Forum search & shortcuts

Dont call me Babe.
 

[Closed] Dont call me Babe.

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mountain chub - Member

People are dying in eastern europe due to severe cold conditions, people dying in third world with severe malnutrition - but someone innocently calls a woman 'love' on a bus and it's headline news

It was 'babe'.

A man saying 'Alright babe' to a woman has different connotations than 'Alright love'.

'Babe' to me is a term that references sexual attractiveness so I can see why some ladies may find in inappropiate. If I'm speaking to someone on the phone I'll use 'Sir' or 'Madam' and face to face I'm pretty sure I've never used 'love' 'babe' 'darling' etc to someone I don't know.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:44 pm
Posts: 17855
Full Member
 

Junkyard - Member

How on earth could it be called patronizing to implore you to take the views of females seriously?

I took the patronising comment to mean that it was patronising towards women to jump in and assume that they cannot fight their own corner, like a knight in shining armour.....rather than it being patronising to DS that he should consider the views of females and take them seriously.....

Is that clearer, Sweetie??


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:48 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

'Babe' to me is a term that references sexual attractiveness

So when elzorillo and philconsequence's elderly mother calls you babe, you think that means she is sexually attracted to you?

In fact she "calls everyone babe" apparently.

So I think you just called their elderly mother a slapper?

Is that right darling?


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm guessing "sugartits" would probably fall outside the bounds of acceptability.

I was once passed by a rider who shouted, "Elite rider passing on your right, sugar tits", but it was my husband, so I let it slide.

I dislike being called 'babe'. I don't have much of a problem with duck, chuck, pet, petal or me dear, because they all sound like they can be applied to both men and women equally, although I’d question their use by strangers or colleagues in formal circumstances.

It might be a regional thing, but for me using ‘babe’ as a term of endearment comes off as being a bit sleazy and sexualised. It makes me think of the Daily Star and Nuts magazine, and of convention Booth Babes. Booth ducks would be awesome though.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:54 pm
Posts: 17843
 

* sashays into thread *

Make my day guys - call me 'Babe'.

* waits excitedly *


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:55 pm
Posts: 17855
Full Member
 

Mrs Toast - Member

I was once passed by a rider who shouted, "Elite rider passing on your right, sugar tits", but it was my husband, so I let it slide.

He does that to everyone.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:56 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

using ‘babe’ as a term of endearment comes off as being a bit sleazy and sexualised

I'm getting more and more interested in meeting elzorillo and philconsequence's elderly mother. She must be a right go-er. 😀


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CG - you're a babe :mrgreen:

my mum is indeed a right go-er, once had a to break into a car after a cheeky meet up for outdoor rumpypumpy on top of a clif ended up with them locking the keys inside the car! 😆

but that's not the reason she calls people babe, its the same as me calling people dude... only ever intended as a friendly thing, nothing sexual. personally i think 'honey' has as many sexual connotations as 'babe' (high street honeys for example) and as a result its not a term i'd use when chatting to teh laydeez. but i wouldn't batter an eyelid if a lady called me honey or babe, despite knowing they probably want me willy, it'd be incredibly self-centered and up-myself to assume so.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GrahamS - Member

"'Babe' to me is a term that references sexual attractiveness"

So when elzorillo and philconsequence's elderly mother calls you babe, you think that means she is sexually attracted to you?

In fact she "calls everyone babe" apparently.

So I think you just called their elderly mother a slapper?

Is that right darling?

🙄


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 57405
Full Member
 

I'd love too CG, but apparently that'd be belittling you. I'm sorry, but I've just too much respect for you

Sorry 😳


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@cg:

Good afternoon Ms, Could I trouble you with a question regarding the number of those which you could obtain for the sum of one English pound, if I may make so bold?


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

stumpy01
I took the patronising comment to mean that it was patronising towards women to jump in and assume that they cannot fight their own corner, like a knight in shining armour..

That would be a bit patronising if thats what I had done. However its not what I did as is clear if you actually read the thread.

I think the views of the women posting on this thread say it all.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:00 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

I think the views of the women posting on this thread say it all.

cinnamon_girl - Member

* sashays into thread *

Make my day guys - call me 'Babe'.

Me too TJ, My Lord.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:02 pm
Posts: 57405
Full Member
 

Alright sweet cheeks. You're back then? Where's my brew?

*slaps TJ's arse*


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

*cops a feel*


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I took the patronising comment to mean that it was patronising towards women to jump in and assume that they cannot fight their own corner, like a knight in shining armour

+1. 😆
@ [url= http://www.ilovewavs.com/Effects/People/Sound%20Effect%20-%20Wolf%20Whistle.wav ]cg[/url] 😉
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:03 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

I resisted this thread till now.

It turned out exactly as I expected it too.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:03 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

@ stumpy i dont think he was assuming they could not fight their own corner it reads more like he is asking people to not ignore the views of women whilst saying it is not sexist.

Not convinced DS you just seem to be the new cynical -al to TJ posting tbh


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Junkyard - Member
@ stumpy i dont think he was assuming they could not fight their own corner it reads more like he is asking people to not ignore the views of women whilst saying it is not sexist.

just shows how people put their own context into the words of others 😀 and its all about context innit bredbin

i suggest most people on this thread are respectful people and wouldn't intentionally say something they thought might come across as sexist, or belittling to the opposite sex.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not convinced DS you just seem to be the new cynical -al to TJ posting tbh

Not so, sorry to disappoint, it probably looks that way in the absence of one or two larger than life characters who would otherwise be filling the void. One long thread yesterday and a reference to that today doesn't quite constitute an on going attack, does it?
And it was exactly about women fighting their own corners, next we'll be supporting positive discrimination. 😯
Isn't there something wrong where I can call emsz a "little lady" in the most patronizing of ways, she can tell me to piss off, we both have a laugh as it was sent a received without malice or bad intention and out of all that a third (male) party is affronted???


