Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Scaled Sizing instead of pseudo-religious wheel size debates?
  • hock
    Full Member

    Liteville muses that any discussion about the one and only “best” size for bike wheels is obsolete. Like with frame sizes, stem sizes etc. there’s also a need to put wheel size into perspective of rider size.

    The more interesting bit is that they suggest that slightly bigger wheels on the front might be worth considering. Thus 650B/27,5 is a welcome addition to 24, 26 and 29 in providing the perfect step for their bodysize-based wheelsize-recommendation.

    By the way: they do mention that personal preference and riding style might still be a good reason to ride whatever you like no matter what size you are. 🙂

    Interesting?!

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    FTFY

    clubber
    Free Member

    Anyone who says that a fixed wheel size is the best as an absolute is an idiot. It’s like saying that a particular length of stem is best.

    RobHilton
    Free Member

    particular length of stem is best

    For the record; it’s 50mm

    no_eyed_deer
    Free Member

    For the record; it’s 50mm

    +1 😉

    clubber
    Free Member

    Idiot.

    It’s 90mm every time

    PimpmasterJazz
    Free Member

    I beg to differ.

    Mountain biking started on this downward spiral when people stopped riding 150mm stems.

    And toe clips.

    mrhoppy
    Full Member

    I think you need an inbetween size maybe a 62mm but we’ll call it 70 so it looks like its directly half way.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Ideally, we would call it 2.8″.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    But for that philosophy to work you need seperate trails with scaled features, so my 5ft2 missus would need a trail with rocks that a 24″ wheel would roll over as easily as a 29″ wheel rolls over bigger stuff.

    As long as the handling’s fine then IMO bigger wheels = better.

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    Ideally, everything would be proportional – geometry & frame tube thickness as well as wheel size, fork travel, control points & tyre pressure.

    Think of how the body and the bike interact – shouldn’t this be the same regardless of size?

    hock
    Full Member

    Ideally, everything would be proportional

    And that’s probably what is mostly done anyway:
    – geometry often varies slightly with frame size
    – some companies use additional gussets etc. for bigger frame sizes
    – taller people will tend to use frames and forks with more travel and vice versa
    – control points can be adjusted (e.g. lever reach)
    – tyre pressure is adjusted to personal preference and that includes weight
    – the same is true for fork and damper settings
    – we have mentioned stems, but grips, handlebars, even saddles qualify, too(different width)
    – a few people will use longer or shorter crankarms than the standard 175mm

    Thus questioning 26″ as the only wheelsize and even thinking about serveral sizes to suit different body-sizes suddenly makes a lot more sense, doesn’t it?

    Anyway: what about bigger front than rear wheel? Any experience?

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘Scaled Sizing instead of pseudo-religious wheel size debates?’ is closed to new replies.