I've had first generation Saint brakes for 5yrs but recently the rear brake has had a fair few problems.
So.....I found SLX's (M665) on a for a great deal (half RRP) and ordered both...
Have I done the right thing? Limited reviews on line (inc mtbr).....
I will be using my existing 180 rear and 203 front XT rotors.
Tell me your positives (and negatives)....
Someone will get a good deal when you flog them.
Yes, yes you have. Got SLX, albeit only on commuter and they're good. Factor in needing an extortionately priced olive and insert for when you need to cut the hoses
I don't sell brakes as a rule as they tend to be ****. I still have my Hayes Mags in a cupboard.
Why on just a commuter?!!!!
no, they are crap to set up and crap to keep set up.
i use new saints................ding dong........... 
ton new saints are three times the price.
mark...............quality has no price old mate....... 
They are ace. And for the money a flippin' bargain.
Slx's are awesome, much more reliable than the newer xt brakes. I've got two sets and they've both been perfect, one set vie owned since they were released. Unless your fat, like to brake alot (slow) or have a dh bike you don't need saints (I have a pair of the new ones on my dh bike)
Enjoy!
I am fat and do like to brake alot but the first gen Saints had the same caliper as the Deores so weren't really 'DH' and as such I hopefully wont miss any power. 
Keep the positives coming - I'd have loved a set of new Saints (partly for the stopping piece of mind) however at the moment I really can't justify spending £200 over the £96 I paid for the new SLX's.
Isn't it usually better to ask for advice *before* you order?
But yeah, they're great for the money, doubt you'll be disappointed.
Haha I meant the new saints! I wouldn't want them on a trail bike they're too powerful make revelations+rebas flex rather alot... Not good for the bushings
MrGreedy I fear I have alittle post-purchase cognitive dissonance?
Theres a common theme 'good for the money'. My fear is they are cheap brakes that are slightly cheap in performance. 'You get what you pay for'?
Hora, I had a pair on my prophet when they first cam out. They were great. Apart from the plastic there's no difference in feel to the xtr's that I have at the moment.
my slx have been powerfull, modulatable, reliable, and other good stuff, for 2 years.
oh, yes, and cheap.
the olive+pin costs a quid, and i even like the split-pin pad retention system; there's no need to go mental and bend it over at a right angle, i've found that a simple little 20 degree tweak has been completely reliable, and re-usable, with the added confidence that it'll never seize in place with corrosion after a dirty weekend in the cellar... (i'm looking at you, hope).
as for 'quality' - i'd say it's top-notch, the levers are a bit different from the Xt levers, but not in any way that i could say is worse, or better...
if ever anything stops working, you can get a new calliper, ready assembled, with pads, for £25. and a new lever for about the same.
if you're not impressed, i would be delighted to take them off your hands.
i've got 5 sets of shimano brakes in the cellar (2 deore, 1 slx, 1 lx, 1 xt) and had zero problems for at least 2 years, the deores have been going for more than 4 years.
bleeding is about as tricky as any other brand, and the mineral oil is practically harmless, unlike dot fluid which will make your skin fall off.
the nukeproof 'enduro' pads are very good; long lasting and powerfull - about the same at shimano XTR 'metal', with the added bonus of being very quiet and a bit cheaper.
downsides: they're not 'sexy' - noone will ever point at your brakes approvingly, they're just brakes, and they work quite well.
i personally would not touch any shimano hydro brake.hassle all the way.a sod to bleed aswel.
Good choice, I just said this in another thread but I have the XTs and every time I've used SLX they've annoyed me by being almost identical, but far cheaper.
Big-Bud - Member
"i personally would not touch any shimano hydro brake.hassle all the way. a sod to bleed aswel. "
If you were to touch them, or even actually own them, I reckon you'd find out how wrong you are. My XTs have given a slight niggle when a piston got sticky but have otherwise been perfect, and are very easy to bleed (provided you have the slightest idea what you're doing anyway).
You won't go far wrong with them, I have got SLX and XT's and there is little if any difference in power or modulation, however I do prefer the shape of the SLX lever.
no, they are crap to set up and crap to keep set up.
They're shit off brilliant.
I've only got Shimano brakes on my bikes, brilliant, next to zero maintenance and just work.
Noticed the calipers are slightly different from the SLX to the XT's- the XT and XTR's have a slot to allow removal of the pistons for maintenance?
Ah the SLX is a two-piece caliper whereas the XT is one piece hence the access slot for the piston etc.
gonna be getting me a set as soon as i've got some wonga (and before i head back to the alps in sept...).
Hungry Monkey - £96 posted for the pair- I'd get them now before they sell out.
i've never had to remove the pistons...
once in a while, if i'm bored, i'll take the pads out, pump the lever a few times to pump the pistons out, and dribble a little mineral oil onto the exposed pistons, and push them back in.
i've never needed to do this, it just seems like the right thing to do. except the deore brakes have never recieved this treatment, and they work like new.
Hora- that's just what they cost off ribble.
"hora - Member
Noticed the calipers are slightly different from the SLX to the XT's- the XT and XTR's have a slot to allow removal of the pistons for maintenance?"
As I think you figured out, that's a machining hole not for maintenance, monoblock so they machine out the bores then blank off the entrance wound with the cap.
Shit No! You actually went and bought them? everyone who suggested them was just joking! they'll explode and kill you for sure...
Ok main differences:
1. Circa +70gm extra weight of the SLX brakeset
2. One piece body on XT, two-piece on SLX
3. Fugly (well uglier) levers on XT
4. contact pad adjust feature on the XT - apparently you'd be hard pressed to spot the difference (Bikeradar review)
5. Retention split pin in SLX, bolt in XT.
The decider:
You get a better bleed circuit* on the SLX and the same power without the pointless bite adjust of the XT.
* Apparently the bleed circuit on the XT is a nightmare to get right/remove the air.
Thats it.
Please can you point me in the direction of where you can buy them for £96.
Cheers!
http://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/pp/mtb-bmx-bike/Disc-Brake-Kits/DIBK
Enter TRIP7 in the coupon section as well.
Remember these are without rotors.
Many thanks
i'll get them... but i really need some money first!
someone buy my tandem or kona A!!!
You may find them spongy feeling in comparison to your old ones - this is not a mistake, its the servo-wave doodah and gives you more pad clearance. Learn to love it.
They're on my commuter because that's the bike I needed brakes for and I couldn't find anything else that was better VFM. Got annoyed by my V brakes so swapped for the SLX discs - more brake than is necessary, oh yes!
Love mine, best brakes i've owned as they just work, all the time unlike my old hopes which needed too much tlc. They are more function over form and are alittle bulky but i wouldn't change them now.
This topic has been closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
