. But obviously disc's are much better offroad.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think the canti's are standard. I was confusing them with v-brakes.

594 quid is a decent saving on the 749 retail.


 
Posted : 13/03/2011 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nothing wrong with cantis. Mine came with Mini-Vs and when paired with road levers that was a truly terrifying braking experience in the wet!


 
Posted : 14/03/2011 10:33 pm