can I use these for...
 

[Closed] can I use these forks if...

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I have a frame designed for 100 mm forks. My nearest and dearest has pinched my 100 mm manitou R7s leaving me with no forks for this frame. I happen to have a pair of revelations (120-140mm). If I leave enough sag can I use these or maybe restrict the movement oe... Any thoughts?


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You will die.....maybe


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 9:10 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

They would be fine at 120mm. 140mm would probably make the steering a bit slow/sluggish.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 9:35 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Should be OK - try it.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

~ 4% more leverage (at 120mm).

Would you ride the 100mm fork if you were 4% fatter?
I should hope not. You'll die ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 9:47 pm
Posts: 11543
Full Member
 

How old is the frame? I have a Pace RC-200 F8 - designed for 90mm travel, but works with 100mm - was going to stick a 120mm set on and thought I'd check so called to ask.

Was told best not to as the frame wasn't designed for that travel and the extra 20mm would add a bit more stress to the frame which again, it wasn't intended for. They didn't say the head tube would come away but they said it did increase the risk a bit.

Up to you, I decided against it s the Pace has sentimental value to me and I figured I'd be utterly gutted if the headtube ever did part company with the rest of the bike!


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 9:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a set of R7's that I no longer need. They have a poplock too, if you are interested drop me an email jmurph51@hotmail.com I'm not after much for them.

I would still be using them but the fork column is too short for my replacement frame.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 10:02 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Of course you'll be fine! If someone gave you the very same frame with 130mm forks and told you it's designed for 130mm you wouldn't notice any difference I bet!


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'll try it. If I die speak fondly of me and sing songs around camp fires telling of my demise. Thank you for the tempting offer of the manitous but if I buy any more forks I will be banished. I'll let you know how it goes.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 11:16 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

This old chestnut...

...an increase in axle to crown height is surely more important than the actual suspension travel, no? Of course, not all forks of similar travel have the same axle to crown height so you'll get small variations across the board.

I'd wind 'em down to 120mm and forget about it.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 11:49 pm
Posts: 12334
Full Member
 

I have a Pace RC-200 F8

I just did a wee; childhood dream bike.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 11:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have an old Handsome Dog XC01 HT; swapped 100mm fork for a 125mm Vanilla I rebuilt; brilliant. Go for it!


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 1:58 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

PJM1974 - Member
This old chestnut...

Indeed - given the max stress comes when the fork is compressed, the travel of the fork doesn't matter. The point is people who ride longer forks tend to ride harder/heavier on them, making a frame breakage more likely.

Brant has accepted this here, so it's FATC.


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you should be fine in the 120mm setting. the steering will become more wallowy in the 140mm setting and you'll find that your weight is over the rear wheel more.
my hardtail frame was designed for a 120mm fork but i've been running a 150mm fork on it for over 5 years without any problems.


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 10:24 am