Shimano braking per...
 

Shimano braking performance on 29" with 160mm rotors and a stuck lockring

16 Posts
10 Users
5 Reactions
563 Views
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Hello all

I bought a "new" bike for my daughter on ebay, Specialized Hardrock, small frame with 29" wheels. All my previous bikes, spares, kit, tools are from the 26" MTB realm. The frame is in great condition but I wanted to freshen up the chainset from the mixture of Shimano/OEM parts to just basic Deore M5100 1x11 that I had lying about. All good.

Next it was the brakes. The stock hydraulic brakes (Shimano but some generic-sub-Deore level) felt super-weak, not at the lever, the grab seemed solid enough and not squishy which would indicate bleeding required. Just in terms of basic stopping distance. I couldn't lock the rear enough to even do a skid on the road without the thing slowly squeaking to a halt.

So I picked up a pair of Deore M-6100s from ebay, new resin pads, a full bleed, no real improvement. Nothing like as powerful as I was expecting, having used Shimano M8000 brakes on my 26" for a few years now, albeit with ice-tech rotors.

Cleaned the rotors with some Peaty's brake cleaner, no improvement. Next logical step was to replace the rotors with brand new like-for-like (SM-RT54-S 160mm front and rear) as it looks like the old ones had seen quite heavy use. I managed to get the rear rotor changed and there is a slight improvement, still not amazing performance... no skids!

1)  Is this unsatisfactory braking performance typical of Deore M-6x00 brakes and non-ice-tech rotors?
I have been running XT M-8000 brakes with ice-tech 160mm rotor at the rear on my 26" machine and they are fantastic.
I appreciate that 29" wheels will represent a larger rotational force requirement for braking so 180mm would become preferable at the front for most MTBers. But 160mm rotor at the rear should surely be adequate even with 29" wheels.
Do I really need to focus on bedding in new pads/rotors? I have never done so before, my XT brakes were great straight out of the box.

2) Now I'm stuck trying to replace the front rotor.
The centrelock tool I have had for years, the type used on cassette lockrings, doesn't fit over the nut of the axle. It's a QR spindle type axle. It worked fine on the rear which had a sort of hex bolt axle nut, but the front is circular of a dimension that's probably 0.5-1mm larger than the inner dimension of my lockring adapter tool.
I guess the original installation of the stock Specialized hub and brakes required the rotor being installed with the axle bolt removed. I would have expected them to use the externally-splined lockring type for this.
I don't have permission to attach pictures so here's some external links... removed link
removed link
removed link
Any suggestions on how to remove the front centrelock lockring here (alternate tool)? I'm basically looking at whacking the tool with a rubber mallet to get it to fit, or burr out some of the inside dimension of the tool, before I start taking the hub apart.

As it goes I'm probably going to sell this 29" bike on anyway. Probably overkill for general scooting around town and light bridleway/forest usage. Even with a small frame this thing weighs probably 30% more than my 20 year-old On-One inbred steel burner bike. There's just more mass/material at every point, forks/steerer, headtube, stem, tubing. Even with the seatpost right down into the frame it's not a comfortable fit for my daughter (160cm)... or our bike shed. And in general it's just a gigantic/massive chunky machine for her to move around.

Thanks all!
Cheers, B

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 2:20 pm
Free Member
 

as a full grown 80kg adult, i only run 160mm rears on my bikes, 29er, 27.5, might be 140 on the road/gravel bike.. more than enough braking performance for me with a 4 pot shimano.

Something isn't right

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 3:09 pm
Free Member
 

Is this unsatisfactory braking performance typical of Deore M-6x00 brakes and non-ice-tech rotors?

Nope, functionally all Shimano 2 pots are the same and should have the same amount of power, and nothing its noticeably different between 29er and 26er wheels. 

Given in your initial description of the issue I would hazard a guess that the rotors were contaminated, to which you appear to have used with new pads in the new callipers, that may well have subsequently contaminated the pads. The rotors then changed so everything is now contaminated, try new pads and a nice clean set of rotors.

I guess the original installation of the stock Specialized hub and brakes required the rotor being installed with the axle bolt removed

I doubt that very much, is the lock ring splined to the inside or outside, there are deeper internal spline lock-ring tools available, like THIS ONE

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 3:31 pm
Free Member
 

I find most 160mm brakes won't lock up on tarmac (why would they really need to, that'd be way more power than needed on a trail).  29'ers just made that worse as the brakes are effectively working against a bigger lever.  Bear in mind also that a lighter rider will lock up for less effort.  

Having made those excuses, deore and below don't get servo wave so they feel OK initially by lack ultimate power. I've got the trekking version which half makes up for that by having longer 3-finger levers which allows you to run them father inboard for 1 finger power.  Longer term I want to swap the levers for proper XT ones.

As for the front CL, I'm guessing they used a thinner walled tool?  Is yours aluminum of steel?

