Roadies whats your ...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Roadies whats your average speed?

520 Posts
140 Users
0 Reactions
2,004 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

as looking through someone's KOMs recently (he had 40 or so) and they were virtually all <5 people, whether he rides places no one else bothers, or whether he's created some weird ones, but it seemed quite strange they'd overwhelmingly be like that!

A mate of mine has someone at his club who collects KOM. Sort of a hobby I guess. He'll go out specifically to bag obscure segments when the wind is favourable. He's got loads like that where there are only a few rides. Quite bizarre.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 4:14 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I target certain segments on my commute, more interesting than structured interval training, and I won't bother trying if there's a headwind or I'm knackered or whatever, but wouldn't specifically look for those with few riders on them, where's the fun in that!?


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Beats me. It's not like he'll ride the same segments over again to see any improvement (unless someone pinches his KOM and he thinks he can get it back!) Is quite bizarre. But then I have also seen people drive to segments with TT bikes on the back of the car and two up a segment to get a KOM. I just don't get it 😕


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 4:27 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Those people deserved to be stopped at every single red light, whether they're "STRAVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAing" or not.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 4:29 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

I'd guess about 16mph. Some faster some slower, but the average must be about that.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 5:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's a cycling club on Orkney isn't there? Pretty sure I saw some club tops last year when we were in Orkney. If there is then head out with them for a ride and see how you do.

Really enjoyable cycling on Orkney.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 5:36 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

I'm a bit rubbish after reading this. I did a 22 mile undulating loop the other night at 16.05mph.
Must try harder, although I am 58, a good 3stone overweight & don't really 'train' as such.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 5:36 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10065
Free Member
 

This still going?

Well I was quite pleased with a solo 19.3mph on a 67m 2k ascent route a couple of days after a 8.1mph 50.7m 7.5k ascent at afan on the mtb....

I will be breaking the 20mph barrier for a 2hr ride this year. I will.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 6:09 pm
Posts: 15
Full Member
 

Well thanks to all i took the advise and bought a second hand Garmin compliments of fellow STW member yorkshire89. So here is my commute today for those wanting to see it on Strava.

Well, thank Churchill for that! 😉


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 6:31 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Surely average should be over a long period, say a year. These times seem more like average good times, and not those hours on end spent battling wind rain and snow. Otherwise we might as well list our average road race or TT times.
I have a default 100km that I do a lot. Once in 2013 I did it sub three hours, yet the following winter was lucky to average 14mph.
Now your TT times on standard or aero are a good benchmark


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely average should be over a long period, say a year

might be an interesting point but I read the question from the OP as "what are you capable of averaging over a ride?". Bimbling with the wife and kids would impact on a longer average but have no reflection on your ability or give me a yardstick as to what sort of speeds keen roadies like yourself can do.

Whereas

I have a default 100km that I do a lot. Once in 2013 I did it sub three hours

does.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is a bit of a nonsense question really as there are so many variables. Still got to 5 pages though 🙂


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 6:58 pm
Posts: 41700
Free Member
 

15.5mph on my commute home today.

However my BMI puts me in the 'hard to kidnap' category.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 7:30 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I consider my best strava segment a 17/1340 on a local 5.2km section of road. I do recall how fast I was going that day, and did of course have a tailwind.

If I go out on the hybrid bike it's usually 2 hrs and around 18mph average, or 16mph if I'm doing intervals. Most rides will have 500-800m climbing in this distance.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 7:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

OMG, is that your commute?

I commuted to work through London today

Yep that's it, not a traffic light within 30 miles 😀

Well, thank Churchill for that!

😀 if it wasn't for him it would be an iron man each day to work 😀

Context is really important. Look at Eric in second place on that KOM and it's clear he was out for a relatively steady 25 miler, not someone who was on a 4 mile blast. A KOM is pretty hollow really unless there's a few hundred times on there and on a reasonable climb or part of a local TT course. I'd rather be top 10 on a very busy segment than KOM on a segment only half a dozen people have actually ridden.

