Chat Forum
Michael Foot RIP
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
Only a politician, the fewer the better right?
Posted 1 year ago # -
A rare thing - an honest politician with integrity,
Not really suited for the politics of the 80s and the attendant media circus and politics of personality
Posted 1 year ago # -
He certainly didn't squander his time here.
Posted 1 year ago # -
No tails, he wasn't "only a politician".
He'll be sadly missed by a lot of people.
Posted 1 year ago # -
one question i have to ask, he started as mp for devonport and ended as mp for ebbw vale.
Call me cynical if you wish, but who is he working on behalf of, a constituency, we do live in a constituency based democracy, or himself? If you have the interests of YOUR constituency at heart why change?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Oh come on people..."One Foot in the grave" surely.
But seriously - was he the last of the great orators, killed off by the sound byte hunger of the media? Or the icon of the "Loony Left" image that nearly killed off his party?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Michael Foot wrote this;
"We are not here in this world to find elegant solutions, pregnant with initiative, or to serve the ways and modes of profitable progress. No, we are here to provide for all those who are weaker and hungrier, more battered and crippled than ourselves. That is our only certain good and great purpose on earth, and if you ask me about those insoluble economic problems that may arise if the top is deprived of their initiative, I would answer 'To hell with them.' The top is greedy and mean and will always find a way to take care of themselves. They always do." Which is largely why I do what I do for a job, and puts the shallow vacuous politicians of today to shame.
Posted 1 year ago # -
The flag in Lubyanka Square will be flying at half mast.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Seemed a decent, principled chap to me.
Posted 1 year ago # -
A thoroughly decent man who did good
A damn fine age to survive to also
Posted 1 year ago # -
who ?
Posted 1 year ago # -
goog - Member
who ?Why don't you go get an education and then you'll know.
Posted 1 year ago # -
That really rather sad – although I’d not always agree with his politics, he probably is the last true politician and arguably one of the greatest politician this country has seen. If only there was more like him in the current parliament
Posted 1 year ago # -
and if you ask me about those insoluble economic problems that may arise if the top is deprived of their initiative, I would answer 'To hell with them.' The top is greedy and mean and will always find a way to take care of themselves. They always do."
Its about time we did this.
RIP.
Posted 1 year ago # -
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/03/foot-churchill-labour
Interesting - never realised he supported the Falklands War.
Posted 1 year ago # -
allthepies - Member
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/03/foot-churchill-labourInteresting - never realised he supported the Falklands War.
Why should that suprise you, Mr Foot was from a generation that knew democracy and freedom from dictators had to be fought for no matter what side of politics. Though some left leaning people choke on the thought (cause of fatcha), the Falklands war was against a dictatorship that used the war to distract it's people from what was going on in there country. A bog standard way of maintaining control when things are not going so well. At the time it was fairly well known that the so called government of Argentina was killing it's political enemies who were mostly from the left.
Posted 1 year ago # -
In at "6"
Mind you he was as very good politician and honest. Shame his image let him done
Posted 1 year ago # -
I second that......
'A thoroughly decent man who did good'
Posted 1 year ago # -
Shame that Former Labour leader michael foot has died.
He'll soon be one foot in the grave
Posted 1 year ago # -
I witnessed him speaking at our university union society about 15 years ago.
He was very impressive and interesting. A very intelligent man of integrity.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Hi involvement in worldwar two, and even the run up the world war two is pretty fascinating. He mullered Neville Chamberlain so comprehensively that nobody even considered until recently that Chamberlain might actually have won WW2 for us.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Nick - Member
Why don't you go get an education and then you'll know.
at you .... captain wot wot
Posted 1 year ago # -
He was great on "Spitting Image" - he'll always be remembered for that.
And helping to get Margaret Thatcher elected, of course.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Just heard a stunningly funny speech on R4 where he gently takes the piss out of Keith Joseph. Haven't heard anything that good from a politician in ages.
Posted 1 year ago # -
RIP - a man of integrity and principle!
The values he lived by would be a good example to the rest of us, and in particular some of the other current political personalities that a couple of other current threads are discussing.
Posted 1 year ago # -
He was great on "Spitting Image" - he'll always be remembered for that.
So will Thatcher.
And helping to get Margaret Thatcher elected, of course.
A lot of fools with the vote back then. Much the same today.
Posted 1 year ago # -
And helping to get Margaret Thatcher elected, of course.
I thought it was The Sun wot done it ?
