To describe whether something is mountainbiking, I like Didnthurt’s proposal, but propose an addition third rule:

1: Your tyres must touch dirt/mud at some point during the ride.

2: You must have fun during the ride (type 1) or after reminiscing (type 2)

3: You must at some point while on dirt/mud, stand up for the purpose of improved handling of your bike.

Still suitable to be able to “do mountainbiking” on your hybrid/gravel/shopping bike, and not gatekeeping on equipment or local terrain. And conversely, if I were to go for a quick local trip to a friends house (on my mountain bike) it would not be mountainbiking.

Let’s face it, a lot of what, traditionally was called XC mountain biking is in fact gravel biking and is better served by using a gravel bike because they’re quicker and more fun.

I don’t think MTB actually exist it’s a marketing ploy from the 90s.

I just ride bikes some times it’s off road sometimes it’s not.

We used to go to nice places and ride most weekends but this has gradually declined as we are more concerned about the environment and our impact. Now most of our “MTB” riding is for holidays and if we go somewhere for some other reasons and can fit in an off road ride.

Age affects what I will ride now as at 70 I don’t bounce like I used to and have no desire to be taken of a hill by Mountain Rescue.

What might be a more useful discusion is around car speeds and driver behaviour as I often feel unsafe on the road. It’s quite hard to do any bike ride completely off road unless you go to a bike park or trail centre and driver behaviour and attitudes to cycling can be appauling.

The other thing that most often gets ignored is the environmental impact of offroad riding and may become a issue. (See the Coed y Brenin discussion)

I don’t and won’t buy a magazine or click open a link that showcases or reviews MTBs with motors.

Zero interest.

I do, however, have an electric cargo bike, but that’s a utility and not a play bike.

We used to go to nice places and ride most weekends but this has gradually declined as we are more concerned about the environment and our impact.

Go enjoy yourself. Nothing you do will make a shred of difference to the environment (even if you were flying a private jet to go riding every weekend)

I don’t think MTB actually exist it’s a marketing ploy from the 90s.

The French got it right with VTT. If we’d not let ourselves be influenced by the Americans we’d not be having this discussion.

In the UK, mountain land is defined as that over 610m. Therefore, you’re not mountain biking if you are cycling below that altitude.

FWIW, as a runner, we call thin, sinuous paths singletrack too. It’s an explanation of path type, not a definition of what type of bicycle you can use on it.

Kramer
Let’s face it, a lot of what, traditionally was called XC mountain biking is in fact gravel biking and is better served by using a gravel bike because they’re quicker and more fun.

Depends what you used to ride and call XC? I know somebody who said similar so I took him for a local (what I call XC ride) and he nearly cried. Rutted bridleways, rooty forest paths, dried horse hoof prints and the odd drop or jump when we can find it.

Look at the world cup XC courses, would you ride those on a gravel bike?

“Nothing you do will make a shred of difference to the environment (even if you were flying a private jet to go riding every weekend)”

A very American or Chinese approach then.

Let’s get some Lignite burning power stations built to charge those eMTBs

Can we not just go back to ATB?

If you time travelled back to 1995 and gave the bike designers of the day access to modern materials/construction/components, but showed them nothing about the last 30 years of bike racing, or trail centres etc; I reckon they would come up with something pretty much like a modern gravel bike.

I’m not sure if they would. In 1995 MTBs were were growing in popularity but still new and exciting, with new ideas still being tried and forms of riding/racing being fleshed out.

Fast forward to ~2015 MTBs had become a mainstay of the cycling world, and had diversified into various sub-niches with specialist types of ‘MTB’ for each market, there’s more money and marketing behind MTBs but arguably very few truly ‘new’ concepts were being dreamed up just tweaking some angles and adding the odd cog and pissing people about with new “standards”.

Then along comes “Gravel bikes” which were really just a reimagining of CX bikes with a bit more tyre girth and better (MTB derived brakes and gears (a bit like like in the earlier days of MTB in many ways), plus there were fewer definitions over what “gravel riding” is/was or indeed what (if any) rules applied to the kit to be used. Another decade beyond that there’s still grumpy sods for whom MTBs are the pinnacle of cycling and Gravel bikes are nonsense (Who I’m sure would love comparisons to the miserable gits on old touring bikes in the 80s rubbishing those new fangled MTBs), and the “Gravel bike” is in the throws of being defined, divided into Sub-niches and marketed back to the sweaty masses.

