well i just watched the south park link... So now I know how cameron does it... He just put food up his arse 
Chat Forum
[closed]
The Pope is having another rant - WTF?!
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
Shit. I sold mine for only £50. Ive been robbed.
Well next time you'll believe in marx teaching rather than "the market will sort himself out"Posted 1 year ago # -
If thats empathetic, then Im the Spanish Inquisition!
"Nobody suspects the Inquisition!"
Posted 1 year ago # -
well i just watched the south park link...
I love the Love boat bit at the beginning. its just hilarious!
Posted 1 year ago # -
No such thing. Have we done this?
Proof please.
Woppit massively missed the point, and apparently continues to
Posted 1 year ago # -
yes we had pages of razor sharp insights like that from our very own anti-christ. He was always reasonable, respectful and never offensive or hysterical. IIRC he does not like to blow his own trumpet and modesty is almost definitely his middle name rather than supercilious smug git as some suggest.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Irony is completely lost on molgrips, as usual.
Posted 1 year ago # -
There's no such thing as an anti-christ, because.... etc.
Posted 1 year ago # -
"Well next time you'll believe in marx teaching rather than "the market will sort himself out"
Juan....... you are my new favourite poster
Posted 1 year ago # -
Which one of you is the pope?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Missed the irony? You missed it! I was addressing you not Alex222
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'm sorry, I must have misunderstood you. What "point" was it that I missed, in your opinion?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Mr. Woppit,
I understand from previous posts you were part of our flock at one time and now you seem troubled and resentful of Christ's love. What happened in your life to make you feel this way?
I pray that you will come back to us one day.
Let us all pray for Mr. WoppitPosted 1 year ago # -
You know what, I'm an atheist (well agnostic really) but I'll make up some silly prayers to one of the various 'only' gods out there to save his soul just to wind him up
Posted 1 year ago # -
I was never part of a flock, as you put it. Although the attempt was made to infect me with that particular strain of virus, I was able to see that not only had the emperor no clothes but that there was in fact, no emperor at all.
Indoctrination of the young into religious dogma (a form of child abuse) has to be completed early to be effective.
Still waiting for the mol to enlighten me as to the point that I apparently missed.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'm surprised to see this news story is published in the UK but it is a very concerning situation here in Belgie.
The church were governing their own investigation into the hundreds of claims of sexual abuse from priests / church representatives & they were keeping the findings of the investigation secret to 'protect the identity of the victims'.
It is believed by the police / CPS equivalent were trying to find victims files that were 'hidden' hence their quite extensive searching which is one of the items that particularly upset the church.Posted 1 year ago # -
Indeed - as I understand it they drilled into some tombs/etc - frankly I think it sounds reasonable given the lengths that the Catholic church has been shown to be willing to go to in order to protect its image.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Mr. Woppit,
I understand from previous posts you were part of our flock at one time and now you seem troubled and resentful of Christ's love. What happened in your life to make you feel this way?
I pray that you will come back to us one day.
Let us all pray for Mr. Woppit
Posted 1 year ago # -
+1
Posted 1 year ago # -
Still waiting for the mol to enlighten me as to the point that I apparently missed.
The argument on the God threads wasn't about the existence of God.
It was about the concepts behind belief systems.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Oh dear...
mol, If you read alex222's post, he says, in response to "No proof. Have we done this?": "Proof please"
I assumed that anybody reading this, in the context of the discussion, would think that he is asking for "Proof" of the existence of god, that being to do with the first part of my sentence.
However, I chose to treat his request as if he was asking for proof of the second part of my sentence, that is, the existence of a thread in which we had "done this", and use it to explain what I thought of the FIRST possible meaning, therefor making my response ironic in context.
I don't see how either of your statements: "I was addressing you not Alex222 " or "The argument on the God threads wasn't about the existence of God. It was about the concepts behind belief systems." has anything at all to do with this, but I expect you'll try and show us how they do...
Posted 1 year ago # -
Christ, Woppit, take it easy!
Posted 1 year ago # -
here, its not up to the non-believers to dis-prove the existence of God; it is up to the misguided to PROVE the existence of him!
Posted 1 year ago # -
molgrips - Member
Christ, Woppit, take it easy!
See what you did there, like it.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Very drôle, Juan.
And for once you've used politico-economic theory in the correct context.
Top of the class
Now back to the Woppit Sunday Worship show...
Posted 1 year ago # -
Now back to the Molgrips Sunday Worship show...
What? Am I missing something again?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Edited. Sorry molgrips, I don't know why but I confuse your names, not your personas though you understand!
Posted 1 year ago # -
endless argument about the existance of god, but the argument about the churches failure to act to protect innocent abuse victims, and the popes active part of a cover up to protect the clergy involved, will damage it more than anything else
i hopePosted 1 year ago # -
Very drôle, Juan.
And for once you've used politico-economic theory in the correct context.
Top of the class
And for once you've use correct spelling drôle
Top of the class Posted 1 year ago # -
And for once you've use correct spelling drôle
[pedant]the use of another language in this instance is quite superfluous as the English word 'Droll' has almost exactly the same meaning and is also homophonic to the French word above[/pedant]
Posted 1 year ago # -
khani - Member
endless argument about the existance of god, but the argument about the churches failure to act to protect innocent abuse victims, and the popes active part of a cover up to protect the clergy involved, will damage it more than anything else
i hope+1 Complicit to the act itself
Posted 1 year ago # -
highclimber - Member
"...his visit is estimated to cost the UK taxpayer £20million"
where's the source of that? seems rather excessive for a bloke racist in a funny hat to visit!
Was sourced from here ...
Not affected by the recession then?He's obviously not stopping with Lenny at a Premier Inn!
Posted 1 year ago # -
More to the point, have we proved the existence of Woppit?
Anyway, I thought St Tony of Blair had a direct channel of communication with God, so he ought to be personally funding the trip. He can certainly afford it.Posted 1 year ago # -
Im never selling anything to beelzebub666 on eBay again, that's for sure.
c'mon, I always give prompt feedback(
)
Posted 1 year ago # -
He's obviously not stopping with Lenny at a Premier Inn!
I'd chip in for him to share a room with Lemmy at a Premier Inn, if that helps out.Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