 

 

 

 

 

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 3:31 pm
Full Member
 

Posted by: steve_b77

Given in your initial description of the issue I would hazard a guess that the rotors were contaminated, to which you appear to have used with new pads in the new callipers, that may well have subsequently contaminated the pads. The rotors then changed so everything is now contaminated, try new pads and a nice clean set of rotors.

This.

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 3:42 pm
bcfse1 reacted
 Yak
Full Member
 

I would start with a really good bedding in of the pads/ rotor. 20 hard stops at least. Should easily lock up a 29er wheel on tarmac under a small sized rider. Any shimano rotor should produce decent braking, not just ice-tech. The ice-tech ones just manage heat better. The M6100s are servowave too so should have good power once the pads contact the disk. You can try an IPA clean of the rotors, and sand the pads to get a 'fresh' start before the bedding in if you suspect contamination. Once you have tried a good bedding in and if they feel good at the lever, but still squeal with no power, then they might have a caliper leak. 

Re the lockring tool. Try removing the hub endcap first. Might just pull off depending on the hub. Or a different tool will be needed with a thinner/deep wall. 

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 3:47 pm
bcfse1 reacted
Free Member
 

The M6100s are servowave

I stand corrected, I thought that was the difference between deore and SLX, the 6100 has servo wave, the 4100 doesn't.

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 4:41 pm
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the replies everyone. I notice that my links to pictures of the lockring+tool were removed but it seems I now have the ability to upload so here are some pics of the lockring tool and axle nut.

The issue isn't so much the depth of the tool but more the thickness of the wall failing to clear the axle. It's hard to see how there could be a lockring adapter with a thinner wall that this but perhaps I need to have a shop around.

IMG20250310111605.jpg IMG20250310111527.jpg 

 

With regards to the braking power in general, that is encouraging.
I have always run 160mm on the rear on all my 26" bikes and was able to lock the rear easily enough to do cool skids in the street. I used to run 145mm I think on my GT LTS 25 years ago.

It is entirely possible that the old rotors contaminated my brand new pads, which then contaminated my brand new rotors.
I always felt that it's easier to just swap the pads than try and decontaminate them but I might try a light sanding as they probably only had about 200m of rolling on the contaminated rotors. And I was under the impression that bathing those old questionable rotors in Peaty's brake cleaner before running them with the new pads would do a decent enough cleaning job but clearly that's not the case.

I will persist with cleaning, replacing and bedding in the pads/rotors and let you know how I get on.

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 4:59 pm
Free Member
 

that's a cup and cone setup? take the lock nut and cone out, keep hold of the bbs and you'll have all the space in the world

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 5:11 pm
Full Member
 

Those cheap Shimano stamped steel rotors are notoriously bad, you can see how shiny they are as they're almost too smooth to create friction. 

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 5:32 pm
 a11y
Full Member
 

Ah ok. That front rotor needs to get in the sea - generally, those low-end 'resin pads only' rotors aren't great. Better off with something like a RT64 (SLX level) that can take metallic pads, although for a smaller/lighter rider resin pads should still be fine. I've never had great success with those cheap resin-only rotors.

Looking at photo above, the locknut on the axle needs to come off for any tool to reach the splines on the locking. Once off, I'd swap to an external locking to avoid same problem again. 

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 5:54 pm
Free Member
 

hmm thought i replied

looks like cup and cone, remove the lock nut and cone, take the ball bearings out and keep safe, you'll have all the space in the world then

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 6:20 pm
Full Member
 

My hunch is that you need better pads. I’ve got 160mm rotors on my gravel bike and cheap rotors. It’s Tiagra levers and posh but still single piston shimano brakes. I’m not short of braking force

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 7:50 pm
Full Member
 

I'm surprised a small is too big at 160mm. My daughter at 157mm is on a small chisel with enough room for a 150mm dropper. She is also running 160mm rotors front and rear with m6100 brakes and appears to have plenty of power.

I'd bet a lot of the weight is in the wheels, mostly the hubs. That and the lower end forks tend to be the boat anchors.

 
Posted : 10/03/2025 9:14 pm
Full Member
Topic starter
 

A brief update on this.
I swapped the SM-RT54 rotors out with the RT64 and that has made a big difference. Sanded down the pads to give a better surface and then spent some decent time actually bedding them in this time with some hard stops. I can come to a nice stop and lock the rear. Front is not as good but even on my 26" machines I'm used to a 180mm rotor on the front so I can't expect the same performance on 29" with 160mm.

So we're all good here.

 
Posted : 20/03/2025 12:03 pm
a11y reacted
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Oh, and the hub was indeed a regular hub and cone so I loosened the opposite side to remove the axle to get full access for my lockring tool. Gave the bearings a good clean-down and re-grease for good measure and added the new rotor using an externally-splined lockring.

Thanks all for the help and advice!

 
Posted : 20/03/2025 3:13 pm
Yak and a11y reacted