Fitness testing, th...
 

[Closed] Fitness testing, the numbers for those of a scientific nature

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So as part of my training plan today was marked in for fitness testing, or sweating like a pig on cycle machine whilst someone stuck needles in me.

I decided that I'd like to know my baseline fitness levels partly to confirm which heart rate zones I should be training in, and partly so I can conduct the test again in a few months and know for sure if my training plan is working.

And the cunning bit is that I can claim the cost of the test back against my yearly "sports" allowance from my company.

Anyway I cycled away happily at 80 watts and every 180 seconds the machine increased the load by 40 watts, and after 23 odd minutes I died a death and gave up.

Amongst the many things I found out was the following, my aerobic threshold is 162bpm at 250 watts or more interestingly 3.35 watts/kg of body weight. Somewhat off from the 5.8 to 6.2 range of Tour riders. With a peak at 350 watts and a max pulse of 179.

I now need to adjust my training zones as before I was using 174 as my max pulse.

Train hard and according to plan and wait 3 months and test again.

To be continued....


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 7:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

a max pulse of 179.

I now need to adjust my training zones as before I was using 174 as my max pulse.

Sarcasm?


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 7:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Actually in all seriousness although I can see how easy it would be to think the opposite ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:04 pm
Posts: 4338
Free Member
 

Very similar to mine i had done in december

[img] [/img]

I came out at 3.32 watts per kg. Was 75kg then.. now 73

So did they say what your base fitness was like?

EDIT: Oops.. Sorry it was 3.2watts per kg

My 3.2 watts/kg figure is based on functional threshold which is less than actual threshold


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:05 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

179 vs 174, how much does that shift your training zones by exactly?


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

179 vs 174, how much does that shift your training zones by exactly?

Quite a bit as it turns out ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
Max 174 179
95% 165 170
91% 158 163
84% 146 150
82% 143 147
75% 131 134
72% 125 129
65% 113 116


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where did you get it done and how much was it?


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I live in Sweden so maybe not that much use to you, but quite a few places in the UK provide the same service. I paid just under a hundred quid for that test, and some other blood tests. Overall it took 90 minutes including consultation time.

Well worth it in my books.


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hmmm maybe i can ask the sports science bods if they want a guinea pig then see how 3 months of tri (not) training affects my figures


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:28 pm
Posts: 4338
Free Member
 

I got mine done in Bristol

http://www.truezone.co.uk/Home.html


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:29 pm
Posts: 4338
Free Member
 

What came out of mine is I need my percentage of energy from fat at aerobic base point to be bigger and to increase my functional threshold power to over 4 watts per kg


 
Posted : 10/02/2011 8:32 pm