I would think the Ti Pigs material / would go along way to the feel not just the weight saving over the Std one, so not really a good / ideal comparison?
Actually in terms of ride feel, there's not much difference between a steel Pig and a Ti one, both supple in a stiff sort of way. So actually it's a pretty good comparison as the geometry is the same and while the parts spec is lighter, it's not remotely fragile or spindly.
It's a near identical bike in terms of geometry and the suppleness of the frame but around 5lb lighter.
That's really what the thing turns on isn't it? If you have two near identical bikes, one of which is a lot lighter, when does the lighter bike feel better. And my take is that it feels better on climbs and anywhere you need to accelerate hard when it's zippier and sharper. And when lifting it over stiles.
If you don't lift your bike over stiles, don't ride somewhere hilly and tend to just trundle up climbs and don't value 'zippiness' in a bike, that won't matter to you. If you do, it will.
Anyway, who cares?
my bike is a 160/160 AM bike, with a Hammerschmidt granted, but offset with light rear cassette and mech no bash chain guard etc. It is built to a bank breaking spec, BUT with components designed to last and perform well in its intended use I.e. Wide wheels for tyre stability, wide bars, tyres that wont pinch flat or slash at the first sight of a sharp alpine rock, and that brick of a component but that makes all the difference a dropper post.
but it ain't cheap and when the going gets steep out comes the big hitter....Winch and plummet 
