Junkyard – Member
You said that the statement had no relation to the issue being discussed as you were
No, I said that the two paragraphs in my first post were not directly connected to each other. I made a point, then finished with a tale. You (and others) read them as ‘one’ and you continue to do so.
Repeating what I replied to aracer, I was not expressing any opinion on the ‘case’ I mentioned. I also clearly said that I was not using it as an example in support of my point about the Law and Morality.
It is a coincidence that happen to have a conversation this week with somebody about their experience with an Industrial Tribunal. Mentioning it on an informal thread about Industrial Tribunals in the Chat Forum of a Biking Website would seem a reasonable action to take. Indeed others have.
Again, I accept that the wording / arrangement or my first post wasn’t of the quality of Shakespear but this is an informal forum. But I have clarrified my posts. You continue to deny that I could have possibly meant anything else but your interpretation of my first post and perpetuate things.
You could just accept that you’ve;
1. read something
2. misunderstood it’s intention
3. commented on it
4. been told ‘no that’s not what was meant’
and leave it at that.
But you choose not to and return to repeat action number 3.
Pityful really.