29er gearing -how m...
 

[Closed] 29er gearing -how much am I going to loose at the bottom end?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm sure I could work it out but I'm equally sure someone already has...
Before I do anything rash and start looking at any 29ers for my XC bike, it strikes me that I'd be loosing quite a bit of gearing at the lower end.
I currently use a 22t granny and 11-36 cassette and do use the whole block.
The equivalent of how many gears would I loose from the low end by going from 26" to 29"?
I'll then see if I can live without the bottom "n" gears for a bit before I get my creditcard out.
Ta


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

29ers work out about 10% higher geared than a 26"


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 12:40 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

The 36t would feel like a 32, or the 22t woudl feel like a 24t on the front or thereabouts.

I've a single ring on my 26er and a 29er SS, with 22-36 you'll be fine unless you really are built like John Prescot and considder thw wheet content in pie pastry as one of your vegetables.


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 1:00 pm
Posts: 3355
Full Member
 

To be honest I don't think I noticed the difference on my 29er. Ran the same chainring sizes and the same cassette size. Once you get the wheels turning it's fine, I imagine you may notice on slow techy climbs, but probably not anywhere else.


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Went from 26er with 11-32 cassette to 29er with 11-36 cassette.

Hated it and ditched the 11-36 after three rides; put 11-32 on the 29er and all much better. Stupid pointless dinner-plate sized sprockets that never got used. Want to spin it? That's what the granny ring is for.

lovewookie +1


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 1:33 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

The Gear Seer website is quite useful for visualising and comparing gearings:
http://www.andrusia.com/gearseer/#

As is Sheldon's gear calculator:
http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/

But more importantly [url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/psa-loose-is-the-opposite-of-tight ]you should read this[/url] ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers guys.
GrahamS, ooops I promise I'll lose the loose 'o's.

Stimpy, you need some bigger/steeper hills. I was talking about using all of the 36 with a 22 granny to get up stuff [url= http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=359665&Y=444605&A=Y&Z=120 ]like this on last night's ride[/url]


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 2:47 pm
Posts: 6273
Full Member
 

Tyres on a 29er are typically a little narrower than on a 26" bike. So, using Sheldon's calculator and assuming a bottom gear of 24x36 (not that it matters for the percentage of course), we get:

60-559 = 17.6 inches
56-622 = 19.4 inches

So the bottom gear on the 29er is 10.2% higher than on the 26" bike.

Or, as matthew_h said in the first post "about 10%" ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 3:02 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Stupid pointless granny rings that never got used. Want to spin it? That's what the dinner-plate sized sprocket is for.

FTFY ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 25/04/2013 3:27 pm