Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Legally speaking what can I ride?
  • Warrenpfo
    Free Member

    Just a few questions from a legal stand point. One can ride bridal ways but not footpaths? Although i have been told you can ride footpaths unless it states no cycles so am a little confused?

    I know you can ride what you like untill you caught and that most people ride "cheeky"trails but was just wondering what the law said?

    I am based in Berkshire.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    Better say which country you're in.

    In Scotland you can ride just about anywhere.

    In England you need to start pushing your politicians to get the same rights.

    Warrenpfo
    Free Member

    KS – Thank you for that most helpful. It seems the story I was told about being able to ride a footpath unless it states "no cycles" is unfounded.

    samuri
    Free Member

    Also, it's not technically a law enshrined in English law per se, you're merely breaching a civil ruling if you ride on a footpath (unless there's a specific by law stating otherwise in which case you'll see specific signs saying so) and again, technically the land owners could have you for nuisance or even trespass but it's never happened. If they ask you to leave, just leave..

    edit: And it's only the land owners or their representatives who can do this by the way, a member of the public has no more say in the matter than you do.

    stills8tannorm
    Free Member

    You can however ride a footpath with the landowners consent.

    Warrenpfo
    Free Member

    So it seems its not Law but rather a rule that "most" people adhere too.

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    but rather a rule that "most" people adhere too.

    More like a rule that most people ignore!

    I don't know any riders who just stick to legal trails.

    thomthumb
    Free Member

    not illegal to ride on footpaths

    nbt
    Full Member

    The problem is that we are considering where it is legal to ride baased on what a track is called, e.g. (quoting from the page linked above)

    Types of public rights of way

    England has about 190,000 km (118,000 miles) of public rights of way, providing many opportunities to enjoy the natural environment.

    footpath-yellow

    Footpath – open to walkers only, waymarked with a yellow arrow

    bridleway-blue

    Bridleway – open to walkers, horseriders and cyclists waymarked with a blue arrow

    restricted-purple

    Restricted byway – open to walkers, cyclists, horse riders and horse drawn vehicles. Waymarked with a plum coloured arrow.

    In fact a footpath is a trail where the right to pass on foot is recorded on the definitive map, likewise a bridleway is a trail where the rights of horses and walkers(and cyclists by dint of a subsequent law) are recorded. The fact that a trail is recorded as a footpath DOES NOT MEAN that a cyclist has no rights: merely that they have not been recorded. As Samuri says, if a law has been passed stating that cyclists are forbidden from riding on the trail, a sign will be displayed.

    note that footpath in this sense does not mean the pavement at the side of the road

    Trailseeker
    Free Member
    enduro-aid
    Free Member

    it may not be illegal to ride on footpaths but it's bad form to do it

    Drac
    Full Member

    ooh trailseeker that looks a nice bit of trail.

    br
    Free Member

    Down in the SE I don't worry as it doesn't seem to be a problem at all down here, but I do make sure that when on footpaths I'm very careful around walkers – somewhere like The Lakes or Peaks its probably another story, mainly I guess due to the sheer number of red-socks.

    Drac
    Full Member

    Never poses a problem around here, well very few places, and yes me too when in The Lakes I play strictly to Bridleways only.

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    it may not be illegal to ride on footpaths but it's bad form to do it

    a bit like not wearing a tie at the dinner table ?

    Drac
    Full Member

    Hehehe that was my thought too SfB.

    "Oh bad show old chap!"

    Dave
    Free Member

    Bad form?

    Go on then why's that?

    Drac
    Full Member

    It's just not Cricket Dave.

    enduro-aid
    Free Member

    well put it this way, every morning i walk from the train station to my office (glasgow punters its anderston to charing cross) and every morning at the same time 8.50am or so there is a guy who rides up the foot path and pushes past all the folk walking from the train….all so he doesnt have to cross the junction and ride up the road on the other side

    the other morning he came round the corner and was met by 50 or 60 folk fresh of the train on a narrow footpath, rather than dismount and walk or cross the road and ride up the road he simply pushed his way through the crowd!!

    cyclists should be on the road, trails, cycle paths or shared surface footpaths not footpaths for peds

    Drac
    Full Member

    I can't say I've ever seen 50 or 60 folk in total out on the trails around here on an a Bank Holiday Monday never mind a quiet day.

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    what tosh, a footpath and a pavement are 2 different things

    samuri
    Free Member

    And there are different rules for footways (like pavements) than for footpaths.

    mrvear
    Free Member

    enduro-aid Thats not the kind of footpath folk are talking about here and is bad form.

    mrvear
    Free Member

    Mind you I can't remember the last tome I saw a copper bollock some one for riding on the pavement. Seen plenty of folk ride past police men on the pavement.

    enduro-aid
    Free Member

    SFB if you want to get technical (i'm a civil engineer for Glasgow City)

    In "proper industry terms"

    A pavement is the term used for the bit where the cars etc are what you would call the carriageway.

    A footway is an area for ped use that runs along side the afore mentioned carriageway.

    A footpath is an area of seperate or segregated land for ped use which is not next to a road i.e a path through a park

    cyclists are only allowed on a footway or foot path IF it has been designated for both peds/bikes, this information is generally found within the traffic regulation order for the area

    these are the rules for scotland, they may change for england or wales

    Drac
    Full Member

    Oh not the old "Trust me I'm Engineer" line. 😛

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Dont mind the odd cheeky bit but tend to avoid if att all possible and really only use local ones when it is quiet never really do in Lakes or Wales as plenty of other options.

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    cyclists are only allowed on a footway or foot path IF it has been designated for both peds/bikes, this information is generally found within the traffic regulation order for the area

    Fairly sure that TROs don't have jurisdiction when off specifically built paths (i.e. footpaths through fields). And they have to be specifically applied for IIRC too don't they? Like the fact that half the yellow boxes in the road don't have accompanying TROs and so have no legal backing.

    Riding on footways is bad form but acceptable IMO if done slowly and giving way to pedestrians. Footpaths are open season, but obviously with due care and attention to other users (even in England).

    enduro-aid
    Free Member

    aye coffeeking you are right they have to be applied for but you will find that in most cases footpaths through public areas like parks or gardens will have TRO's in place to stop quads and motorbikes etc using them

    as for the TRO's and yellow boxes in citys, it used to be the law that each street had its own TRO but it has recently changed and we are now putting out blanket TRO's covering half the city

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)

The topic ‘Legally speaking what can I ride?’ is closed to new replies.