Forum menu
money no object.......
 

[Closed] money no object........the best hubs.

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Royce I have truly is a fantastic hub, wish I could afford one for each end of each of my bikes


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I really, really like the old shimano roller-clutch hubs. Ultimate stealth, instant take-up and I had one for 5 years on the singlespeed with not a single moments maintenance.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Phone Royce,talk to Cliff for a bit (he likes to talk!).
Then buy his hubs.
Pauls have I9 guts now....whizzy noise.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:41 pm
Posts: 1411
Full Member
 

value: XT / XTR's and hope.
all factors: BOR / Tune or 240 / 190s. All very good.

Kings are very nice, proprietary servicing tools need tho.
Woods are nice too.

I had a set of middleburn hubs from way back; they had grease ports on them, never had to break them down, they just ran and ran and ran - do they make hubs any more?

Lastly - Profile hubs. Indestructible.

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:48 pm
 P20
Posts: 4264
Full Member
 

I'd stick with my kings. I'd previously had Royce and unless they've improved in recent years, I'd stay clear. My set had poor bearing life and no adjustment. My mate had three hubshells crack, yes Royce changed them, but he had to pay for the service and the wheel rebuilds. The Royce do look and sound fabulous (think old campag) but they are too fragile IMO.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:25 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
 

Phil Wood makes a field serviceable hub which I like the sound of.

Somehow I broke a flange on a DT Swiss 440 hub, my Chris Kings, Hadley and Hope Pro 3s have been faultless.

But head and shoulders above them all are a set of Hope XC that have seen service through every winter since I got them in 2005.

I'd go with Hope and use the change you'd have spent on the bling for a flight somewhere to try and wear them out. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

D45yth. Yesterday with 2 king rear hubs. Both owned by very experienced riders who know how to service their kit. Both aknowledged that it may be worth getting some cheap nasty hubs as they are better in sub zero. So that answers your question i hope?


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:35 pm
Posts: 94
Full Member
 

I have some DT240's which are four years d and abused! Still run and run. Not flash looking but a great bit if kit.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:02 am
 wool
Posts: 21
Full Member
 

Phil Wood's easy to service and look fab but heavy, love my hope's but love my DT 240s as well,easy servicing and go forever. Hope Ti Glides from 2002 sill going strong just competed their 4th 3 Peaks.
Kings just look to much hassle to look after but never having owned a set cant comment on real world use.
Bearing change on the Phil Woods is just as easy as a Hope.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:12 am
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

Anyone used the White Ind Eno hubs...?
Any good ?

I have Surly SS hubs that just seem to go on & on.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:15 am
Posts: 8755
Full Member
 

Of the hubs I've actually used then it would be i9's for me, I've read the sealing isn't the best but mine haven't been serviced in the 18 months I've had them and still seem fine to me. Whatever the 'correct' answer is I think the rear needs 120 PoE minimum, anything less clearly isn't the best.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 9:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When the last time time you actually saw this happen?

Last winter? Only person I know with CK MTB hubs. They froze solid. Might be a problem as simple as CK's choice of lube rather than a hardware issue, but still amusing.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 10:14 am
Page 2 / 2