Totally agree, i was fresh after lunch and first bit of the blast, did the same 2 seconds slower in the morning on the way to work. To be fair though i did come in second on another one last thing after back and forth four times [url= https://www.strava.com/activities/281693669/segments/6602548376 ]here[/url]

You would be pushed to find many segments in Orkney that more than 10 people had ridden!!! 😀


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On planet earth as 50ish bloke with a passion for rump steak, red wine, ale and cheese who lives in one of the most benign cycling counties in the UK and does about 8k km a year I would be happy with any proper ride (50 to 200km) over 30kph average in the summer and around 26/7 kph in the winter.

Its a poor measure though go somewhere hilly and I've turned myself inside out for 23kph.


 
Posted : 08/04/2015 8:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

These times seem more like average good times, and not those hours on end spent battling wind rain and snow.

Oldgit is right, makes a big difference...

A tired 50 miles at z2 power at 7pm in mid January with drizzly freezing temps on the heavy winter bike in heavy winter layers... 18.7 mph.

An hour and a quarter lunchtime (z2 with 30 min tempo) spin in the sun yesterday on the race bike... 20.7 mph.

The latter was significantly more enjoyable 🙂


 
Posted : 09/04/2015 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oh and forgot to mention, i was wearing my work cloths-shirt, jumper, trousers & shoes no Lycra or or cleats 😀


 
Posted : 09/04/2015 2:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On the shopping bike with a weekly shop in the basket towing a trailer with two kids and a dog in the back...?

, i was wearing my work cloths-shirt, jumper, trousers & shoes

I'd not be wanting the desk next to yours 😉


 
Posted : 09/04/2015 2:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

On the shopping bike with a weekly shop in the basket towing a trailer with two kids and a dog in the back...?

, i was wearing my work cloths-shirt, jumper, trousers & shoes

I'd not be wanting the desk next to yours

😆 😆

Fellow cyclist in the desk next to me so quite amiable to a bit of sweat. 🙄


 
Posted : 12/04/2015 5:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did my first 200km audax last month, only 3rd ride of the year due to illness (which is now back) rode an average 23km/hr. Hilly route from Halifax-Lancaster-Halifax.


 
Posted : 12/04/2015 6:04 pm
 Spud
Posts: 361
Full Member
 

I seem to be perpetually stuck around 15-16 mph, try as i might it doesn't get quicker. I think that's just my lot in life!


 
Posted : 12/04/2015 6:25 pm
Posts: 32592
Full Member
 

Spud - same here 🙄

Went out on my first roadie club ride in years this morning, hoping they would spur me on, but I managed to drag them down to my level though* 😀

Serves them right for dragging me round 50 miles and just shy of 5000 feet of climbing with that godawful headwind.

*and many thanks to them for not letting me get too far behind, slowing down for me, occasionally stopping at the top of hills and giving me a wheel to desperately cling to when required.


 
Posted : 12/04/2015 6:47 pm
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

I averaged 7mph on a ride from Bonar Bridge to Ledmore Junction a few years ago. 30 miles, and I even had gears on the bike for once. Bit of a headwind, the road signs were fluttering. The other 90 miles were a bit faster. 🙂

I usually aim to average 10mph overall. I'm going faster than that, but I'm a great believer in stopping for tea and cakes, so that adds to the trip time and reduces the average. 🙂

If the scenery is boring I might do 15 miles in the hour.


 
Posted : 12/04/2015 10:03 pm
Posts: 50
Full Member
 

My fastest ever recorded ride was 84 miles at 20.6mph, which was Hudds to Tadcaster and back over terrain best described as rolling. That's the only ride I've ever managed to get an average of over 20mph. My fastest 100 took 5h 2m for an age of 19.9mph! I think (all my rides are on Endomondo and I cba to check back) that there's around 3500ft of climbing for both those rides, but they were club runs with plenty of rotation on the front and in good summer conditions. The fastest I've managed solo is about 35 miles at 19.5mph over a flattish (mebbes 1200ft ascent) training loop that's an out-and-back with plenty of traffic lights etc.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 7:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

According to my cycle computer I've done 287 miles in april so far at 11.2 mph so i'm a bit slow :-),but my 'road' bike is a thorn xtc with heavy marathon tyres,mudguards and a rack so I,m not excactly on a road ride to do fast miles,more just on a ride.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 7:49 am
Posts: 34491
Full Member
 

It's all about context.

