convert - Member
Al, no you are right - the claim against the hospital bit was only mentioned on our local news with little other details (apart from the hospital admitting a paperwork irregularity but denying responsibility for her injuries). It does strike me though, as Jamie intimated above, that she is casting about for anyone who could help shoulder some of her problems. But they just that – her problems – from her actions.
You may know more than the rest of us about this, but I suspect it's baised.
joao3v16 - Member
Why can't some folk take responsibility for their own actions....
It's the spirit of the age. Unfortunately. You can see it everywhere.
Everyting is always someone elses fault, or someone elses responsibility to do sort out.
The litigation culture has exacerbated this mindset. Or created it. I can't decide which way round it is.
Been reading the tabloids?
As uual this is an extreme case reported with limited information, so it looks bad.
If she has a valid or arguable claim against a third party then should she not be allowed to pursue it? If the law is wrong then that ought to be changed - but that's a separate issue.
What I would say to you both is if you were in this situation (and I understand the state help for those with these sorts of disabilities is not going ot be fantastic) would you hold the same view?
Easy to be sanctimonious behind a keyboard, but we've all taken risks and done stupid things, could happen to any of us.
PS love the earlier use of "crippling"