is anyone on this thread interested in the performance of any of the bikes mentioned???
the only comments seem leveled at the 'looks' of the bike or the perceived strength of the frame and the perceived aftersales back-up.
If i was spending a lot of money on a DH frame i would be first thinking about the ride of the frame that i am looking for, then finding something that suits.
Do you want a really light flickable bike with a lively suspension feel, for tighter techy courses.
Or, a stable bike that feels solid at high speeds.
Or, adjustable geometry.
What shock do you want (one of the most important things in my opinion)
Loads of other similar questions to ask yourself
Remember that 'warranty' covers manufacturing defects and not flat landing 10 foot drops all day long and bouncing off the bottom out stop. This is abuse of a frame, if it breaks you have to buy a new one. If a weld cracks due to fatique, you have worn it out!
A full season of riding everyday in the Alps or Whistler is fatique. Most bike's 'lifetime' is deemed to be a lot less riding than a full season of riding every day. Maybe two rides a week for 2/3 years would/should constitute the lifetime of an aluminium frame? All aluminium frames have a 'life' and will fatique somewhere.
Trek offering a crash replacement is very kind of them
Fit for purpose, are you buying the right thing???? If you want a lightweight race frame (trek, GT etc) then don't huck drops all day long and case jumps a lot, or ride a full 'season' on it. Race it. If you want to ride a bike hard, flat land drops etc then buy a frame suited to this.