The Starling Fallacy: 36 Pages of Redemption

by 51

It seems it’s the season for publishing big fancy books about your brand. Here’s the latest addition to the bike library, from Starling Cycles:

Born in the depths of the NSMB forum, the Starling Fallacy is Starling’s deepest, darkest secret.

It lurked in wait, exposing the core of the brand’s being; its modus operandi; its original sin. But like all secrets, it would never rest, never die, never cease. It would always be there, in the shadows, threatening the heart of Starling Cycles.

And so, Starling Cycles founder Joe McEwan has decided that enough is enough. Like all good internet conspiracies, he knew that the fallacy was based in truth. And so, it’s time to come clean.

The game is up. Starling is no more. Steel and single pivot is not, in fact, real.

“The Starling Fallacy holds that somehow great geometry and shed manufacturing can overcome the performance issues of a true single-pivot bike. And, since we know that great geometry is free and easily duplicated we can further boil down the fallacy to say that shed manufacturing alone can overcome said issues. 

You don’t even have to produce all your bikes in the shed – just some of them. And so, riders who absolutely would not accept the performance of a simple no-linkage true-uni-pivot design from a major manufacturer or even a smaller manufacturer will gush about the descending prowess of a Starling.”

Andrew Major, NSMB

The Starling Fallacy – Available To Order Now

To mark the final chapter of Starling Cycles, McEwan has decided to lift the lid on the brand with a limited edition, 36-page, hardback coffee table quality print journal entitled the ‘Starling Fallacy’. Intended as part memoirs and part confession the book will allow McEwan the opportunity to come clean and for, he hopes, redemption. 

“Being honest” says McEwan in the opening chapter entitled ‘Got Fired? Fire Up The Welder’ “I just needed a job after I got sacked from my Aerospace gig”.

“I’d been mountain biking a couple of times so I thought I’d give it a shot. I wasn’t sure how to make any money from it, but I knew that would come pretty easily”. 

Nailed It. 

Joe admits that he quickly spotted a gap in the market: “there were frame builders all over the place and it looked pretty easy. You just copy some geometry from another brand and make it a bit longer, lower and slacker. Then you stick a few tubes together and Bob’s your uncle.” 

Joe’s enthusiasm wasn’t held back by a lack of resources and, he admits, inspiration was drawn from the world around him. “I only had the shed to work in because the wife wouldn’t let me weld in the house, so I worked in there. I bought a welder from eBay and prayed I wouldn’t blow up the garden. And yeah, I needed a name for the ‘brand’ and was in a rush to get to the pub on a Friday so I just picked the first thing I spotted out of the window, a Starling on the garden fence. Nailed it.”

Joe quickly realised that his new brand had exposed something bigger “They honestly couldn’t get enough of it. It was like people saw the shed, saw how basic the bikes were and were willing to pay double what they would for a proper bike. It was nuts. I jacked the price up after I’d built a couple and the cash just came rolling in.”

My First Million.

Frame design was obviously critical and the chapter of the book entitled ‘Mo Pivots, Mo Problems. One Pivot, Mo Money’ bears all.

“Kinematics? No idea. I basically just looked at a load of old bikes online and copied those. People seemed to love the idea of a bike with loads of brake jack, disposable shock bushings and suspension that didn’t work when you pulled the stoppers. It was like the more basic you made it, the more they wanted to convince themselves it would work.”

“Once I’d made the suspension as absolutely low-tech as I possibly could, I had one final brain wave: ‘What if we make it out of the oldest, heaviest, thinnest, easiest-to-snap material possible?’ Steel was the obvious choice. The internet went bananas for it and I made my first million”.

McEwan, currently based in The Bahamas hopes that by sharing his story riders will see the true value of simple, steel, single-pivot bikes and continue to believe the hype.

Once sales of the limited edition print journal ‘The Starling Fallacy’ are complete, he intends to sell the business to a major bicycle manufacturer.

Order your copy of The Starling Fallacy here.

https://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/nicolai-goes-nathan-barley-or-somewhere-the-sun-doesnt-shine/
https://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/world-book-day-2022-books-for-cyclists/

Singletrack Weekly Word

Sports Newsletter of the Year finalist at the Publisher Newsletter Awards 2024. Find out why our newsletter is different and give it a go.

Author Profile Picture
Hannah Dobson

Managing Editor

I came to Singletrack having decided there must be more to life than meetings. I like all bikes, but especially unusual ones. More than bikes, I like what bikes do. I think that they link people and places; that cycling creates a connection between us and our environment; bikes create communities; deliver freedom; bring joy; and improve fitness. They're environmentally friendly and create friendly environments. I try to write about all these things in the hope that others might discover the joy of bikes too.

More posts from Hannah

Home Forums The Starling Fallacy: 36 Pages of Redemption

Viewing 11 posts - 41 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • The Starling Fallacy: 36 Pages of Redemption
  • chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    “Copyright issues can be waived for the purpose of satire.”

    Yes but you can’t take one person’s piece of satire and repeat it and pass it off as your own – that’s what Starling did. They might not be selling product directly but they are using it as a tongue-in-cheek way to market their products. It’s commercial misuse of someone else’s work.

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    Was the original work satire?

    LAT
    Full Member

    didn’t brant richards use the comments a disgruntled customer made on this forum in the promo material for the last bikes he did for on one? made from gas pipe and will rust spring to mind.

    a similar but not identical situation.

    phutphutend
    Full Member

    Just thought I’d better pop up to give Starling’s point.

    Omitting Andrew Major’s credit was in fact a genuine error. He was credited in an early draft, but then got missed in final version that got sent to media outlets and newsletter subscribers. We have since done all we can to correct, but it perhaps didn’t happen quick enough due to it being the weekend. We will make a public apology very soon.

    Maybe we should have included him from the start, but as it was just in comments section, we didn’t really think we needed to? A lesson learnt maybe…

    I’ve spoken to Andrew, and there’s no bad feelings.

    It’s hard work trying to be satirical!!

    LAT
    Full Member

    It’s commercial misuse of someone else’s work.

    would the contents of a post in the comments section under an article be part of his body of work?

    edit: just seen the above post

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    didn’t brant richards use the comments a disgruntled customer made on this forum in the promo material for the last bikes he did for on one? made from gas pipe and will rust spring to mind.

    a similar but not identical situation.

    His latest venture uses snidey comments from social media in its advertising, amongst some interesting copy.

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    BruceWee

    Like it or not, it is plagiarism. Unless you want to argue that it somehow falls outside the scope because it was in a comment on the article rather than the article itself.

    It’s plagiarism… but using a quote someone posted on a forum in an April Fool’s post is hardly the most egregious example. If they had lifted his article and used it in actual advertising copy, fair enough.

    BruceWee
    Free Member

    I don’t know many companies who would commission and pay someone to put an April Fools prank together as Starling did in this case.

    Like it or not, getting exposure through clever use of social media is how many companies advertise these days.

    As Max Dubler said in the blog I posted earlier, some companies take advantage of this grey area between advertising and social media to avoid paying photographers and it wouldn’t surprise me if the same thing went on with writing.

    I’m not saying this is what happened here, just that companies should be very careful how they handle their guerrilla marketing campaigns and avoid the appearance of trying to get something for nothing.

    TheGingerOne
    Full Member
    honourablegeorge
    Full Member
    oxym0r0n
    Full Member

    For completeness, here’s the apology posted on the Starling website here

    Sorry for the repeat post 🙄

Viewing 11 posts - 41 through 51 (of 51 total)

The topic ‘The Starling Fallacy: 36 Pages of Redemption’ is closed to new replies.