Darkside - Triple o...
 

[Closed] Darkside - Triple or Compact - opening a can of worms!

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]No way!Never seen a fit roadie push-ever![/i]

There were a few pushing up the Talla climb on the Radar Ride and quite a few more pushing up the Bealach na ba on the Bealach Mor.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 5:48 pm
Posts: 39668
Free Member
 

No way!Never seen a fit roadie push-ever!

There were a few pushing up the Talla climb on the Radar Ride and quite a few more pushing up the Bealach na ba on the Bealach Mor.

he said fit ... there is no excuse for pushing up bealach its a speedbump for a fit cyclist- its just long


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]its a speedbump for a fit cyclist-[/i]

Thats a load of bollox, its hardly an easy climb. Of the two Talla is much easier.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 5:58 pm
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both are a piece of piss.

To the OP - you can get 29T cassettes, I have one on my bike and use it with a compact. Gives me a nice spread of gears and lets me keep spinning.

Just use what you want to use and stop giving a **** what other people think.

There is an expert level mtb xc punter not too far from here uses a triple and he can very easily wipe the floor with me...


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Both are a piece of piss.[/i]

Yeh but you're a riding god smee.

And there were also lots of people walking up the final climb on the radar ride.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:02 pm
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are also lots of people that do sportives who you would hardly classify as fit though.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the scenes of fit roadies off and walking has more to do with nutrition and pacing than the size of their chainsets. Ive passed riders way better than me that have blown up after being too aggresive too early and hitting the wall, when your that far gone even the best can get caught out.
I'd recommend people get what suits them and not worry about fashion
( though having said that, I have not now, nor have ever had, anything less than a double 53/39 on any of my roadbikes, and if you suggest other, I'll see you in court!!) ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:37 pm
Posts: 26870
Full Member
 

Before my hip injury woes my roadbike had a triple on it 26/36/48 not sure what cassette was 12-25 I think. Anyway I hardly used the inner ring but it did get used on steep climbs when I'd completely blown every once in a while. This set up was fine for everything from 3min hill climbs to 10 mile TT's in 24 1/2mins to the long route of the Gran Fondo Cymru and 200 mile audax. Cant see the point in 52 chainrings so a triple is fine or if you are a wanabe roadie ponce get a compact.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 6:53 pm
Posts: 39668
Free Member
 

bealach is a piece of pisss ... i read all this bollox about it being hard , then sat in the pub in the loch carron saw mike cottys repo of it , hes a chap whos opinion i respect and he said it was easy ass far as tough climbs go - rode it the next day and thought my that was a let down .... mike was right ... its NOT steep ... its just long.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Ive passed riders way better than me that have blown up after being too aggresive too early and hitting the wall, when your that far gone even the best can get caught out.[/i]

Yeh I know someone that happened too, can't remember the name though ๐Ÿ˜‰

So the 2 mile section in the middle of the Bealach, isn't steeo. Yeh right, I suppose it isn't for willy waving heroes.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 8:56 pm
Posts: 39668
Free Member
 

maybe from the apple cross side itd be steeper ....even the missus found it a pleasent enough climb......n she was craping her self about it .


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 9:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm sure all the willy wavers reckon they're far fitter and faster than me, but I've walked up a climb. I wasn't fit for me at the time, but still far from unfit - had been in the top 20% of finishers at a sportive shortly before. Was a fairly sustained 1:5 after 50 miles or so and I just didn't have low enough gears.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 11:14 pm
 rhys
Posts: 63
Free Member
 

I have triple on my commuter (with panniers) and on my Carbon race bike. When racing the limit screw is adjusted so only 2 are useable but when I goto the Alps all three there and used. Not that many beat me on hills as I spin up. Have ridden most of the big tour climbs over the past 15 years. Overtaken twice and actually able o enjoy the experience. I could not ride up on a double. Triple all the way.


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 11:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mike WW
They were definately pushing up Bwlch y Groes (the one they tested spitfires on) and a couple did say that they wanted my triple!


 
Posted : 07/01/2010 11:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


Gilly C - Member

Mike WW
They were definately pushing up Bwlch y Groes (the one they tested spitfires on) and a couple did say that they wanted my triple!


Don't doubt there were people walking. My point was that they couldn't have been fit roadies. I thought I was reasonably fit until I started riding with some proper roadies and was/still am humbled.
But anyway, I think some people are getting confused between what they think is willy waving and honest experience.
I honestly don't care what people ride or how slow or fast they might be. Its simply that a 34/25(27) ratio gets you up anything I and many others have come across.Want more or touring with panniers or you want to spin get a triple really doesn't make any odds
Although I've mountain biked for a couple of years I've only ridden road bikes for 6 months and raced cyclocross for less. In reality the proper race orientated roadies I ride/train with don't give a stuff about what you wear/what you ride and to a fair extent even how quick you are.I think its easy to confuse these people with all the gear no idea posers perhaps?


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 12:29 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

If you want I can ask an aquaintance of mine (who is a team pro rider) what he thinks of the question?


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 12:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

juan did you used to be in SUMBC?? I know rich farley and tim etc was president year before Rich.

ANy advice greatly recieved!


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 1:12 am
Posts: 39668
Free Member
 

aracer - im pro triple despite the above. as you state doesnt matter how fit you are ... if your pace is wrong and/or the ride is a long un you will benefit from it ...

all im stating is that bealach isnt as hard(and no i didnt use my triple ..39:23) as the reputation it seems to have gained - there are much harder climbs to ride


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 7:58 am
Posts: 8
Full Member
 

[i]its nice to be able to ride up a 25% after 200k with some tough climbs in with 100k and further climbs still to go.[/i]

Of course it is. That's what 39x25 is for. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 9:59 am
Posts: 26870
Full Member
 

Any climb is hard if you've ridden over 150miles, this question can only be answered by getting to the root of the problem, how far do you expect to ride. Do you expect to keep riding when you have hit the grovel mode, if you dont then a double will be fine.


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 11:18 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Andy yes I was in the SUMBC in the golden age of rich tim andy and simon.
Speaking to the lbs they are pro triple all the way (but then I live somewhere where road are all steep) in my opinion I think it's better to have the granny option. Even if you dont use it you'll have it for this moment (you know the one you're going to suffer when you'll be over 3500 m of climb and your leg will be heavy and hard to spin).

If I were you I'll go for a triple with a 27. But then I am very pragmatic.


 
Posted : 08/01/2010 7:04 pm
Page 2 / 2