Does that mean the tattoo guy had to spread her “cheeks” when doing all those inking? I mean c’mon you have to spread the cheeks to do the inner sides of her cheeks. He would have full view of her …
I’m sure she’ll be very proud of it when she’s old, saggy and grey. Either that or she’s going to spend a shed load having her arse lasered in middle age..,
The irony with the article in the Huffington post is the fact that this in accompanied with a series of photos titled, “SC’s style evolution.” An interesting take on evolution?
Weird not to have an opinion on someone else’s bum? Bit weird.
An attractive lady gets a very pretty tattoo on her rear, but you you’d rather comment up on my tasteless tone-lowering attempted funny? You a Village People fan?
Ah the typical post of “think what it would be like when he/she/you is old, what will people say!”
With tattoo I always feel that those people are stuck in time and have not moved on even when they are old.
Doesn’t feel right to me unless you are a head hunter (not the office sort) or traditional tribal people. Where I used to be the head hunters have it all over them which to us are normal, however, the head hunter without any is weird.