Chinese carbon fram...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Chinese carbon frames....

201 Posts
58 Users
0 Reactions
396 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My take on it is that sometimes it might actually be the same. Sometimes it might look the same but not actually be the same. Sometimes that difference might actually matter, sometimes it might not. You just don't know.

You could always buy 4 of the 200 quid frames and then test 3 of them to destruction, just to satisfy your curiosity regarding quality, and still be 200 quid better off. 😀


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 10:54 am
Posts: 3403
Free Member
 

I see what you did there. Perhaps I should've said 'corking' 🙂


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:08 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

some of them do, like I offered njee he wants to come and see how he's more than welcome

So I assume you're laying up frames for one of the major manufacturers? Which one, if I may ask? Not Scott, because you sure as hell don't know how they're put together!


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Bottom line though - they do just the same job (unless you're the sort o sucker who cares about perceived quality/image/status etc.)

If you're going to be like that about it we should all be riding Apollos. They do do the same job too.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CBAsed.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:23 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They do do the same job too.

Great argument. AAA+. Go to the top of the class.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:28 am
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Spesh taking a stake in Merida is pretty much a textbook example of outsourcing.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee Its not a personal attack its an offer to expand your knowledge, I assumed you knew peter


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 11:53 am
Posts: 9386
Free Member
 

Who cares about the carbon quality, at £180 buy an on-one cr-mo frame, at least you know it's solid and has been designed by a rider that knows how a bike should ride.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 12:21 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

There's more threads about failed On One's than Chinese carbon frames...


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 12:23 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[sycophant]

Who cares about the carbon quality, at £180 buy an on-one cr-mo frame, at least you know it's solid and has been designed by a rider that knows how a bike should ride
[/sycophant]


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thanks.

I'd still like someone to convince me either way as I am looking for a new road frame.

Caad 10 is meant to be good


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 12:49 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

There's more threads about failed On One's than Chinese carbon frames...

Is there? Can you post a link to a failed carbon On One?
Genuine interest, honest! 🙂


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 1:24 pm
Posts: 8705
Full Member
 

Woohoo my carbon whippet frame just arrived from on-one...oh sorry, wrong thread 🙂


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry to go back to those Chinarellos but they offer 2 years warranty thats the same as Pinarello if you don't register within 10 days of purchase extra 12 months if you do, though I don't know how good Chinarellos warranties are.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

🙄 Daily Deal tomorrow? 🙄


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

According to [url= http://italiancyclingjournal.blogspot.com/2011/03/beware-of-fake-pinarello-bikes.html ]this[/url] Pinarello use Toray carbon and according to that Chinarello advert they also use Toray carbon so is the advert lying or is Pinarello trying to put people off them?

Daily deal?


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

brant - Member
Daily Deal tomorrow?

Never mind all this carbon stuff on Daily Deal - get some 29er tyres on

😀


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 4:44 pm
Posts: 76
Free Member
 

Tron - other way round. Merida own part of spesh.

A guy at work has a chinarello. I would say its extremely well made/ finished. Unless you were a seasoned bike geek you can't tell its a fake. I would quite happily buy/ ride one.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 5:38 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

njee Its not a personal attack its an offer to expand your knowledge, I assumed you knew peter

Peter? WTF? I've not taken it as a personal attack in the least, dont worry. We're all still waiting for you to give any evidence whatsoever that you know what you're talking about. Everything you've said suggests you have no clue. And repeatedly saying 'I know more than most' just makes you sound like a bit of a tool!


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't klnow if the OP has the desire to buy carbon after reading all this or even the will to ride a bike ever again, but....
[url= http://on-one.co.uk/i/q/FROOCAR456ND/on-one-carbon-456-un-decalled-frame ]http://on-one.co.uk/i/q/FROOCAR456ND/on-one-carbon-456-un-decalled-frame[/url].
In case it hasn't been seen.


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A thing of beauty, behold the sexyness 😛


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unless you were a seasoned bike geek you can't tell its a fake

How do you tell if you are a seasoned bike geek?


