Forum menu
ramblers = tossers
 

[Closed] ramblers = tossers

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hi this was a law introduced by Labour called โ€œopen accessโ€

I was really thinking a bit further back than then. Kinder Trespass was in 1932 - and we all got the right to ramble on Kinder Scout thanks to some people walking where they shouldn't have been.

So doesn't that make it somewhat hypocritical of ramblers to complain about cyclists on footpaths (if they're not doing any harm or being dangerous)?

To be fair, 99% of the people I meet are perfectly civil.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 6:55 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

TJ how is it a fact that ramblers get startled by being spoken to from behind? Have you conducted a statistically relevant survey you've not told us about?

I tried a bell. My experience was that ramblers didn't hear it when they were talking. I took it off.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 6:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have never heard so much rubbish in all my life

I take it you've not read many of TJ's posts then?

I don't use a bell for a few reasons:
- all that ping, pinging strikes of arrogance and seems rather rude
- I've got a voice so don't need a bell
- I've got hope hubs which are probably noisier than a bell anyway
- A lot of the walkers/runners have headphones on (or are deaf) so wouldn't hear the bell anyway.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Zulu-Eleven - Member

It is illegal to cycle on a footpath in fact it is clearly stated on OS maps I have one in my hand now.

Please, please brandeberryj, stop now before you embarrass yourself any further...

An excellent counter arguement?? Thats irony by the way


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Teh fact that the ramblers expect a bell

Why would they expect a bell, given 99.993% of cyclists don't use one and it's not a legal requirement that they do?

I walk more than I cycle and would never "expect" a cyclist to have a bell.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FOG HORNS MAKE BIDDYS DIVE INTO BUSHES,,,,,, **** HIL-AIR-IOUS.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cynic-al - Member
TJ how is it a fact that ramblers get startled by being spoken to from behind? Have you conducted a statistically relevant survey you've not told us about?

I tried a bell. My experience was that ramblers didn't hear it when they were talking. I took it off.

Quite right all that is reasonably required is for them (cyclist)to let a walker know there coming past. I am quite often startled by a cyclist no matter what method they use. BIG DEAL so what? It is not like you are being shot at. Is the idiot TJ saying farmer Giles should not use a bird scarer??? Because they will certainly startle you a hell off a lot more than a cyclist letting you know he is there no matter what method he is using to do so.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:09 pm
Posts: 32
Free Member
 

My grandmother used to complain about cyclists never using their bells. We went for a walk and promptly a cyclist came up behind and rang their bell and I stood aside while my grandmother kept walking. The cyclist went around her and then she turned to me and said: "See there was another one!"

Getting walkers attention very early on, leads cyclist not to slow down enough when passing them, as you might have got the impression that they have spent a long time waiting for you to catch them up so you better overtake them quickly to let them get on with it...then they get cross because you have gone too fast.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rubberneck - Member
FOG HORNS MAKE BIDDYS DIVE INTO BUSHES,,,,,, **** HIL-AIR-IOUS.

Hi rubberneck
You must tell me are all the members of your family retarded?


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The local coffin dodgers round my way can't hear a bell even if I had one salvaged from the Titanic fitted to my frame so TJ's "just ring a bell from a couple of km away" comments are pure BULLSHINE.

FACT!


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ's [s]"just ring a bell from a couple of km away"[/s] comments are pure BULLSHINE

Fixed that for you... ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicsteve - Member

I don't use a bell for a few reasons:
- all that ping, pinging strikes of arrogance and seems rather rude

I agree with you but my experience is that walkers prefer it. Look at all the folk who have had people complaining you don't have a bell. I think the key is to use the bell a distance away and then to say thanks as you pass

- I've got a voice so don't need a bell

However you can use a bell from much further away than you can use your voice unless you shout - which is then rude

- I've got hope hubs which are probably noisier than a bell anyway

To some extent - but it doesn't work uphill and again walkers expect a bell.

- A lot of the walkers/runners have headphones on (or are deaf) so wouldn't hear the bell anyway.

some - but the rest do

One of the biggest complaints against cyclists ( along with pavement riding and red light jumping) is they don't use bells. So why not use one?

It really does help smooth the way in my experience and that of many others -


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How you guys can say a bell does not work when you don't use one is rather funny.

I ride most days on shared paths, use a bell a lot and it smooths the way - when used politely and backed with thanks once you have attracted their attention.

Waht is your reason for not wanting to have one?


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:21 pm
Posts: 6253
Free Member
 

generally agree with the OP's sweeping statement!

ive had mixed ones though, to a couple of ramblers being really nice and friendly, to a couple of ramblers being absoulte arseholes, i have also had a group of ramblers refuse to acknowledge i was even there (on a bridleway) i waiting patiently for all to pass, and not a one of the sods bothered to say thanks.....ive also had numerous occasions where, i was already on a descent, they have refused to move aside making me come to a stop (YES i understand, why should they move, but its a wide section which would be easy for walkers to move aside, not so for the mtb'er)....

the negative experiences far outweigh the positives ive had from them, so i would say the majority are tossa's

i also spoke to couple today, said hello (proper ramblers, hiking socks the lot) and they totally totally blanked me, .we were in the middle of nowhere, and no one else around....not even a HELLO! tossa's!

that said ill still always say hi if pass and try to make the effort...if they turn arsey, then its verbal war time!