"from the door" ride where i used to live in Oxfordshire was 59miles @18mph with about 1500ft of gain. Having moved to Heptonstall my "from the door" loop is now 23 miles but has 2300ft of gain and average speed is 15mph.

In my defence (ahem) 😳 the weather's been a bit shit, It'll be great to get some longer rides in though.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 8:05 am
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

The bike does make quote a difference. I'm normally stuck around 15mph but that's on the tourer. I was out a few days ago on the carbon roadie and managed 17mph over a course of 73 miles and 3,800 feet of ascent.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 8:08 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

A tired 50 miles at z2 power at 7pm in mid January with drizzly freezing temps on the heavy winter bike in heavy winter layers... 18.7 mph.

I'm not singling you out just using your time/distance/ave as an example.
I amazed at some of these averages posted that terrain must have a massive bearing on the average either that or GPS is actually not that accurate. I am just getting back into road riding after a years absence due to work but I used to ride with a group of friends every week that were basically animals on the bike, I had to be on top form to hang in the middle of the group and at the start of the year was being dropped on the climbs but slowly made progress by tasting the vomit in your mouth as you desperately tried to stop the elastic snapping. But the more I rode with them I slowly made it to mid pack obscurity and sometimes due to doing zero work on the front (they were happy with this as they know I'm not fast) even finished the ride quite strong.
The people in this group feature heavily in the top ten strava round my local riding which is basically all the routes South from a famous crystal palace cycling cafe down into the kent lanes, this area attracts riders from all over london so is not a cycling backwater.
Some of the group race and a are 1's 2's 3's and good 4's and one is a strong hillclimer and had finished top 5 in the bec and catford hillclimbs beating david millar in the process, they are also training to ride 40cols in a week in the Alps so are all doing local hill reps before work.
My point? On a group ride 50-70 miles venturing into the pain cave with some nutty through and off on fast sections at 32mph and long drags climbed at double figures the average will be 17.5-18mph.
I can't work out if you fat MTB'ers riding solo are super strong and should be racing as you will be make cat1 in a season, total bullshitters or live in Cambridgeshire?


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 8:27 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I reckon flat landers being paced by a 7.5 ton truck 😆


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 9:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not singling you out just using your time/distance/ave as an example.

Example was a real solo ride in jan this year. In west Berks so more rolling than hilly, only 1545ft of elevation according to Strava, but it was meant to be a steady z2 so avoided bigger climbs.

It is sort of the point I was trying to make about it being a bit of a nonsense metric for comparison.

Probably more meaningful to state things like duration, NP and TSS as these are irrespective of conditions.

fat MTB'ers riding solo

🙂


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 9:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Asking roadies how fast they ride is like asking fishermen what's the largest fish they've caught.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 9:56 am
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

Maybe the notion that all the fastest riders are racing is flawed and all that leg-shaving, embrocation, doping and stuff is just a sham.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 9:59 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Example was a real solo ride in jan this year. In west Berks so more rolling than hilly, only 1545ft of elevation according to Strava, but it was meant to be a steady z2 so avoided bigger climbs.

Unless you specifically cherry picked that ride though, and/or the weather was monstrously windy (and behind you the whole way) that is very quick for a solo "zone 2" ride in January! Which I'm sure you know.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Just to add to MrSmiths comments (and Oldgits too) I ride out with RCC in London and on the 1st group Saturdays ride they have a drop policy, 30ks ave in and around South East London, the bumpy bits. The group is meant to capture 1,2,3 racers or of that ilk in training and they fly along. I've ridden with them quite a few times and whilst I stay with them, on the return into town I pace off because I just can't hack for that long over that distance at that pace. That's 18.4 mph ave over 3 hours around the bumpy bits of either Kent or North Downs of Surrey.

I'd like to invite some of you out onto one of our rides someday. This Saturday perhaps ?

All this "ave this, ave that" is pure conjecture, there are so many variables to take into consideration that any segment/ride has to be taken in a one off segment. A blow out, strong tail wind, paced, whatever, but average I'd wager they aren't....


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 10:07 am
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

You need to set some constraints on the question then, e.g.

There-and-back or circular routes only.
Solo.
Minimum distance and height gain.

Then you might get some more consistent and comparable answers.