It’s all been done before. Gravel is in the ascendancy today as much because the MTB has sort of run through that 30 years of niche creation and marketing hype and a backlash with some alternative attitudes was due. The zeitgist has already changed for gravel too; people seem to simultaneously love and hate “competitive” gravel or sneer at/embrace crusty bike packers on their laden Surleys in equal measure.

If you gave 2024 bicycle technologies to the 1995 bike industry, they’d still creep along the same trajectory of incremental changes to the MTB, it was the part of cycling with a buzz around it at the time. Curly barred bikes just weren’t in the place to be meddled with back then.

“Is it even MTBing?”
I suppose you at least need a simple definition of what MTBing actually is to answer that question, In my head it’s still simply riding a bike off-road. So I guess Gravel bikes count too, but I’m sure there’s now people who would consider themselves Gravel bikers not MTBers, who are less enamoured with what seem like expensive complex toys to the uninitiated.

Personally I still have a grumpy attitude to E-bikes, but E-MTBs do still ‘count’ IMO.

Perhaps the more pertinent question is does it really matter?

The mag is Called ‘Singletrack’ which simply implies “off-road cycling” to me, so I don’t see why the whole gate-keepy debate over the legitimacy of what you might ride on whatever trails is needed.

The terrain/destinations/adventures/events should speak for themselves, if people get hung up on the tools used they’ve already missed the point really.

I think that the key word in my statement was traditionally. XC has moved on, and rightly so IMO. It could still do with being even more technical, until professional road racers can’t just dip in and win.

There’s literally only 2 on the mens (can’t think of any women currently) side who do this with any success and they just happen to have grown up racing offroad and never stopped either. Granted MVDP has only really done CX for the last couple of years mainly due to so many of the big road racing suiting him (Worlds 23 and Olympics 24). Pidcock has done less CX and more MTB.

If anything those 2 coming in make it more exciting as it can turn the racing on it’s head.

the deciding factor is stem length, more than 50mm and its not “mountain bikin’ ” any more..

If you think what you’re doing is mountain biking, it’s mountain biking. You don’t have to let anyone else set a criteria.

You can then pick a media outlet that matches your taste and definition of enjoyable biking, which may or may not be Singletrack.

For me, a mountain bike ride is when the ride involves a mountain bike* and some single-track.

*its evolved over the years, but like the definition of species,  it might be a bit loose and ill-defined, but every knows one when they see it.

As Bula hatted child of the golden days of early mtb – while a contemporary lens may see the way we rode as ATB, we still rode massive mountains and proper sketch terrain with a nonchalant disregard to the sanctity of our bones. This type of bike is still my favourite type of bike, the sort of bike that is good to ride anywhere and everywhere. In my mind the Atb is closer to the heart of Mtb – if the picture of a modern Mtb has a motor on it, then I’m not an Mtb’er anymore.

Mountain biking is clearly defined by being the pastime of people who at most opportunities will dismiss gravel and or electric bikes.

I ride a modern “gravel” bike with flat bars and 2″ xc tyres

No, you ride a hybrid, or maybe a 90’s style MTB. Gravel bikes have drop bars.

Anyway, I think Mountain Biking covers such a broad church, from downhill at Fort William to bimbling along a fire road.

Gravel I see as closer to road than MTB, but I accept that’s just a personal view. If I was going mountain biking I wouldn’t have drop bars (even if Tomac did).

“Nothing you do will make a shred of difference to the environment (even if you were flying a private jet to go riding every weekend)”

A very American or Chinese approach then.

Let’s get some Lignite burning power stations built to charge those eMTBs

Its exactly that approach that means you shouldn’t sacrifice driving somewhere to ride your bike on the weekend

Didn’t he also use drops to be in the same position as when on his road bike that he was racing on rather than because he was some sort of predictor of the gravel bike.

No, you ride a hybrid, or maybe a 90’s style MTB. Gravel bikes have drop bars.

No, ragley trig is marketed as a gravel bike, drop bars are a bit tricky to manual or pull off a decent bunnyhop with so flats with cowhorns fitted inside brakes for moar aero, it has room for chunky tyres and gets ridden regularly on chunky trails.  So yep hybrid .. 🤔