Forum menu
Pace Rc31 forks
 

[Closed] Pace Rc31 forks

 aa
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2186564]

Has anyone had experience with them, I have the opportunity to get a pair but don't know the history of this particular pair, are they prone to the bonding coming unstuck, cracking etc or are they a safe bet?

Cheers guys


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:07 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

I found them flexy, very flexy.
But I was a tad too heavy for them. Sold on when I realised.
Found On-Ones smidgen heavier & lot stiffer.
You'll be amazed what can be ridden with them though.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:12 pm
 aa
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I found them flexy, very flexy.

Was this flexy sideways or fore/aft. It sounds like they give good damping.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:17 pm
Posts: 9
Full Member
 

I didn't find them flexy, but I weigh less than a gnat's fart. Ran them with disc brakes and V-brakes before that.

They felt great to ride, really precise, but were destroying my elbow after I broke it, so I swapped back to suspension.

They were so nice that I was about to sell them on, then found out that they no longer make them, and decided to keep them as I'll never be able to get a set of forks like them if I want them again.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:34 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

Flexy as in look down & see the blades flexing backwards under hard braking. ๐Ÿ˜›
(I was a over the top weight limit though).
Yes, good damping compared to a rigid steel fork.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I found them fine and I'm 16 stone. They're meant to bend. Can't say I found them significantly better than steel forks other than in weight and looks.


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 12:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mine unbonded at dropout and crown.


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 8:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm around 85kg and have no issues with mine.
Yes there is some flex but I believed that to be the intention

They absorb small shocks superbly on my 1x9 winter bike. (Trek ZR9000 frame). Very light too.

I have also a set of the On-one forks and I'd agree they flex less but I prefer the feel of the RC31's.


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 9:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The reason that they are percieved as more comfy is due solely to the flex. The 440mm ones (correct for 100mm travel bikes) flex quite a lot more than the 420mm ones. I run both on bikes with similar geometry.

The carbon in no percievable way compress's so they will only seem as comfy as a similary flexy steel fork. I always let a lttle air out on tyre when running them rather than my sus forks. No de-bonding issues with either of mine, nor have i seen it happan personally. Saying that they may well do, but don't listen to me anyway as Sheldona say's i know nothing about bikes and just talk out my arse ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 11:19 am
Posts: 2227
Free Member
 

I was fine on several pairs till I went down Kingston Ridge in Lewes and watched the for/arf movement. It worried me enough to get some cheaper heavier carbon forks. They never failed and I'm 13/14st and rode them SS.
Tim


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 11:23 am