 
Posted : 06/09/2011 6:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

'don simon - Member
I don't klnow if the OP has the desire to buy carbon after reading all this or even the will to ride a bike ever again, but....'

Yes seen this... and after all the chatter I have decided to not buy a carbon frame.... however £299 is really good, but I will need new forks.. 120mm rebas might just do... no I must not the budget was £200.. oh bugger...

No really! I gave up a while back and ordered some slx brakes from rose bikes - £120. My LBS offered a cracking deal on some hopes but still just outside the budget 😥

So, anyway, I am getting the thing that was second on my wishlist of new stuff, and at a knockdown price that means mrs cider is still very happy! Bonus!

Going to the quantocks the end of next week, and Sharki is showing us round - new brakes will be used to slow my mass....

😆


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 12:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why would anyone wan't a carbon frame for off road use anyway! If I want carbon when I'm on the trail I would pack my fishing rods.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 2:04 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

£299 for a carbon 456? I'd love to try one


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 7:30 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Is there? Can you post a link to a failed carbon On One?
Genuine interest, honest!

Sorry PP, I meant steel ones, the comment was made that instead of buying a cheap carbon frame you should just buy an uber-reliable cro-mo On-One. Not seen any failed carbon On-Ones, nor Chinese MTBs. It was tongue in cheek though, as the volume of O-Os being ridden on here is a fair bit higher than Chinese carbon frames, but even so, like I said the only failure I could find was someone using one as a jump bike to see how it lasted, and breaking it after a couple of years.

Why would anyone wan't a carbon frame for off road use anyway!

Why wouldn't you "wan't" one (grammar fail)? Genuinely. Why would you dismiss so stridently a material that is used for 90% of top end bikes these days?


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 8:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good analysis here


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[s]Good analysis[/s] Paranoia here


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes seen this... and after all the chatter I have decided to not buy a carbon frame.

Don't let this thread put you off buying carbon in the future. I love my Orbea even though it sounds strange as the water bounces off the plastic when washing or the rocks ping off it when riding.
I have no fear of breakages and the frame has a lifetime warranty anyway.
Enjoy your purchases.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 9:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee I don't want one because they snap a lot and have a habit of turning into splints when you fall off and the frame bangs a rock and the like. I'm also so sorry for failing on my grammar! I bow my head in shame to your sanctimonious pearly arse. Also I cant fit a rack on a carbon frame so its just not practical for me. I would not have one for free so the Chinese frames would be expensive at 100 quid!

You could say that alloy or steel frames fail but in comparison to carbon I would like to know the ratio of carbon MTB frames sold? I would bet there is a stupid bias towards alloy and steel frames sold, so saying a carbon frame is just the same as the other materials is not really an argument for me.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 12:41 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

njee I don't want one because they snap a lot and have a habit of turning into splints when you fall off and the frame bangs a rock and the like. I'm also so sorry for failing on my grammar! I bow my head in shame to your sanctimonious pearly arse.

Not sure about pearly? Sanctimonious arse is perfectly valid though!

The other points are just a bit daft though! All frames snap, whether you fall off/have a rock strike or whatever. Just avoid commercial aircraft too from now on eh! Still, each to their own!


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 12:47 pm
Posts: 15978
Free Member
 

Its just progress innit. Few years back on here Aluminium frames were subject to the same debate of how they snapped so much easier than steal and the only thing that didnt snap was titanium.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bit stupid to compare an F1 car or a 300 million dollar aircraft to most carbon MTB frames IMO. I think that is where you score a big fail. Also I would have a guess that a commercial aircraft is slightly more tested than most carbon MTB frames! Yes all frames fail but I hear about just as many if not more carbon MTB and 'road' frames failing in the real world as I do about steel and alloy frames. I would say there is a stupid bias in alloy and steel frame sales compared to carbon too! So would you care to elaborate on that with your godly knowledge on these matters?

