Effective Top Tube ...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Effective Top Tube / Stem Combo - What is your ideal for general trail riding?

7 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
48 Views
Posts: 3993
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As a follow-on conversation post-group ride in the pub last night, I'm interested in what combo Singletrackers are currently running / preferring.

The general 'wisdom' seems to be that people are moving away from small frame / long stem to longer frame / shorter stem for trail center stuff but I'm really surprised how many XC pootlers are running 50mm stems and wide bars.


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 8:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

top tube?

it's all about 'reach' now, Grandad.

for me, 460mm reach + 35mm stem seems to work well for general XXXc trail mincing.

(i'm 6'1"ish, but wit a short torso)


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 8:52 am
Posts: 3380
Full Member
 

Main bike currently has a 24" top tube and I've just changed from a 50mm to a 40mm stem. Feels good, I can move my weight around the bike a little bit easier and the change to steering feel is great. I do wonder what the downside is as I look at the frames designed to run 35mm stems and in my size the top tubes are 25"+.


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 9:40 am
Posts: 10487
Free Member
 

29'er FS XC bike has a flipped 90mm stem & 720mm wide bars.

29'er HT XC bike has a flipped 90mm stem and 700mm wide bars.

29'er rigid steel has 80mm stem and 730mm wide bars.

All with around a 600mm horizontal top tube too, they've all got layback posts on them as well

I'm 5'11" btw


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 9:53 am
Posts: 41675
Free Member
 

620mm top tube, 120mm stem, 680mm bars.

Fashion be damned.

6ft and "enduro specific BMI".


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

6ft 1.

150mm stump evo
45mm stem
780mm bars
617mm effective top tube
442mm reach.

Feels spot on for me and for what i enjoy.


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not massively into measurements but I'm 5'10", ride 16-17" bikes with 22.5" top tube and ~90mm stems (currently a small Alpine 160). On 710mm bars but finding myself right on the ends so might go wider.

I grew up riding when 120-130mm stems were the norm and the Raceface DH stem I once bought was 85mm, so anything less than ~90mm feels twitchy to me, fashion and theory be damned. I dont change stem length for riding type either, same set up whether chilterns or alps.


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 11:06 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

Reach is often claimed to be the be-all-end-all dimension to help sizing, but staring at it too hard can be the wrong thing to do:-

For example:-
1) Adding 10mm to headtube length, with a slack head angled bike shortens reach by 4mm (for the same front centre).

2) A hardtail at ride height will have an effective reach that's perhaps nearly 20mm longer than it is statically.


 
Posted : 14/07/2014 11:17 am