I come back and my threads been closed.
Sorry if i offended anyone who manages or works for the doors.
I'm after a copy as i've got it on vinyl but no way of transfering it to my computer.
Chat Forum
I only went for something to eat!
-
Posted 10 months ago #
-
did you pay for that food?!
Posted 10 months ago # -
They're still rubbish[quote]
Posted 10 months ago # -
I hope your going to make up for it by buying lots of merchandise and concert tickets next time they tour.
Posted 10 months ago # -
You cheapskate. Jim Morrison could do with the money, you know.
Posted 10 months ago # -
Oh...what's this about?
Posted 10 months ago # -
Oh...what's this about?
Getting music without paying for it.
Posted 10 months ago # -
Are 2nd hand CDs immoral? No royalties to artist, 1st owner will almost certainly have ripped the tracks before selling on.
Only differences to free downloads I can see is that 2nd hand sales have been around for as long as music, and there's a nominal cost (£2-3?). No difference to the artist.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/B00004WEMT/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&condition=used
Posted 10 months ago # -
Illegal downloading?
Shame! I be no one on here does that!
Posted 10 months ago # -
Maybe true that people do download illegally, but it's bit stupid to go public, no?
Posted 10 months ago # -
Are 2nd hand CDs immoral? No royalties to artist, 1st owner will almost certainly have ripped the tracks before selling on
That's different. One set of listening rights, one CD. The original owner can no longer listen.
When you make a copy, there are two CDs now but only one set of rights has been purchased.
I suspect the mods removed it because they don't want their forum used for discussing illegal behaviour as I expect they could get in big trouble for it theoretically. I think that as the site owners they are responsible for the content - because they are publishing it.
Posted 10 months ago # -
I think that as the site owners they are responsible for the content - because they are publishing it.
When a site is moderated then the site owners become responsible for the content. If you want to discuss anything illegal or immoral or libelous then the place to do it is an unmoderated forum.
Two wholly unmoderated forums I can suggest: The comments section of the Daily Star and the comments section of the Daily Express. Not that I'm suggesting anyone go and have fun.
Posted 10 months ago # -
Ah, I didn't know there was a difference in law been moderated and un-moderated - makes perfect sense though of course.
Posted 10 months ago # -
I suspect the mods removed it because they don't want their forum used for discussing illegal behaviour
I very much doubt that, I've seen illegal drugs and illegal number plates discussed on here.
Posted 10 months ago # -
Ah, I didn't know there was a difference in law been moderated and un-moderated - makes perfect sense though of course
There isn't. The publisher is responsible for the content.Posted 10 months ago # -
Discussing them is one thing, asking where to get them or can someone supply me is something else, because it's illegal. Talking about drugs is not.
Posted 10 months ago # -
And the publishers responsibility is limited. If something is brought to their attention and they remove it then they are not liable
Posted 10 months ago # -
But the main point here, which we are all missing is, would Jim Morrison really care?
Posted 10 months ago # -
But the main point here, which we are all missing is, would Jim Morrison really care?
yes, he would.
i remember him being very vocally opposed to napster when it first emerged, and he has also campaigned for ISPs to be forced to divulge personal details of file sharers to the courts etc.Posted 10 months ago # -
Napster must have been pretty freaked out by being haunted by Jim Morrison.
Posted 10 months ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