Inevitably, folk will pick their "best" average for willy-waving purposes.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 10:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unless I'm targeting specific zones, I aim for 20mph no matter what the terrain. For my ability, it's a good benchmark and forces me to press on no matter what the road is doing. I mostly train solo.

Chaingangs can easily creep towards 30mph average speed if you're riding with well-drilled lads...

For reference, Cat 2/3 peloton fodder, 23 min 10 and 56 min 25.

Fastest 100 was 4hr36 (22mph).

More Stannard than Froome. Happiest when eating wind on <7% roads.

Mostly ride in the Lancashire Pennines, average 1000m ascent for every 50 miles covered.

And can we stop talking in k's?

G

(Here's a Wednesday night team ride, a few stops to wait for slower lads... https://www.strava.com/activities/281733074#6603333442)


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unless you specifically cherry picked that ride though, and/or the weather was monstrously windy (and behind you the whole way) that is very quick for a solo "zone 2" ride in January! Which I'm sure you know.

Actually picked because it was very typical! Just pretty flat. FWIW, average power and NP both around 225w for that ride. I have worked on my road bike position quite a bit to make it more aero and bring it closer to the TT bike position, made a big difference to my avg speed.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 10:16 am
Posts: 8880
Free Member
 

I propose a loop of coniston as the ultimate benchmark. Short, bumpy, fast in places twisty in others.

Me, giving it beans, on a near perfect evening, barely 30km/h for an hour and a bit

https://www.strava.com/activities/281678738


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 10:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You're luck to have the Coniston loop as your local evening ride! I love that road...

I have a 20 mile evening loop - it's exactly 20 miles door-to-door and I know I have to bury myself to average 20mph. It finishes with a 4 mile steady climb - I've almost killed myself trying to keep that average speed figure from dropping too much!

G


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:04 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Hang on...

I aim for 20mph no matter what the terrain. For my ability, it's a good benchmark and forces me to press on no matter what the road is doing. I mostly train solo.

I have a 20 mile evening loop - it's exactly 20 miles door-to-door and I know I have to bury myself to average 20mph.

So 20mph is a "good benchmark for your ability" regardless of distance, terrain etc, and yet you have a one hour route where it's a struggle? Does not compute...


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unless I'm targeting specific zones, I aim for 20mph no matter what the terrain.

Favourable conditions and you'll likely be riding too easy. Tough conditions and you might be riding way too hard. Also doesn't take form (increases and decreases) or any progression into account. Is a bit of a useless metric to train to.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Njee, f you have a look at the route, it has a few traffic lights early on and finishes with a long climb. If I get lucky with the lights, you can get round in 55 mins, if I do it in rush hour, I often get snarled up at the M6 Tickled Trout junction, and then you have to play catch-up on the final climb.

I like the route because it's quite challenging...

Is a bit of a useless metric to train to.

I don't 'train to it', but it does seem to average itself out on the type of routes I do. I said I "aim for it", if my average is 17mph and I'm 20 miles from home, I'd expect to make that up on the home leg...

For reference, I live about 5-10 miles away from the start of the climbs around the Forest of Bowland so the homeward leg is usually a fast lick back down from the fells.

It's always been a benchmark for rides, older riders will be familiar with the term "evens".

G


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:15 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

if my average is 17mph and I'm 20 miles from home, I'd expect to make that up on the home leg...

As in get home in an hour, or get home with an ride average speed of 20mph? If you've done 40 miles to get to 17mph then you need to average 31mph to get home with a 20mph average...?

If you just mean to get home from that point in an hour then that would be a 17.9mph average, which isn't 20mph however you slice it 😕


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:25 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Just trying to understand what you've written. I like things to make sense. Much funnier to just hurl insults eh?


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:39 am
Posts: 5141
Full Member
 

As always on these threads there is a differnce between what I see out on the roads and what people on here claim to do 😕


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As always on these threads there is a differnce between what I see out on the roads and what people on here claim to do

Really? I think there's just a wide cross section of riders on here (and out there.) If I have a scan down the strava feed for my local club, or the STW TrainerRoad group (and I'm sure the STW strava group if there is such a thing) it's pretty much the sort of variety seen on this thread. Nothing unusual. Add in regional terrain variations etc. and you have an even wider spread.

