Nobby Nics question...
 

[Closed] Nobby Nics question.

18 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
65 Views
Posts: 3535
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thinking about getting these for the autumn and winter (tubeless ones). Any thoughts on what size? The bulk of riding I do is the likes of Glentress, Pentlands, Highlands etc, and planning to do the Puffer again next January. Nothing extreme, just the normal Scottish mud, rocks, mud, roots and mud.

Bike is a Genesis Altitude hardtail.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 8:31 am
Posts: 6775
Full Member
 

2.1 rear
2.25 front


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 8:48 am
Posts: 3535
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Boxelder, that's pretty much the combination I'm thinking about.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 8:56 am
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

I'd avoid the 2.1's, especially on the rear of a HT - I find them quite 'fragile', although the Schwalbe Rep. I spoke to said they are exactly the same construction as the 2.25/2.4's - not sure if the same for the UST ones.

As for doing the Puffer etc, I'd run the NN's through the autumn and then put on a pair of Mud X's - which are tubeless ready - for muddy/snowy conditions.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 9:03 am
Posts: 6775
Full Member
 

UST ones are much tougher


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 9:21 am
Posts: 34504
Full Member
 

My UST NN wore out pretty fast on the back. (2.1)


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 9:22 am
Posts: 426
Free Member
 

I really like them for grip and weight, but running the normal ones tubeless with Stan's they do have weak sidewalls which cut up very easily. I haven't tried the UST or Snakeskin versions though.

I'm now moving to Maxxis.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wouldn't put a NN on the front of my bike when there is a chance of slightly damp roots/rocks, or maybe I would if I fancied removing my front teeth 😀

Saying that though, I wouldn't put one on the rear - too fragile IMO.

Joking aside, I lasted 1 ride with a 2.25 UST NN on the front of my HT.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 9:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a 2.25 UST NN on the front of my bike and I haven't had any problems at all on damp roots / rocks. It's a lot more grippy than I expected it to be. It was an absolute bugger to get on though!


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 10:22 am
Posts: 34504
Full Member
 

[i]Joking aside, I lasted 1 ride with a 2.25 UST NN on the front of my HT.[/i]

Too much pressure


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got 2.25 NN front on hardtail bike, seems to be ok on all terrain, even when muddy.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 10:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maybe my version was a harder compound? - 27psi too high, not sure about that one. Im a stickler for tyre pressure.

I dont think anyone who I ride with (around 20 different people) would ride with a NN. For the conditions around where I live you wouldnt last 2 mins on steep techy damp trails. The only ride I did with them on was a standard mid week club ride. Forest trails/moorland & damp steep rooty cheeky paths. Within 2 mins, going up hill I had slipped on a off camber root! Never had any issues before, tyres are very subjective to an individuals riding style - I just don't get on with NN.

If i was more into XC/fire road trails then i'm sure they would be great 😀


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 12:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I found them awesome. Squirmy, punctured all the time, made me lose all confidence in riding the bike, completely overrated. Yep, awesome.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 1:01 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[i]I dont think anyone who I ride with (around 20 different people) would ride with a NN. For the conditions around where I live you wouldnt last 2 mins on steep techy damp trails. The only ride I did with them on was a standard mid week club ride. Forest trails/moorland & damp steep rooty cheeky paths. Within 2 mins, going up hill I had slipped on a off camber root! Never had any issues before, tyres are very subjective to an individuals riding style - I just don't get on with NN.[/i]

What do you use instead then? There are quite a few rooty trails behind where I live, and not much fireroad (I'm glad to say).


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Been riding NN's for 18 months and love em! Got snakeskin 2.25's with slimes on my ss and double defense on my HT. Very grippy I find

Coped very well all last winter on the ss (1 punture) riding 3-4 times a week on rooty trails and since the DD's went on for the summer only had 2 punctures running normal tubes. ps. hate punctures!


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 3:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What do you use instead then?

Front tyre : Super tacky High rollers / DH compound Hutchinson Barracuda's / WTB Prowler MX all UST variants

Rear tyre : Usually stick to 60a compound High rollers or Ignitors but quite enjoyed having a 42a barracuda on the bigger bike for wet DH sections.

As for dry summer trails / spanish mountains, small block 8's or Larsen TT's are a good compromise for speed & grip but you need to feel confident with front wheel drifting.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Keep running a 2.1 on back and its a nightmare. They dont seem tough enough. Run them tubeless and the gave up and ran tubes. Constantly puncturing. Scott scale and struggling for space at rear- run a 2.25 on front and no issues, love it.


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 4:19 pm
Posts: 10487
Free Member
 

I've been running 2.25 front NN with a 2.1 rear RR all summer on my FS and love them, gonna put a 2.1 NN out back for winter. No problems on roots or rock for me


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[i]but you need to feel confident with front wheel drifting[/i]

That rules them out for me then (-:


 
Posted : 07/08/2010 5:07 pm