Ever..Spent more on...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Ever..Spent more on a component than the frame?

32 Posts
30 Users
0 Reactions
65 Views
Posts: 14666
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[suppose with carbon wheels it might happen a lot..]

Considering a £300 frame and £450 fork (both new), the next frame 'up' option are £700/800 & cheaper forks are seemingly pretty rubbish (29er's)...


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 4:40 pm
Posts: 3846
Full Member
 

Yep lots of my bikes. Forks are expensive these days!


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:05 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

My forks are almost certainly worth more than my frame.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:06 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

My steel 456 ran full XTR drivetrain, decent fork and Hope Hoops; so, yes.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, my Cranks on my Pace cost more than the frame, as did the forks. If you like the frame, donw worry about it.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:09 pm
Posts: 7337
Free Member
 

My frame cost £90 NOS in 2004. So I guess that the answer is yes. Several times. 8)


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:12 pm
 sbob
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The price label on my old Magura rim brakes was £185, going onto a £350 GT Tequesta, so I'm guessing they were more than the frame value.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:16 pm
Posts: 66003
Full Member
 

Sure. Not my current 2 frames mind but often in the past. You don't need to spend a lot to get a good frame after all but other components tend to need a little investment.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:21 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7207
Full Member
 

Yep in the past, as stated above forks are bloody expensive now days.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:24 pm
Posts: 14666
Free Member
Topic starter
 

posted this, walked away then thought "on one & forks".. realised my post was a little redundant...

Well at least I won't be being completely daft...


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:33 pm
Posts: 14820
Full Member
 

My seat post cost more than my frame


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:42 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7207
Full Member
 

I had some £600 Fox forks on a 456 🙂


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I got an end of line frame for 150 quid so pretty much everything on the bike costs more than the frame did!


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:50 pm
 hh45
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fox forks and nice Hope / Crest wheelset on a Soul frame. And the pair of Juicy 7s is close to £470 I recall.

My seat post cost more than my frame
That's good going!


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As my c456 only cost £300 it's quite easy I suppose. I think the forks were £350 but should have been £600.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have Turbine cranks on my Inbred.
And 2nd hand Wotans cost me the same as my new BFe frame.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 6:01 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12597
Free Member
 

Just buy the Whyte mate...

A MILLION times better than an On One...

But yes, have spent more on forks before than the frame, a few times.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bought a Genesis SS for £200 (second hand) then spent the same on Exposure Race and Red-Eye lights to go on it!!


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 6:23 pm
Posts: 32603
Full Member
 

I commute to work on a Kona Dew Hybrid with the same rrp as the Exposure Maxx I use to find my way along the unlit towpaths/sustrans routes on the commute


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 7:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Come to think of it, I totalled up the spend on a bike build... came to about 2k of which 150 quid was the frame!


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 7:13 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Easy to do with Fox or DT forks.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 8:50 pm
Posts: 43
Full Member
 

£1069 Rohloff hub on a £399 Pipedream Sirius frame. Brakes cost more than the frame, too, as did the fork...


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not really, but forks are now worth the same as the frame, groupset cost more than the frame though.


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 11:20 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

The rear hub on my fixie cost more than the frame and forks combined (all bought new)


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 11:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My TRP magnesium canti's cost more than my frame & my Stans/goldtec wheels


 
Posted : 01/12/2012 11:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2003 Rockhopper comp with M785 Groupset and pro II/717's/revolutions...

So yes 🙂 But remedied that by buying as soul! Now all is as it should be 😛


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 7:02 am
 P20
Posts: 4183
Full Member
 

King wheels on a steel 456


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 7:37 am
Posts: 479
Full Member
 

Yes, I own a 456


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 7:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Second hand Mmmbop... many components cost more.


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 2:03 pm
Posts: 41701
Free Member
 

Just about everything on my old 456 cost more than the £99 frame.

My road bike cost me £300 s/h, the wheels (inc tyres and cassette) are now about £450rrp.

Hard to say really, I chop and change a lot of kit so most stuff is 2nd hand, but forks probably exceed the frames on most builds at rrp.


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 2:26 pm
Posts: 941
Free Member
 

Yep forks @ v nearly thrice the price of frame ! then brakes and again wheels basically my frame was only 10% cost of my build..


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think frames are incredibly cheap really - on my BFe the frame is about 15% of the build cost - coil forks were circa £500 vs frame £300, Covert frame was about 20% vs what the build would have cost with new components


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup done it twice, first was a set of Mazz forks on an Orange Crush, and latest Stanton slackline £400, Fox float 36's £880


 
Posted : 02/12/2012 8:33 pm