Edit... as an example, the STW TR group, although a small sample, has riders with w/kg all the way from 2 to 5. Quite a spread!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:03 pm
Posts: 15988
Free Member
 

My average roadie speed is about 45 mph. I was expecting it to be much higher seeing as though at some points I get to the national speed limit.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I posted a link to a typical ride - last Wednesday's usual team training ride. The average speed was 18.5mph which included a few stops at the tops of climbs waiting for some slower lads.

But you'll always get some bellend that pulls you up and tells you that your claims are wildly different from reality.

If bellends like that took the time to look at the profile, they'd be able to see those stops. But they're probably too busy looking smug and wondering why nobody ever invites them on a group ride 😉


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:14 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

The average speed was 18.5mph which included a few stops at the tops of climbs waiting for some slower lads.

Average speed is based on moving not elapsed time


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:31 pm
Posts: 23300
Free Member
 

Average speed is based on moving not elapsed time

I bet you quote in KM/H as well to try and make it sound more impressive.

average speed should be based on door to door.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stopping and starting lowers average speed significantly compared to riding through.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Edit... as an example, the STW TR group, although a small sample, has riders with w/kg all the way from 2 to 5. Quite a spread!

is it awfully cynical to assume that some STW riders are a little heavier than they're owning up to?


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

is it awfully cynical to assume that some STW riders are a little heavier than they're owning up to?

Must admit I'm more inclined to update mine if it goes down than if it goes up!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:49 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I posted a link to a typical ride - last Wednesday's usual team training ride. The average speed was 18.5mph which included a few stops at the tops of climbs waiting for some slower lads.

You've piqued my interest with your now deleted outburst, but I just looked at about 15 of your rides chosen at random from the last year, and didn't find one that was anything like 20mph, 18.4 as per the one you linked appears to be the fastest I can see (save for a 10 mile TT). They're nearly all in the 15-17mph range.

There's nothing wrong with this whatsoever, but it does basically affirm that threads like this are just willy waving exercises.

Maybe we should just declare our Strava YTD average - mine is 15.05mph, dragged down by mountain biking!

Must admit I'm more inclined to update mine if it goes down than if it goes up!

Damn right - if you do an FTP test and the number is lower it's because you're tired, and not rested, or that you've lost tonnes of weight.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:50 pm
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

[quote=gatsby ]
Mostly ride in the Lancashire Pennines, average 1000m ascent for every 50 miles covered.
And can we stop talking in k's?
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I suspect there might be calibration issues on a trainerroad group too.

This question arises at least every couple of months, usually posted by a newby that is the self-proclaimed gnarliest mtb rider on the local evening pub ride and is disappointed that he's not smashing Strava segs every time he rides his roadbike.

There's never going to be a right or wrong answer, the only way to see how you compare to others is to ride some TTs, (dragstrips and sporting courses), maybe do a bit of racing or ride sportives... Cos let's face it, everyone rides flat out in sportives.

Njee, I ride mountain bikes too. If you scrolled back over the winter months, that's mostly what you've been looking at. 🙄


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:56 pm
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

But isn't racing a very different thing again? (TTs aside) Surely then it's not just the fastest rider that wins it's also about racecraft and tactics.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 12:59 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

And which is better?

I've got friends that can beast me out on a ride, but I can beat them in a race. They push themselves harder in training, whilst I can up it more for racing. Who's faster?


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got friends

Sorry, I can't take any of the rest of this post seriously.

But isn't racing a very different thing again?

To a certain extend, although it depends on the type of racing. But that's why I suggested a broad spectrum of different activities to compare your form to others.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:03 pm
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

[quote=njee20 ]And which is better?
I've got friends that can beast me out on a ride, but I can beat them in a race. They push themselves harder in training, whilst I can up it more for racing. Who's faster?
Faster isn't up for debate. As I said above, there's more to racing than being the fastest.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:05 pm
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

I have just got a lovely new road bike a few weeks ago and I bought my first GPS computer (Garmin Edge 200) to go with it.

I have ridden 5 rides on the new one and I am significantly faster than on my winter training bike. I put it down to much lighter bike, increased fitness and nicer weather.

However, the Garmin records my average speed over the total 301 miles as 20.2 mph which seems too good to be true!