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i suggest most people on this thread are respectful people and wouldn't intentionally say something they thought might come across as sexist, or belittling to the opposite sex.

and nor would most recipients take it like that either
There will however, be some ready to step up to the mark and take offence on their behalf, whether they want it or not


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oops CG and Mrs Toast ruin TJ's desperate attempt to monopolise ethical purity.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:10 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Purrs ... and then purrs some more.

Thanks chaps. 🙂


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:18 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Thanks chaps

SEXIST!

😉


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:19 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

i suggest most people on this thread are respectful people and wouldn't intentionally say something they thought might come across as sexist, or belittling to the opposite sex.
now that is patronising and misguided


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mcboo - Member
Oops CG and Mrs Toast ruin TJ's desperate attempt to monopolise ethical purity.

Really?

Mrs Toast - Member
[b]I dislike being called 'babe'[/b]. I don't have much of a problem with duck, chuck, pet, petal or me dear, because they all sound like they can be applied to both men and women equally, although I’d question their use by strangers or colleagues in formal circumstances.

[b]It might be a regional thing, but for me using ‘babe’ as a term of endearment comes off as being a bit sleazy and sexualised.[/b] It makes me think of the Daily Star and Nuts magazine, and of convention Booth Babes. Booth ducks would be awesome though.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:26 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20136
Full Member
 

[i]Make my day guys - call me 'Babe'.[/i]

You wish love 🙂


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lifer got in there before I did.
It is pathetic how you're all after TJ again. All he said is to read the women's posts on here (and apart from CG all resent some or all of those terms in one way or another!) but you make out he is all wrong to ask you to do this when you clearly haven't read them.
Do you guys really don't mind if blokes call your gf/wife 'babe' ? Any sleezy old git ? any chav ? Or your pal from the cycle club ?? REALLY ??


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:31 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

Do you guys really don't mind if blokes call your gf/wife 'babe' ? Any sleezy old git ? any chav ? Or your pal from the cycle club ?? REALLY ??

This "context" concept is quite a difficult one to grasp, isn't it?


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, fill me in, mogrim, I haven't got time to read all 8 pages .... guess you mean it depends who says it ? If you had read my first post I said I dislike to be called this by strangers. Context enough for you ?


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Lovely" seems to be the common term of address in S Wales.

Normally female to female or female to male...

Took a liitle while to get used to being called lovely by randon women


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, [i]fill me in[/i], mogrim 😆

Steady...


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh Crikey, jsut get your coat, will you! I was hesitating when I typed this and thought 'they can't possibly....' - but you proved me wrong !! So classy 😉


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:41 pm
Posts: 17843
 

* flutters eyelashes at phil, binners, crikey, IHN *

They're eating out of my hand. 😉


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Oh Crikey, [b]jsut get your coat[/b], will you[/i]

...why, are you taking me home? 😆

Sorry, having a bit of a Peter Kay moment..


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:43 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20136
Full Member
 

[i]They're eating out of my hand.[/i]

Nah, we just know you're easy 🙂


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Crikey, not before you show me a photo of you, babe 😆


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

Well, fill me in, mogrim, I haven't got time to read all 8 pages .... guess you mean it depends who says it ? If you had read my first post I said I dislike to be called this by strangers. Context enough for you ?

I couldn't care less if some 65 year old tells my wife she looks fantastic today - and I know for a fact that she's often quite chuffed when it happens. Another thing altogether would be a 25 year old guy at work saying the same thing to her on a daily basis. Context, see?


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...and there's an example of overtly sexualised communication, but in a context where it isn't seen as threatening or demeaning.

Context...


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:46 pm
Posts: 57405
Full Member
 

*swoons at CG in a respectful, non-sexist way*


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:46 pm
Posts: 78536
Full Member
 

Well, fill me in, mogrim, I haven't got time to read all 8 pages .... guess you mean it depends who says it

Not just who says it. Here's a couple of posts I wrote earlier which explains what you've missed:

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/dont-call-me-babe/page/7#post-3446402

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/life-is-all-about-taking-risks/page/4#post-3446556

Who says it, how they say it, meaning, intent.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:47 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Do you guys really don't mind if blokes call your gf/wife 'babe' ?

Context.

If a bus driver said to her, as per the OP, [i]"That'll be two pound ten please babe"[/i] then I would think absolutely nothing of it. And she'd be quite happy to be called babe.

Would you really be offended if a female bus driver (or phil's elderly mum) called your husband/partner "babe" in the same context?


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:47 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

*Looks askance at C_G.*


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 17843
 

*Looks askance at C_G.*

Cap'n, I really am classy.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:51 pm
Posts: 78536
Full Member
 

If a bus driver said to her, as per the OP, "That'll be two pound ten please babe" then I would think absolutely nothing of it. And she'd be quite happy to be called babe.

Likewise. And I think I've just spotted what might be causing the disparity. Compare,

"That'll be two pound ten please babe"

"That'll be two pound ten please, babe"

The first, a throwaway friendly term. The second, the emphasis moves, he's making a point of calling her a babe.


 
Posted : 01/02/2012 4:53 pm
Page 7 / 8