"let's keep changing the subject to suit..."Labrat!
I saw this girl today, she must have been at least 12...so I asked her what she thought of libertarian socialism.
Chat Forum
[closed]
socialism vs capitalism......
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
<Yawn>
You are a boring ****Posted 2 years ago # -
Donothing, what does it explain?
You are quite obviously too stupid to understand.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Didn't Churchill also say "if you still believe in the sixth form ideal of socialism once you've actually lived life a little..you're as thick as sh1t" ... or words to that effect ! !
Posted 2 years ago # -
see last post
Posted 2 years ago # -
see last post
which one son?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Pleasure to oblige Ernie
Heres a nice thought for you:
a socialist policy is abhorrent to the British ideas of freedom. Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the object worship of the state.
Point me towards a Socialist government that has achieved libertarianism (Libertarian socialism?) and I'll gladly disappear back into my box...
Posted 2 years ago # -
my last one laddie
Posted 2 years ago # -
my last one laddie
backhander's penultimate post,
<Yawn>
You are a boring ****Proved to be false by the fact he is now courting me, craving my attention.
Posted 2 years ago # -
a socialist policy is abhorrent to the British ideas of freedom.
Is that the freedom to be selfish and materialistic?
Posted 2 years ago # -
is that the freedom to be selfish and materialistic?
Yes.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Is that the freedom to be selfish and materialistic?
If that is a freedom that you want to subcribe to, then yes!
I see you had quite a sale going a few weeks ago!
Posted 2 years ago # -
mavisto - Member
Hadn't realised until tonight but I agree with Winston Churchill. I am totally sick of major government intervention in everything I do.And pray tell, what type of govt has been interfering in your private business? Do you consider nulabour "socialist"?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Mavisto:
"Hadn't realised until tonight but I agree with Winston Churchill. I am totally sick of major government intervention in everything I do."Quite right too.
Bloody government, provided me with education that my parents couldn't have afforded, kept my wife & kids alive through the health service, builds the roads I use, organised the utilities until they were privatised, pays for the police and army etc.Just get rid of it, that's what I say.
Posted 2 years ago # -
If that is a freedom that you want to subcribe to, then yes!
I see you had quite a sale going a few weeks ago!
I dunno it just seems that mostly when people talk about wanting freedom from government intervention they mean freedom to be a selfish ****. ie freedom from speed cameras stopping them driving like a ****, or freedom from paying a bit of tax to pay for vital services.
Posted 2 years ago # -
mavisto - Member
I am totally sick of major government intervention in everything I do.
I have confess mavisto, that I am also intrigued in which way there has been 'major government intervention in everything you do'.
Do you own a bank ?
And why are you 'totally sick' of it ?
Posted 2 years ago # -
organised the utilities until they were privatised
Hmm, who built the Utilities infrastructure? Socialist government or Capitalist entrepreneurs?
Or the Railways?
Ernie, maybe Mevisto agreed with another parent to share child care, and had OFSTED threatening to prosecute him?
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'd like the freedom to smoke fags in pubs with real men. Until that time arises, I'll reside abroad where I can draw pictures of my crotch in peace and use the Satchi Gallery to provide me with earnings above what I think is reasonable to pay taxes on.
Posted 2 years ago # -
And pray tell, what type of govt has been interfering in your private business? Do you consider nulabour "socialist"?
I didn't say interfering, I said intervening. For example, Taxing alcohol heavily to stop binge drinking. This has the effect of punishing the many for the actions of the few. It also means that the nice country pubs have to close because ordinary people that enjoy a quiet pint can't afford to drink in them.
Also, speed cameras. Attempt at mass control rather than actually catching the dangerous drivers.
I aslo think the compulsory wearing of seatbelts is an infringement of human rights. I should have the choice of going through the windscreen if I want to.
Oh and Nulabour are Thatcherite
Posted 2 years ago # -
I didn't say interfering, I said intervening.
And you avoided answering my simple question. But that's because you don't wish to admit that the evil capitalistical Tories are the source of most of your woe.
Edit. But you can edit I see...still, how does/did Socialism infringe your rights?
Posted 2 years ago # -
I aslo thing the compulsory wearing of seatbelts is an infringement of human rights. I should have the choice of going through the windscreen if I want to.
Why are you blaming socialism for that ?
.
It was introduced by Margaret Thatcher. She was in the same political party as your hero Winston Churchill.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I aslo thing the compulsory wearing of seatbelts is an infringement of human rights.
Quick someone call Amnesty!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I need change and I don't mean just a change from the previous bunch of loosers. PR, coalitions, hell, lets go back to a full blown monarchy. Anything had got to be better than this. If something doesn't change we are really going to be in trouble for generations to come.
I don't support the Tories or Labour or the Lib Dems. I don't support any of them because I think for myself and not on the basis of some old ideology that has no place in a 21 century world.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I think for myself and not on the basis of some old ideology that has no place in a 21 century world.
But you think, quote : "full blown monarchy", isn't some old ideology that has no place in a 21 century world ?
How strange
Posted 2 years ago # -
BTW mavisto, do you think Diana should have worn her seatbelt ?
Posted 2 years ago # -
hell, lets go back to a full blown monarchy
I don't support any of them because I think for myself and not on the basis of some old ideology that has no place in a 21 century world.
I wonder if I'm the first...
Posted 2 years ago # -
No. Ah well.
Posted 2 years ago # -
And to all of you dyed in the wool socialists. Here is a list of socialist countries.
Please emmigrate to one of them and see how you get on. I'll see you in a fortnight!!
Posted 2 years ago # -
BTW mavisto, do you think Diana should have worn her seatbelt ?
No,it should be her choice.
Posted 2 years ago # -
sorry, it was her choice.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Here is a list of socialist countries.Please emmigrate to one of them...
I'm off to Vancouver, in that Canada in a few months time. It has "Socialised healthcare". Bummer for me.
Posted 2 years ago # -
sorry, it was her choice.
Did you miss her ? .................... as someone who supports 'going back to a full blown monarchy' ?
BTW, you still haven't answered my question about wearing a seatbelt - why is it socialism ?
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm off to Vancouver, in that Canada in a few months time. It has "Socialised healthcare". Bummer for me.
I'm so sorry for you. It's a Conservative government and the Liberals are in opposition.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Socialist != communism
Besides, why can't we stay here, not everyone in this country is a selfish bastard like you.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm so sorry for you. It's a Conservative government
But isn't free at the point of delivery healthcare inherently socialist (and therefore evil according to Americans)?
Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