The Garmin definitely struggles to get a good signal on wooded road climbs which I am less impressed with as the speed goes up and down a lot. Is this normal?

I am an old school rider and have always tried to break 'evens' as a target. It was a good training ride when I managed this around Surrey. I live in Epsom so normally have a long climb home at the end of the ride. I have to admit that I was a rider in one of the South East's top sponsored road teams for over 10 years.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scotroutes, expanding on my last point, the majority of the racing I did was crit racing, where usually, the majority of finishers get roughly the same average speed. So yes, position and sprinting ability were what won the points.

If you want to know how fast you are, there's really no substitute for a time trial. If you want to know how you compare on climbs, try some hill-climb comps.

But everyone is different, and we all ride different areas/routes, so comparisons are pretty futile.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 50
Full Member
 

I'm signed up to the STW 500 mile/month group, so all my stats are there to browse through at will. Sunday mornings are usually Club rides, unless I'm 'racing' the MTB somewhere, so my fastest rides will be on that day.
I think my 'total' average is around the 14mph mark across all rides, which will mainly be down to MTB rides and that I lead the Steady Eddies Tues Club run where I lead from the back and always climb with the slowest rider on the night.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This thread is entirely pointless as average speed comes with so many caveats: distance, terrain, traffic, type of road and surface, number of riders, type of riders, bike choice, weather. There's an awful lot of meaningless willy-waving going on.

Also, measurements should be metric. It's much easier and it makes more sense.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Time trials - the race of truth!

Though having said that you can still buy speed.

Maybe the question should have been "Roadies what's your w/kg?" or "Roadies what's your 20MP?". A "Roadies what have you done to improve your average speed?" thread would have been interesting too.

There's nothing wrong with this whatsoever, but it does basically affirm that threads like this are just willy waving exercises.

Still, it's been quite entertaining 🙂

I suspect there might be calibration issues on a trainerroad group too.

Probably, but good enough I reckon to illustrate the point.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also, measurements should be metric. It's much easier and it makes more sense.

Nonsense... Distance should be in miles, vertical ascent should be in metres. A person's height should be in feet, weight in stone, bike sizes in cm and weight in kilos...

Now [i]that[/i] makes sense... 😉


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:13 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Faster isn't up for debate

Wasn't querying your comment that race winner doesn't necessarily equal faster, was merely asking a similar question - who is 'faster', the person who can race quicker (call it TTing or mountain biking where race craft is less relevant) or the person who does training rides quicker?

Njee, I ride mountain bikes too. If you scrolled back over the winter months, that's mostly what you've been looking at.

Nope, gave you the benefit of the doubt there and looked at summer rides, most of us slow down significantly over winter after all.

[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/129357893 ]16.2[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/164233817 ]16.5[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/153928246 ]16.9[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/141191637 ]18.1[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/152426572 ]17.9[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/264771029 ]15.2[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/262604298 ]15.2[/url]
[url= https://www.strava.com/activities/267894954 ]16.2[/url]

Again - chosen completely at random, apologies if I've chosen rides where you were riding slowly, but they're all between April and August... You're among friends, there's no reason to show off!

Distance should be in miles, vertical ascent should be in metres.

Never! Miles and feet. Bike weights in pounds, but parts in grammes (up to wheels), FS frames in pounds, hardtails and road frames in grammes. People weight in kg, height in feet!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 43603
Full Member
 

[quote=gatsby ]Nonsense... Distance should be in miles, vertical ascent should be in metres. A person's height should be in feet, weight in stone, bike sizes in cm and weight in kilos...
Now that makes sense... Headsets should be internally imperial and externally metric....


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Njee, without resorting to being as big a bellend as your good self, let's have a look at some of the rides you've chosen.

One is called "Dragging Poorly Dave Round the Trough of Bowland".
Now, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that the pace might have been affected by "Poorly Dave", does it.

Another is called "Ride Home stopping off to see big stack at the CDNW Crits". That was a gentle recovery spin home from a time trial, in which I averaged over 25mph. 🙄

"Guild Wheel Anti-clockwise" is a mountain bike ride. 22 miles at 16.5mph on a mountain bike is rather respectable.

Sadly, I've got better things to do that go through your list, but I will point out one other thing. You highlighted a ride in April 2014 which was quite slow. You'll notice that there was a significant break prior to that which was also the reason you'll not see any racing for the last 2 seasons.

