Short stems
 

[Closed] Short stems

13 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
68 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think I understand the philosophy behind them, sharper handling, better body position on the bike(?) etc. but has anyone actually gone from a 70mm to a 50mm or even 65mm and thought Wow! that's loads better or did you feel more cramped and ditch the idea?

Real experiences and advice please?

Cheers,

Dan


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 5:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I went from 90mm down to 70mm and felt a noticeable difference.


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I went from a 90mm to a 50mm and it made a massive difference in the handling for me. I also added some highrisers too though. my bike didn't like climbing anyway so the shorter stem hasn't affected me in that way


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 5:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Went from a 90mm to a 50mm on my Heckler, and yes, first ride I loved it. Better steering, easier to lift the wheel and I haven't had any problems climbing that a bit of effort or leaning couldn't overcome.

Having said that, I am doing more AM/DH than XC and spin my way slowly up most climbs.


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 6:03 pm
Posts: 2880
Free Member
 

I've just got my 70mm stem in the post today - I'll let you know!


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 6:06 pm
Posts: 2880
Free Member
 

Ok -a quick spin round the block later - yup - a big difference 🙂


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 10487
Free Member
 

I went the other way 65mm to 90mm and my bike handles way better 8)


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 7:05 pm
Posts: 66012
Full Member
 

I've been going both ways with mine, Hemlock kept getting shorter and is now nice and sorted at 50mm, and it does make a difference... Soul went 80-70-60 but just went back up to 70mm, 60 was nice on the descents but it took a wee bit more effort to keep the nose planted and I just got tired of it.


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 7:18 pm
Posts: 1231
Free Member
 

I went from 100mm to 80mm and noticed a difference. Soon I'll be going down to about 50mm. It depends what kind of riding you do really. I like my bike to perform better going downhill so I'm setting it up that way.


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 320
Free Member
 

started with a 90mm and gradually went smaller, right down to a 35mm which was great on the descents but not so great all round, now running 50mm on both bikes with very low rise very wide bars.


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My bike has to do everything up (not so keen on them) , down, jumps, trails the lot. Currently ay 70mm. I'll check the classifieds.


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 11:16 pm
Posts: 9228
Free Member
 

I've been trying a 90mm stem for the last few days. It was ok but I found it too sluggish and forwards for descending with - not comfortable imo. I put the 50mm back on and everything feels right again 🙂 Not quite as good for climbing with but I'd rather have more fun on the downs and jumps. My bike is a "do it all" - DMR Trailstar.

Its made me think about getting a frame with a slightly longer TT though as it should be the best of both worlds - better climbing position but still lets you have a responsive front end?


 
Posted : 09/07/2010 11:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a 60mm, went down from a 70mm. If I'm honest I can't feel a difference in handling, but my bike almost fits me now!


 
Posted : 10/07/2010 6:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ive been slowly shortening and heightening my cockpit for months now. The front end of my inbred is 445 a-c rigid forks, about 190mm steerer, hope 35 degree 70mm stem on top of that with easton mid rise EA50s.

The lack of shoulder/neck pain makes its worth it. Not noticed problems climbing yet but ultra steep is a bit hard on SS.


 
Posted : 10/07/2010 7:22 am