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ANYBODY WHOS MTB'D IN GERMANY WILL NOTice how its so different over there to here,,,, almost as if the walkers are sorry for getting in your way and the lads/lasses on bikes almost curse you for being on their trails, my experiance of over there anyway,,,,,, thinking of emigrating me.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How you guys can say a bell does not work when you don't use one is rather funny.

I used to have one on my commuter bike, found it to be next to useless, so don't fit one now. I'm a very polite rider though, however if I was one of those arrogant ones who pings their bell and [b]expects[/b] walkers to jump out of their way then my view might differ...

Far too many people don't hear or have headphones on, so it's necessary to act as if they haven't heard anyway. Even pinging from a good distance back people often seemed startled by the bell.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:24 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

So TJ you are speaking from your experience alone...and that's better than the experience of the various people who are disagreeing with you?

Funny I recall you slating me for something similar recently...

One of the biggest complaints against cyclists ( along with pavement riding and red light jumping) is they don't use bells.

Any evidence for that for example?


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i had a case the other week with rambblers standing in the middle of the briddle way about 15-20 of them. did move or attempt top move. one stood there with his hands on his hips so i stopped and had a little word only tyo find out he was and english man telling a welsh man i shouldnt be riding there!! it was my local ride and on common land, i think of he wasnt 50+ i might of given him a swift lefty!!
please note nothing against english but im sure an english man wouldnt like a welsh lad to say to stop riding in his land!!


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to live in Germany and did ride a bike while there (not mountain biking but certainly on shared paths). Quite a lot of their cyclists were like TJ - they thought that once they'd pinged their bell they were within their rights to fly past without slowing down, not caring for who they endangered.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:27 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

In my 20 years of riding I can't recall a walker ever commenting that I shouldve had a bell. I either shout a polite 'excuse me please' or if they don't hear then just slow down until they notice me, then thank them for mving over. Most of them are fine, it's only in bad weather when they're togged up like they're going up the north face of the eiger that they don't hear you. No chance of me ever fitting a bell, it's not a penny farthing!


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most walkers I meet are intrigued / impressed by seeing MTBers on some of the trails. I really don't know where all this supposed aggro comes from.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

brandeberryj

...you have no idea whatsoever what they do in the rest of Europe and you should keep your snidey racist remarks to yourself.

But you're quite happy to use the term "nasty little jock"

Calling someone "retarded" isn't cool either.

You seem to have quite an empty head perched on that well chipped shoulders of yours.

Troll/idiot of the year.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:28 pm
 nuke
Posts: 5803
Full Member
 

I'm still agreeing with TJ ๐Ÿ˜›

To me having a bell is an additional way of alerting walkers to your presence and can be used further away than voice (The earlier walkers are aware of your presence the better in my mind). A bell won't work everytime and therefore you can use your voice but, in the majority, it does work.

Plus to those that say a bell is rude/arrogant (Not that anyone has ever complained about me having a bell), I would have thought shouting loud enough to be heard from 30yards away is far ruder sounding than tinging a bell.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicsteve - that is not what I do. Wahtever gives you that idea? I am very polite as anyone who rides with me will agree.

Thats just typical - make up something to attack people with when yo know you do not have an answer.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nuke - Member
I would have thought shouting loud enough to be heard from 30yards away is far ruder sounding than tinging a bell.

Not, apparently, if you do it in a humorous way.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

luked2 - Member

Hi this was a law introduced by Labour called โ€œopen accessโ€

I was really thinking a bit further back than then. Kinder Trespass was in 1932 - and we all got the right to ramble on Kinder Scout thanks to some people walking where they shouldn't have been.

So doesn't that make it somewhat hypocritical of ramblers to complain about cyclists on footpaths (if they're not doing any harm or being dangerous)?

To be fair, 99% of the people I meet are perfectly civil.


