What, a laptop with a pixel count higher than 2048?×?1536, the pixel count of a 9.3″ iPad 3? I don’t believe you.
You’d used an iPad3 when I posted that? Or even when you posted that? 😯 (I presume being a fanboi you were posting from the queue outside the Apple store, so have one now and hoping to catch me out 🙄 )
Presumably iPad and iPad2 are completely useless if that’s your standard for a “high enough” resolution. It’s amazing how we’ve coped for so long without the complete collapse of civilization – thank god the wait for a portable device with a resolution of 2048×1536 is finally over.
So you’re comparing with your rubbish hot, heavy MBP again? There are of course other smaller, lighter, cooler, more portable options in laptops (I mean your favourite company even makes the Macbook Air – though the keyboard isn’t as good on one of those as my Lenovo).
And I don’t care whether your laptop has GPS and maps on it
Well I don’t care whether your iPad has GPS and maps on it – I’m no more likely to take one of those on a hike than my laptop, and I don’t suppose most people on here, most laptop users, or even most iPad users are either. Seems a pretty rubbish idea to me. Of course you can put maps on a laptop and take it out if you want to, and you can get laptops with a 10 hour battery life. You’re just being silly again.
You see, your arguments aren’t that the iPad is better than a laptop, they’re that the iPad is better than a laptop for you. Well I agree with you – an iPad is probably better than a laptop for some of the things you do, whoop-de-doo.