Early last year I contracted a rather nasty little illness called Lyme disease. I don't know if you know what that is, but you'll probably quickly google it, like David Brent googling Dostoyevsky on the Office.
As that was the first ride back from a rather debilitating illness, I thought it best to try and keep below threshold.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:25 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Another is called "Ride Home stopping off to see big stack at the CDNW Crits". That was a gentle recovery spin home from a time trial, in which I averaged over 25mph

No, you averaged [url= https://www.strava.com/activities/164233820 ]23.4mph[/url]. Sorry, this is quite good fun now!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:30 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Erm, anyone exaggerating their speed is only cheating themselves surely? No need to get all Sherlock Holmes about it.

I know via Strava some people do manage to average 20mph - but it usually seems to be shortish, flatish rides in a small group.

I ride solo and I don't think I average above 18mph even on a good day - and that's when I'm not looking for hills (though it's hard to avoid them locally).


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

aim for 20mph no matter what the terrain

In his defence he did say he'd aim for 20mph, not necessarily achieve 🙂


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apologies Njee, still significantly higher than 20mph though.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In his defence he did say he'd aim for 20mph, not necessarily achieve

He won't hear you, he's too busy pouring over my strava files with his calculator.

I suppose I should be flattered...


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:36 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

In his defence he did say he'd aim for 20mph, not necessarily achieve

I nearly said that. 😆 I aim for 52mph average on my rides.

Apologies Njee, still significantly higher than 20mph though.

Yes, for a 10 mile TT! Sadly the thread isn't "testers, what's your average speed?".

You'll be pleased to hear that I'll stop now. Suffice to say I'll file your "20mph regardless" claim under 'amusing STW fantasy chest beating', and move on! Corking example of why these threads are daft.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:37 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

Njee, without resorting to being as big a bellend as your good self

Now now, play nice, he may have picked holes in your statements but I don't think he's actually been directly rude to you.

Just give us links to all the > 20mph average rides you've done (which naturally will be significant in number if your original statement is true?), and the matter will be settled 😉

The problem with stuff like this is that if people go round inflating their figures and exaggerating it devalues the discussion and becomes a 'fishermans tale' style bragging contest rather than actual comparisons, the data doesn't lie (much), and for people genuinely trying to get better and wondering about their own performance then it helps to have real data to compare to, it could be very demoralising for someone trying to get into the sport reading threads of posters spouting about all their 20mph+ rides, thinking they'll never get there or are too slow to go out for a ride with people like that as they can 'only' average 17.5, when in reality the figures are much lower and they could join in and would feel better about their own performance and goals.

Although as loads of others have said, comparing averages with different people on different days on different terrain in different weather is never gonna give you much to go on.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know via Strava some people do manage to average 20mph - but it usually seems to be shortish, flatish rides in a small group.

Seriously, it's not that fast solo. If you are a decent club TT rider you'll be looking to at least get under an hour for a 25. Out recent club 25, the top 8 out of 27 all under an hour, so 25+mph. Ok this is on a TT bike with all the aero accompaniments but you'll still need 280+ watts for an hour (depending on how aero you are.) Winning time was 52:49 and I think he was doing over 360W.

If you can do that then a not too lumpy 20mph solo for two or three hours is probably around high z2 / low z3. Not a huge effort. (This is assuming good position, as over 18mph I think about 80% of power goes into overcoming wind resistance. I think most people could improve their averages just by addressing this, certainly those relatively new to road bikes.)


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just give us links to all the > 20mph average rides you've done (which naturally will be significant in number if your original statement is true?)

[url= https://app.strava.com/activities/72400062 ]Here's a hundred miler at 22mph...[/url]

[url= https://app.strava.com/activities/173686706 ]There's a 25...[/url]

[url= https://app.strava.com/activities/271310358 ]Here's a lumpy 20 on the winter bike...[/url]

I could go on, but a) I've not got as much time on my hands as Njee and b), I'm just not that much of a bellend.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here's a hundred miler at 22mph...

99.9 according to strava 😉

I'm just not that much of a bellend.

Can we stop with the bellend thing, it's making you sound like a bit of a bellend.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 1:51 pm
Page 3 / 7