show me your 1x8/9/...
 

[Closed] show me your 1x8/9/10 speeds...

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I want an idea of what mine will look like.Im hopefully getting a e 13 xcx guide.
thanks
Bruce


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:08 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

I used a clear FSA bashguard and an old MRP thing and got my local machine shop to lengthen the slots to adjust the rollers so it would be OK for a 32 tooth ring. I'd like one of those new Straitline ones just cos it'll match the frame better! But at £100 or more it'll have to do for now.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How does the old chainline get affected using 1 ring? Does it wear a bit quicker going up/down the whole block all the time?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:21 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

*shrugs* Dunno really. I've got 3 bikes that get used fairly evenly, so I don't notice when stuff wears out so much.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We definitely should have a sticky on this subject!

[img] [/img]

I think it's popular because it's so simple. The guys I ride with run 22/36 and end up starting a climb in the big ring only to have to shift down to the granny ring part way through. Running 1x9 allows me to keep a higher but more regular cadence. It works for me but then I don't have to climb Munros every time I ride.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dark Cycles bash and n-gear jumpstop:

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:17 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

E13 SLS:

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

Hi guys

What size front rings are you using?

Thanks

Ruddy


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:50 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

I'm on a 32 front and 11:32 rear. I'd like a 34 front and 11:34 rear, but that will have to wait till the current stuff is worn out in which case I'll prolly go 10 speed to get an even bigger range.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

32t front 11-34 rear. 11-36 would be even better.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 7:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1x9 using an LG1+ running 32 and 11-34. I will consider 10 speed when my drivetrain dies if I can get a larger range cassette to help a bit on the really steep stuff or when Im feeling lazy.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 8:09 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Im hopefully getting a e 13 xcx guide.

[img] [/img]

Sorry only photo I have of it as 1x9 shall get some nicer ones up once I give it a good clean! (36 front ring)


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

Not great photo but you get the idea


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 8:53 am
Posts: 4293
Free Member
 

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?id=59306812&noresize=1 [/img]

E13 LG1+taco, 36 ring, 11-32 casette.

I do have slight problems with chainline at the botom end of the cassette - the chain comes onto the bottom jockey wheel at a bit of an angle (the mech cage is tight forward at that point) and tends to jump on the teeth a bit. Easily solved by putting a very slight twist in the cage.

Works for me. Surrey Hills and trail centres are no problem. Peaks, a lot of stuff can be got up with a bit of grunting, the tech stuff is obviously more of a push. The bike is a size too small for me and haqs a really wee stem, neither of which help uphill, but does make it very fun down. The single ring setup is far quieter over rough ground than the doubles or triples I also use.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 9:09 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I must admit, I don't really get the single ring thing. Double I can really see the advantage, but not single ring, there negligible weight saving, and it just seems like a compromise, is it singlespeeding for those who don't want to singlespeed?!


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Jey 1x9.

32 front, 11-32 rear.

I have a fairly fast cadence, and I find the ratio fine for fast-paced XC rides. I start to spin out on roads, but then I tend not to bother pushing myself on the roads when riding MTB (I have a road bike for that). It is possible to spin out on downhill sections too, but in those situations I tend to be concentrating on bike-handling.

I ride with a bunch of fast people who have triples, and I don't find having a single ring an obstacle to keeping up with them.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 9:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I must admit, I don't really get the single ring thing. Double I can really see the advantage, but not single ring, there negligible weight saving, and it just seems like a compromise, is it singlespeeding for those who don't want to singlespeed?!

Ya see, I don't really get the double ring thing: limit your functionality but no real weight saving!

If you go 1x9 you can get rid of 1xshifter 1xcable 1xmech 2xrings (and bolts) and only have to add a chainguide (~60g), this means you get a significant weight saving over a triple or double, if that's your bag. If you have a double you still need the shifter, cable and mech.

I got rid of my big and small rings because I spent what seemed like 99% of my time in the middle ring - and this was on fast XC rides. The main reason I went 1x9 was because I got annoyed with having all this stuff on my bike I hardly ever used.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 9:26 am
 Keva
Posts: 3275
Free Member
 

1x9 simplifies the bike and still gives a good range of gears.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 9:32 am
Posts: 440
Free Member
 

My short blast. trail centre, 4X bike...
[img] [/img]

And my XC bike...
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]

Both have 34t chainrings and i think 34t cassettes (maybe 32).
I have been riding with a single ring on all of my bikes for nearly 4 years now and really i've never found it as a compromise. I can get up all the climbs i ride locally and only find it a problem in the lakes. But the majority of the folk i ride with are also pushing at the same time.
Like someone else mentioned, i changed to a single chainring as i had a 22/32/bash on an old bike and hardly used the granny ring, tried it without the granny as an experiment and never went back.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 10:10 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

What's the cheapest chainguide that works?

I'm not convinced an N-gage bumpstop is good enough, DMR apparently not that great and a front mech looks poo.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

front mech is cheapest!

[img] [/img]

hmmmm. cheapo.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 10:32 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Ya see, I don't really get the double ring thing: limit your functionality but no real weight saving!

Fair enough, guess it's a horses for courses thing, I don't see a double as limiting your functionality, it gives you all the usable gears of a triple but with better chainlines and a very slight weight benefit.

I just think I'd struggle to choose a gear that would work for me on a single ring, I'd spin out a 32, but using a 36 would inevitably end up with grunting up some of the hills, some days being able to spin, or ride with slower people is nice!


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 10:43 am
Posts: 0
 

using a n-gear jumpstop
[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 10:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@njee20

Sounds like you need to wait for 1x10 😉


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 11:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@tracknicko

you've dropped your keys!


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dude, i took that photo to show folks, after i 'lost' my keys for a whole day. they were sat on the floor for 7hrs in central sheffield yesterday, right next to my bike.

who says crime is on the up???


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Ultegra RM, 11-32 and 32t, e13 LG1 holding it all in place.


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 12:56 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3275
Free Member
 

[i]i 'lost' my keys for a whole day. they were sat on the floor for 7hrs in central sheffield yesterday, right next to my bike.

who says crime is on the up???
[/i]

The security is in the paint work. No one in their right mind would want to be seen dead on that ghastly thing !


 
Posted : 21/04/2010 1:05 pm