A few weeks ago Mrs PP was drinking a bottle of Peroni. In after the last mouthful, she pulled this out of her mouth: (Luckily...)
IMG_0899 - Copy by PeterPoddy, on Flickr
Which when blown up as far as it will go looks like this:
IMG_0899 by PeterPoddy, on Flickr
Before I go any further with this tale, would anyone like to guess what it is? (This is not a trick question)
Is it a piece of emerald and should you not be counting yourselves very lucky to have the good fortune to find it in your bottle of beer?
looks pretty obvious really. it's a bit of the bottle
Glass?
It's part of a false eye?
Should'nt be opening the bottle with her teeth should she?
Kryptonite
If I say a bit of glass from the bottle, is it going to set off a claxon like on QI?
is it a piece of Ganymede, the 7th moon of Jupiter. £200000000000000 per kilo.
Thankyou John. Exactly what we thought.
We checked the bottle carefully and couldn't see or feel any chips round the neck, so we contacted Peroni and sent the chip, the bottle and the packaging back.
Yesterday we got a letter which said (I quote)
"After conducting numerous tests on the sample, the Quality Team found that the foreign body within the beer was in fact organic material (mould) and not a piece of glass"
Hence the title of this thread.
I held it in my hand. It was sharp, it was clear, it was hard.
We thought she might have chipped the neck on opening the bottle (Which would be hard) but she hadn't, not as far as we could feel inside or round the rim of the neck of the bottle.
Looks like a 3 and a bit mm shard of glass to me. I couldn't measure it properly until I got back to work on Monday though.
so we contacted Peroni and sent the chip, the bottle and the packaging back.
I can't help feeling that you are flogging this for all it's worth, in the hope of some kind of compensation perhaps?
It was probably a piece of glass, from a glass bottle of beer, from a place where beer is bottled, that ultimately caused no harm.
yes, i think they do. ask for the sample back so you can get a second opinion, see if they have lost it...
is it a piece of mould from Ganymede, the 7th moon of Jupiter. £.500000000000000 per kilo.
And mould in a bottle of water is okay, is it?
I can't help feeling that you are flogging this for all it's worth, in the hope of some kind of compensation perhaps?
No, I'm asking a question on an internet forum. We already have 'compenstation'.
I'm trying to present the facts as simply as possible. The thread title was necessarily OTT to drag in some 'viewers'. You are very wide of the mark. 
I read a story recently about a serial complainer. You know the type.
Returned a burnt cornflake with a snotty letter to Kelloggs demanding compensation. Apparently they were sent back a single cornflake sellotaped to a letter.
As for the bottle, who cares. No one got hurt.
Well thanks for sharing, most interesting. 
As for the bottle, who cares. No one got hurt.
Well, yes indeed, Mrs PP didn't get hurt. Thanks for pointing that out.
We both, however, think they are taking the mick. Just a bit.
I think we should boycott Peroni until they admit liability! on second thought I have just bought a 6 pack and I am quite gasping at the moment so it will have to wait.
And mould in a bottle of water* is okay, is it?
I don't think anyone, least of all, Peter is saying that. The main point of this thread, is, erm, what is the point of this thread?
* this is beer though, isn't it? Unless Peroni does water too?
I don't think anyone, least of all, Peter is saying that
What I meant was it seems as though Peroni is saying 'oh it's okay it was only mould' which is still bad and you should still expect some compensation. Water can't go mouldy, which means there was some foreign object in there for sure.
However it's definitely glass, so they are clearly rambling.
Perhaps they'd been drinking when they replied?
what is the point of this thread?* this is beer though, isn't it? Unless Peroni does water too?
Same as any thread: Have a chinwag about something that's happened, and to see what everyone's opinion is, whilst dodging questions about motives and 'compenstation' which really isn't the point
And yes, it was beer.
Ah, okay, yes then, they clearly do think you're dumb. Or, see my previous post, they were steaming drunk when they replied to you. I like the idea that Peroni's customer service team is fully committed to the product
Anyway, I don't think they know I have pics with such detail. Mrs PP is dealing with them and I think she's going to be firing off an email in the morning... Could get interesting.
The 'sample' was apparently sent to Italy.
I'm guessing PP would have been happy with "very sorry Mr Poddy, it does appear to be a fragment of glass from our production facility. Please accept out apologies, we are please to hear your good lady wife was unharmed"
They are out of order (or I need to learn a lot more about mould!)
Its not like you know anyone who works in the beverage industry who could explain why broken glass can get in an unbroken bottle . . .
Very high speed bottling lines that run at 1000 bpm +
If the capper is not exactly in line the bottle which is slightly off center will explode in a fairly spectacular manner .
The bottling line should come to a complete stop and all surrounding bottles be destroyed and the line cleaned down before a restart.
There is a very high chance that a missed cap has exploded a bottle downstream and a shard has flown a few meters up the line and into the bottle that you got .
We both, however, think they are taking the mick. Just a bit.
Aye, right enough. Thing is you'll never get Peroni to admit that what you sent them was a piece of glass. Mould is probably what every single foreign body is (whether it is or not) this is for several good reasons.
1. they don't know that you're not a journalist, and tomorrow "Peroni beer in lethal glass shocker" isn't going to be splashed all over the front page of the Sun
2. they have no way of telling whether what you sent them and the story you've told them are in any way connected (I'm not doubting the veracity of your story), but I'll bet they get all sorts of chancers
3. Admitting that sort of foreign object in a bottle of their product would open them up to the possibility of litigation. Hence the standard first line defence of: Mould.
4. there's more, but I'm bored.
If it bothers you get a solicitor to fire off a strongly worded letter. However Peroni can afford a better lawyer. You know, they know, move on. Bet you 50p some production manager is getting an extra arsehole ripped
I'm very glad MrsPP didn't swallow the bit of glass but, out of curiosity, what would happen if a person had swallowed a shard of glass of that size? Would it cause serious damage or just pass through?
Ah, okay, yes then, they clearly do think you're dumb.
As I thought! Ha Ha!
You know what it's like, you're 110% sure of something, then someone questions it, and all of a sudden you begin to doubt yourself.
I was just sitting cropping the pics ready for Mrs PP to email and I thought I'd post it here. They'd been sitting on the camera for a few weeks and, well, I might not have remembered it correctly. Then I crop the pics, and yeah, on second look I reckon they think we're stupid.
In my experience 'customer service' departments are a shield for companies, and their whole purpose is not to welcome customers' feedback, but to deflect and deter people. It's as if they've had your money, and see no point in dealing with you further.
While I share your concerns, why on earth were you drinking Peroni in the first place? Presumably they added the glass chip when they removed the flavour - no?
This topic has been closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
