I'm aware of what he's *trying* to show, but I don't think that image supports his view. I cannot see a single plane of focus – I see two distinct areas
Clearly as the whole SIDE of his face is in focus it shows the focal plane is not into/out of the image – the back right hand side of his head should be as in focus as the back left. It is not, this means the focal plane is not parallel to the sensor/viewer. Now as there's no ground/anything in the mid-ground you can't follow that line outwards, but it's fairly easy assume that since the plane appears to dividing the head side to side that following that plane across the valley may well have it impact the side of the mountain opposite. If it did that it would yield a vertical focussed line, as it has on the statue, which would continue to infinity. Which it does (though at infinity everything seems a bit soft, probably due to a poor Q t/s lens?).
If it had been photoshopped I'd at least have expected the head to be centrally focussed and equally unfocussed either side.
I'm not sure where you think the two different planes exist, please indicate so we can compare and see if what you're saying is a more sensible thought process.
I can see the photoshop idea is a compelling one, but if you look at photo 3 of that sequence you can see he has done the same over-dodging around the subject in non-T/S style shots too.
What does that image show? I can't see what you;re trying to emphasise with the lines you've added
I'm aware of what he's *trying* to show, but I don't think that image supports his view
Make your mind up! The red line is the intersect of the plane of focus with the subjects, showing continuity across the valley in a single plane.
I am currently trying to get hold of the photog just to find out 🙂