Forum menu
Fat bikes & the...
 

[Closed] Fat bikes & the future?

Posts: 21016
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#6047044]

Couple of questions, from an interested spectator:

1. Is their a proper standard for everything?
Wheel diameter, dishing & width, hub & BB spacing etc.

2. Are the big boys showing any signs of disrupting or altering the current accepted format?

I keep bikes for a loooong time and can't afford to get stitched up with a Betamax bike.

Common sense is telling me to hold on and see if the major manufacturers drop a turd in the pool re compatability when they enter the market properly.
But you're a long time dead, there's room in the garage and....well, you know..... ๐Ÿ˜€

All the fault of John Climber and his fatty at Hit The North a few years ago btw. ๐Ÿ™‚

Thoughts?


 
Posted : 18/03/2014 9:47 pm
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

Don't let John give you a go on his Jones, now THAT could get expensive


 
Posted : 18/03/2014 10:40 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

I agree about the whole compatibility thing.

It's a fairly safe bet that 135 offset frames will be around for quite a while as that's currently the only way of fitting an Alfine or Rohloff (the latter have said that the potential market is too small - though they could change their minds).

170 is the next jump up and, although currently popular, seems to me to be a bit of a dead end. After all, if you're going that wide, why not jump to 186/190 and give yourself the option of the wider, 5" rubber?

Wheel dishing is all a function of the above.

Rim/tyre width is very much dependent on what type of riding you want to do - e.g. no need for 100mm if you're not on soft sand or snow.

BB widths seemed to have settled at 100mm, though there are a couple of proprietary solutions popping up.

The "big boys" (Spesh/Trek) don't currently seem to be driving a change of standards.

Remember the "half fat" solutions too. With Krampus-type 29+ already available and 27.5+ on the near horizon. I can see a lot of scope for the latter if they can be fitted into 29er frames.


 
Posted : 18/03/2014 10:49 pm
Posts: 953
Full Member
 

Not quite settled down yet, until companies stop making wider rims and tyres then hub and bb widths won't settle down. I can see two sizes existing, bikes designed for 4" tyres and bikes designed for 5" tyres, the smaller size mire trail orientated and the bigger size for proper sand/snow stiff.


 
Posted : 18/03/2014 10:54 pm