Is a hollowtech bot...
 

[Closed] Is a hollowtech bottom bracket a hollowtech bottom bracket..

21 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
72 Views
Posts: 793
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Need a new BB for the CX bike 68mm English thread with ultegra cranks. So is any hollowtech compatible (105/Ultegra Dura Ace) it just comes down to how much I wanna spend ?
Cheers


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:10 am
Posts: 6693
Full Member
 

I think so (Certainly my experience) but you can run in to trouble using none Shimano parts. I knackered a Deore bb trying to fit Race Face cranks.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:13 am
Posts: 10957
Free Member
 

Yes, CRC were knocking out cheap XTR ones a while back.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:14 am
Posts: 656
Free Member
 

Yes, and the only difference with the MTB ones is the centre spacer tube so if there's a particularly good deal on those, you can just reuse the one from your existing bb.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:14 am
Posts: 793
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Was thinking of getting a hope but price difference is quite a lot so gonna stick to Shimano.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:15 am
Posts: 10957
Free Member
 

XTR = £23.99 @ CRC


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:18 am
Posts: 24548
Free Member
 

I think so (Certainly my experience) but you can run in to trouble using none Shimano parts. I knackered a Deore bb trying to fit Race Face cranks.

Different spacing / tensioning system. You need a RF compatible BB for RF axles, GXP with GXP, etc.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:19 am
Posts: 793
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bollox, guess who has an un used XTR BB that came with some cranks but binned the spacer tube from removed BB !


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:23 am
Posts: 10957
Free Member
 

My XTR BB works fine on my RF Evolve cranks, should it not? Different method to preload bearings, but all else equal, no?


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:24 am
Posts: 24548
Free Member
 

I stand corrected. I was pretty sure there was a small difference in axle length so that one wouldn't tension the bearings properly, but RF themselves say it's OK (bit over half way down)

http://www.raceface.com/faq/

GXP not, I'll stand by that, they have a stepped axle or something.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:28 am
Posts: 10957
Free Member
 

It's not a "spacer" as such, is it? Just reduced shite and water ingress from seattube I think.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's not a "spacer" as such, is it? Just reduced shite and water ingress from seattube I think.

Yep, that's what it's for - if you've got a carbon bike with a completely sealed BB shell you don't need them - otherwise you do - the back side of the bearings will be sitting in a pool of mud/water otherwise.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not sure if there's a difference with the Shimano stuff but Chris King's road BB cup is slightly wider than the MTB version.

Edit : It might be the other way - MTB wider than road but there's certainly a difference in the King stuff.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:34 am
Posts: 793
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just got an Ultegra one at wiggle £11.00. Must keep plastic tube thingy 🙂


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 8:43 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

carbonfiend, I've got an XT centre tube that should fit the XTR shells no issue if you want it for the cost of postage, or I could buy your XTR BB off you? 😉


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 9:21 am
Posts: 793
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You can have the XTR of me if u want as the only other hollowtech bike I have has a Hope in it which I just replace bearings when needed. Let me dig it out & send u a mail.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 2:29 pm
Posts: 3315
Full Member
 

shimano and other similarly priced BB's will be fine, though as above, the sleeve may need binned. as long as you have one spacer non drive side and two drive side for a 68mm bB you'll be fine.

oh and the BB isn't hollowtech, the crankarms are. the original Shimano hollowtech cranks ran on octalink BB's. Hollowtech II cranks have an integrated axle and run with external type BB's (for threaded BB shells).


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

paule - Member
Yes, and the only difference with the MTB ones is the centre spacer tube so if there's a particularly good deal on those, you can just reuse the one from your existing bb.

Nope, cups are slightly wider on the road ones 2.5mm wider iirc) so you could run into spacing issues


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 4:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The actual visible cup should be the same width but the threaded part is longer on a MTB BB.

Shouldnt cause any problems tho


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 9:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope, the visible cup is wider also. Trust me, caused me all kind of confusion when I first shoved an MTB one into the road bike


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 10:22 pm
Posts: 17187
Full Member
 

Regardless of longevity is the xtr much better than xt?


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 10:45 pm
Posts: 2339
Full Member
 

Shimano Road BB cups are 1mm wider than MTB, normally on 68mm road frame they are used without spacers, you can use MTB cups but I'd put 1mm either side. Note MTB BB also comes with a wider tube between cups which you can't use on a road frame without deforming it (or using all the spacers) they are generally meant for 73mm BBs.

The XT BB has a bigger bearing than the Deore BB, and seem better sealed. I went through a pile of Deore BBs before I started using XT. An XT BB is only £10 on CRC (cheaper than the Deore!) so I haven't tried the XTR as XT works for me.

The thread on a Mountain BB is longer on the drive side in case you are using a BB mounted derailleur. The Saint BB has an even longer thread for BB mounted chain device. The Saint BB looks otherwise idential to the XT.

GXP uses a stepped crank (24mm/22mm) I've tried using shims on a Shimano BB (24mm) but had problems with chainring offset and eventually binned the GXP crank. GXP BBs don't seem to last either, and are limited in choice, which was the main reason I changed to Shimano.


 
Posted : 14/08/2015 10:45 pm