I suspect people voted for Trump in the same way that 80’s film with Richard Pryor, Brewsters Millions, turned out and the classic vote for ‘none of the above’. People were just fed up with the status Quo.
Correct. Trump is the political equivalent of Jedward, Wagner or Honey G on X-Factor. He’s the rejection of a status quo that assumes people will continue to do what they are told. He’s the spanner in the works and as such he never had to be good, or qualified or careful what he said or did, in fact the less statesman like he acts the better. It’s a bigger f.u to “the elite”.
Given that Trump’s popularity has not improved since, it’s not difficult to imagine a better candidate than Clinton getting elected.
Better candidate can mean many things though. A half decent career politician who isn’t obviously a corrupt hypocrite can probably smash Trump if he or she has a degree of spontaneity about them.
Oprah Winfrey on the other hand is only “better” than Clinton in the context of identity politics, intersectionality and privilege. She’s not qualified at all, and she represents the “corrupt Hollywood elite”. Pitting her against Trump would be like trying to put out a fire with gasoline.