No! still illegal. Once a law is introduced then that changes everything. If what you say is right any trespass would have lead to the right to ramble. So what probably happened was a law was introduced to stop further trespass. Remember judges interpret the law then parliament decided to introduce something to stop that particular interpretation. Furthermore all rights of way are a product of trespass they are the result of people taking shortcuts to get to work or the shop or even the pub (note during the industrial revolution small factories were everywhere so farmer Giles just gave in and let people use his land as a shortcut) and as I have constantly stated cyclist or not in the habit of using footpaths anyway.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

B-BERRY, WHY WOULD ALL THE MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY BE RETARDED BECAUSE I HAVE GROWN SICK OF BEING TOLD TO USE A BELL BY 'DAILY MAIL READING' BIDDYS ONLY TO FIND THEM TO 'JUMP OUT OF THE WAY' AS MUCH AS IF THEY HAVE NOT HEARD ONE,,,, THE AMOUNTG OF TIMES I HAVE CRAWLED UP TO A GROUP OF WALKERS ONLY TO HEAR ONE OF THE GROUP HISTERICALY SCREAM ''BIKE'' AND WATCH THEM DIVE INTO BUSHES LIKE ITS A RAMPAGING BULL,,,, YOu (whoops capslock) cannot win.

PS for you information i have a cousin who has downs syndrome,,, PRICK.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:32 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Swift kick to the back of the knee, they go down like a sack of spuds and create awesome additional trail obstacles for your following mates


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

druidh - Member

Most walkers I meet are intrigued / impressed by seeing MTBers on some of the trails. I really don't know where all this supposed aggro comes from.

On the urban shared trails and in englandshire mainly ๐Ÿ˜‰

It seems to me that he further north, ( maybe further from London) the further from the towns and the worse the weather the better respoonse you get from walkers.

Only had one tiny bit of aggro even in the pentlands/ Never out in the mountains, a bit on the north edinburgh cycleway / urban WOL path


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I really don't know where all this supposed aggro comes from.

The only place I occasionally see issues are on the WOL shared path, and when that does happen it's just due to one or both parties being incosiderate.

One one hand there are the TJ types who ping-ping-ping their self-important way down expecting everyone to move over so they can maintain their speed, then there are the walkers and runners (especially the latter) with headphones on who never look behind and are known to swerve at in-opportune moments. Add to that some MTBers who ride home from the Pentlands like they were being timed on a downhill course (and treat walkers and other cyclists as obstacles), plus groups of (often middle-aged) walkers actively looking to be offended (even when they've heard a bell or bike coming up behind they won't give any consideration).

I tend to avoid the WOL at weekends in the summer...


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

M6TTF, i'll try that next time!! haha


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The last TBC/STW ride-out

[img] [/img]

(TJ in the middle)


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rubberneck - Member

.......THE AMOUNTG OF TIMES I HAVE CRAWLED UP TO A GROUP OF WALKERS ONLY TO HEAR ONE OF THE GROUP HISTERICALY SCREAM ''BIKE'' AND WATCH THEM DIVE INTO BUSHES LIKE ITS A RAMPAGING BULL,,,, YOu (whoops capslock) cannot win.

It in that situation that a ping from a distance away[i] sometimes[/i] helps


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicsteve

One one hand there are the TJ types who ping-ping-ping their self-important way down expecting everyone to move over so they can maintain their speed,

Why do you keep saying this? You have never seen me ride or you wouldn't say I do this. I don't.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

It in that situation that a ping from a distance away sometimes helps

broken record...


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What? throwing a broken record at them helps?

With that and the red nose, I'm going to need a bigger Camelback


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:38 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

Last years secret santa is far more effective at getting people's attention than a bell - a squigy darth vadar head horn. Brilliant.

That and proII's.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

PS for you information i have a cousin who has downs syndrome,,, PRICK.

Don't be so hard on him then FFS.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:42 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

TJ are you just ignoring me now?

I'll take that as acceptance of defeat if so.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Lol @allthepies


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:45 pm
Posts: 11470
Full Member
 

I strafe walkers with an Uzzi. None of them has ever suggested I get a bell retrospectively. It's the right thing to do. Because, er, I do it.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:46 pm
Posts: 426
Free Member
 

Where's BBJ gone?

I'd just pulled up a chair and got the packet of digestives out. ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

It's the right thing to do. Because, er, I do it.

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This remark and this remark alone makes you a retard

rubberneck - Member
FOG HORNS MAKE BIDDYS DIVE INTO BUSHES,,,,,, **** HIL-AIR-IOUS.

Clearly a bully boy attitude. AND the fact that you cannot see that just proves what a retard you are.
GROWN SICK OF BEING TOLD TO USE A BELL BY 'DAILY MAIL READING' BIDDYS
Remind me where on this site have i ever suggested that you/cyclist should use a bell? I cycle everywhere I haven't even got a car. I live 6 miles from the nearest shop and have a grand total of 2 buses a week.
PS for you information i have a cousin who has downs syndrome,,, PRICK
There is nothing more sicking that someone who use a family member like that.
PS I am afraid I have no idea what the Daily Mail reading bit is about. Are you saying that someone who reads the Daily mail is inferior. As I read the Times I cannot comment about the contents of the Daily Mail but love to know why you think there inferior.
You must tell me are all the members of your family retarded?
This was question by the way not an accusation.


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:54 pm
Posts: 426
Free Member
 

Excellent! True class. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 12/12/2010 7:58 pm
Page 3 / 5