In 1983 Margaret Thatcher, like Ronald Reagan, argued that the financial institutions should be deregulated and allowed to flourish unrestricted in the 'free market'.
Michael Foot rejected that, arguing that the banks should be nationalised to serve the interests of the British people.
He was dismissed as 'looney left' by Murdoch's mouthpiece.
He was of course completely right. And Governments on both sides of the Atlantic were eventually forced to carry out the wholesale nationalisation of financial institutions due to the disastrous consequences of the deregulated free market.
So Reagan, Thatcher, Murdoch, and the minority of the electorate who voted Tory, have been proved to have been wrong, and Michael Foot was right........ still, no great surprise there.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I can recall quite vividly when he became the Labour leader, and in fell swoop set the public's perception of the Labour movement back decades.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Perception isn't always reality, though.
Usually, the publics perception (of anything) is just plain wrong.Posted 1 year ago # -
I've had a pint in his honour today. But NOTHING in comparison to the almighty session that will occur when she goes.
Posted 1 year ago # -
a dam good old age for a fella !
Posted 1 year ago # -
You sad little man, MussEd. You sad little man.
I despise both Brown and Blair in a manner which I find hard to describe. I shall not celebrate their deaths however, as I am not that petty and small minded.
Back on topic - A good innings indeed, for a man who spoke his mind and stuck to his guns. I'd like to see more of his ilk, on any side of the political debate. We'd be better off with more people who spoke their minds in politics.
Posted 1 year ago # -
"In 1983 Margaret Thatcher, like Ronald Reagan, argued that the financial institutions should be deregulated and allowed to flourish unrestricted in the 'free market'.
Michael Foot rejected that, arguing that the banks should be nationalised to serve the interests of the British people.
He was dismissed as 'looney left' by Murdoch's mouthpiece.
He was of course completely right. And Governments on both sides of the Atlantic were eventually forced to carry out the wholesale nationalisation of financial institutions due to the disastrous consequences of the deregulated free market.
So Reagan, Thatcher, Murdoch, and the minority of the electorate who voted Tory, have been proved to have been wrong, and Michael Foot was right........ still, no great surprise there. "
Very well put.
Posted 1 year ago # -
west kipper - Member
Perception isn't always reality, though.
Usually, the publics perception (of anything) is just plain wrong.As is indeed, Ti29er's perception of political events. Quote : "I can recall quite vividly when he became the Labour leader, and in fell swoop set the public's perception of the Labour movement back decades."
Actually in the proceeding months after Michael Foot became leader of the Labour Party, Labour could easily have won a general election. By December 1981, a year after Michael Foot had become leader, Thatcher's personal approval rating fell to 25% - she was by then according to opinion polls, the most unpopular British Prime Minister in history. However by 1983 the breakaway SDP, led by the Gang Of Four, very effectively split the Labour vote in two. Thereby saving Thatcher's skin, and shafting Michael Foot (and the British people)
Posted 1 year ago # -
whatever your political views it's difficult to deny that he was a great public speaker, he grabbed your attention and was passionate with it, don't recall anyone since maggy, john smith and to a certain extent paddy pantsdown to be like that. the current crop of front line politicians sound anything but convincing! tj for pm.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Personally, I mistrust that old thing about respecting someone merely because they're 'a great orator'- I mean those words could be used to admire Enoch Powell, or even Hitler, f'rinstance!
Its WHAT they say (and also in Foot's case, not what they look like) that should be taken note of.Posted 1 year ago # -
CFH - Thanks "old chap" -as I believe you might say- from you I take that as a compliment.
Posted 1 year ago # -
CFH - I don't think MussEd is alone with those sentiments.
I can remember my perfectly sane, law abiding, public sector working parents being rather dissapointed that the Brighton bomb hadn't been more effective! I would only have been 5......
Posted 1 year ago # -
Michael Foot rejected that, arguing that the banks should be nationalised to serve the interests of the British people.
He was dismissed as 'looney left' by Murdoch's mouthpiece.
He was of course completely right. And Governments on both sides of the Atlantic were eventually forced to carry out the wholesale nationalisation of financial institutions due to the disastrous consequences of the deregulated free market.
Can I just check what proportion of the US and British banking systems are currently nationalised? I'd be interested to see the argument that nationalised banks wouldn't have made dodgy investment decisions.You also seem to be ignoring the fact that there is another possibility apart from deregulation and nationalisation.
Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