There must be hundreds more alloy frames sold compared to one carbon frame and there is definitely no more reports of those snapping and nasty things happening. Also carbon does get trashed more in a crash and that's a fact. I see people with bad nerves after a carbon bike crash. People riding alloy and steel frames don't seem to be in such a panic after the same light crashes.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 12:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There must be hundreds more alloy frames sold compared to one carbon frame

Maybe - but most of those are Halfords specials which aren't ridden hard. I'd suggest that in terms of road bike frames in a typical 3/4 race (let alone anything higher) the proportion is very much the other way round, and there's certainly a very significant proportion of carbon frames in use by MTB enthusiasts (ie those posting on here).

Anyway, where do you hear about carbon frame failures? From other paranoid sceptics who like to pass on any report of carbon frame failure (but ignore the metal ones)? From reports of crashes in bike races? I'm convinced there's significant over reporting of carbon failure compared to metal - there's certainly not the data to suggest that carbon frames fail more than metal ones.

Also carbon does get trashed more in a crash and that's a fact

No that's a fail - given a crash which does the sort of damage to a carbon frame you'd like to report, a metal one would also be written off.

People riding alloy and steel frames don't seem to be in such a panic after the same light crashes

That's kind of surprising given that the paranoid seem to be the ones on metal. Where do you get that data point from?


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 1:23 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]I don't want one because they snap a lot[/i]

I think you'll find that even the ones that do break tend to only do so once.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 1:28 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Aracer's last post +1!


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

I see people with bad nerves after a carbon bike crash. People riding alloy and steel frames don't seem to be in such a panic after the same light crashes.

If you had data to back this up I would also like to see the severity of the crash included in the data.

An aluminium frame cracking due to fatigue or from a minor crash at lowish speed compared to a carbon frame being in a high speed crash and being written off are completely different. Any frame can fail in a big way as there is not really any redundancy in the structure and when they do the results are nasty.

Carbon frames do not come on cheap bikes and are normally subjected to the extremes of the sport - be it a road cyclist or an off-road cyclist. As such there use is skewed so comparison is impossible unless you directly compare like to like - eg a 1kg XC race frame made out of aluminium, steel (yeah right!) and carbon.

Another thing people seem to be skating around is if you want a frame that is stiff enough to be efficient but also light and absorb vibrations then you don't really have any other choice. Again, the people who really don't know much about composites don't understand how much can be done with them to tailor behaviour such as stiffness, strength, impact resistance etc etc.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 1:50 pm
Posts: 7914
Free Member
 

Aracer +2

seth -1

also I'd much prefer to ride a repaired carbon frame than a repaired aluminium one.


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 3384
Free Member
 

Spesh taking a stake in Merida is pretty much a textbook example of outsourcing

Last time I paid attention to the Taiwan business news Merida had bought 49% of specalized... however this was back in about 2003 (or roughly whenever the Spec Epic was launched).


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 2:44 pm
Posts: 41688
Free Member
 

I think that is where you score a big fail. Also I would have a guess that a commercial aircraft is slightly more tested than most carbon MTB frames!

Actualy, its probably the other way arround..........

The aircraft will undergo a lot of FEA etc and individual components may be tested to validate the FEA modeling. But a prototype airliner is invaluable, dont't think you'd get to actualy break it.

Whereas bike manufacturers will hapllily leave a frame on the test rig untill it fails as it's only cost them a few hundred, or maybe thousands of, dollars. On-one even showed how many cycles beyond the CEN tests the carbon forks lasted IIRC?

I see people with bad nerves after a carbon bike crash. People riding alloy and steel frames don't seem to be in such a panic after the same light crashes.

So you admit, it's a paranoia, not a fact?


 
Posted : 07/09/2011 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.hongfu-bikes.com/html_products/29ER-FULL-SUSPENSION-263.html ]Oh no! These guys are now making unbranded carbon 29er duelly's.[/url]

Must admit they look great! But I'm a non believer.


 
Posted : 13/09/2011 4:57 pm
Page 3 / 3