New cycle trail pro...
 

[Closed] New cycle trail proposals

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As anyone local will no-doubt already know a new cycle trail has been proposed in Plymouth. The problem is, the local ramblers are, as always, opposing (don't they have anything better to do in there time?!).

The main argument they're using against us is that we'll "go careering down the hill, putting others at risk". Well, it'll be a dedicated cycle trail, so they shouldn't be on it anyway.

Anyhow, if anyone has a minute to spare to sign the partition for it, that would be great.

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/plymouth-city-council-support-the-development-of-cycle-trails-in-the-plym-valley-2


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...go careering down the hill, putting others at risk...

That's almost word for word the argument against a path over Tennyson Down on the IoW.


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That's almost word for word the argument against a path over Tennyson Down on the IoW.

I'm not surprised, it's probably the best they can come up with.


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 3:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bump for the evening crowd.


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 8:01 pm
 lump
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Done


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 8:20 pm
Posts: 4986
Full Member
 

Done


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 9:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Re the nay sayers, organise a meeting with them, say you'd like to address their concerns, be prepared for the worst most pedantic small minded nay sayers so they can't surprise/disappoint you and patiently talk to them about how it will help separate thrill sealing behaviour, ease pressure on the PROW network, help boost the local economy and any other locally specific needs/issues, talk about clear signage etc... Will look good to the LA making any decisions if such action are taken, even if just as a 'listening exercise', and may even (don't count on it) help address their concerns (which may just be born from naivety and ignorance) and reassure them...

It has been known to happen...

anyway. petition done. good luck!


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for signing everyone, really appreciate it. It's going to be really good for the local area.

Re the nay sayers, organise a meeting with them, say you'd like to address their concerns, be prepared for the worst most pedantic small minded nay sayers so they can't surprise/disappoint you and patiently talk to them about how it will help separate thrill sealing behaviour, ease pressure on the PROW network, help boost the local economy and any other locally specific needs/issues, talk about clear signage etc... Will look good to the LA making any decisions if such action are taken, even if just as a 'listening exercise', and may even (don't count on it) help address their concerns (which may just be born from naivety and ignorance) and reassure them...

We have already had one meeting with them Friday gone, with all involved parties present. Not sure if another one is happening or not yet, but we're pulling the stops out to try and keep everyone happy. This is the third attempt to get permission for this now, twice they've forced us to re-plan a smaller track. Originally there was going to be a full cycle-centre, multiple skills areas and a much larger track. Shame it's been forced to get so much smaller as it would originally have benefitted them so much more as well. Ah well, at least this time it's looking somewhat more positive.


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Only 439 signatures - come on!!!!!


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 9:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Done


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 10:38 pm
Posts: 4332
Full Member
 

Done


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 66087
Full Member
 

Nimbyism's annoying but you can counter their argument pretty effectively with "Purpose built trails will reduce contention and risk as it will draw riders away from the shared-use trails". Shoots down their wonky argument, using their terms of engagement, and nicely rubs in "shared use" as well.

They'll still object but it'll be more obviously cobblers.


 
Posted : 03/12/2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Nimbyism's annoying but you can counter their argument pretty effectively with "Purpose built trails will reduce contention and risk as it will draw riders away from the shared-use trails". Shoots down their wonky argument, using their terms of engagement, and nicely rubs in "shared use" as well.

The exact argument that has been put foreword.

Thanks again for signing everyone.


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 11:00 am
Posts: 2367
Free Member
 

Done. Good luck.


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 11:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks again for signing everyone. The proposals went through the council today and we won! Permission has been granted and the plans will now be going ahead.

National Trust press release here: http://www.ntsouthwest.co.uk/2012/12/plym-valley-cycle-trail-given-approval/


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 10:41 pm