Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Chainkeepers vs chainguides
  • mtbfix
    Full Member

    So the 1×9 has been happily trundling about with a front mech acting as a chainguide. It works but ain’t pretty. Superstar have their XCR chainguide and a chainkeeper a bit like the Paul’s one. What is the consensus as to which is best for general XC-ness?

    Rickos
    Free Member

    Depends if you find you drop the chain from the bottom when you do that back pedal to drop the outside foot for a corner or not. If you’ve been OK with the mech, then just a top guide will probably be OK.

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    E13 xcx has been perfect on my five. Not dropped the chain once and I’ve tried pretty hard.

    mtbfix
    Full Member

    Not dropped off the bottom of the rings. Oxfordshire offers little in the way of lumpy corner entry likely to cause such an event.

    faaz
    Free Member

    The superstar is decent for general XC. I tried my 1×9 setup without any guide and it was bad, kept falling. But now got a superstar and e.13 guide mixed together to form a downtube mounted guide which works a treat.

    Falls off still in big hits and fall offs etc, but that’s to be expected.

    takisawa2
    Full Member

    The Superstar XCR one works fine on my 1×10. I’ve been using the bb mount one.
    I ordered one of the new seat-tube mounted ones, but on opening the packet today its already broken. There is a really fragile little bit on the hinge. Might just keep the BB mount one.

    mtbfix
    Full Member

    Whichever way we go it’ll have to be ST mounted. 73mm BB shell restrictions…

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    mtbfix – Member
    Whichever way we go it’ll have to be ST mounted. 73mm BB shell restrictions…

    Eh? They work fine on 73 bbs

    buzz-lightyear
    Free Member

    If you plan to use a top-only chain guide, I recommend you make the chain as short as practical. This solved my de-chaining problems.

    kayak23
    Full Member

    Falls off still in big hits and fall offs etc, but that’s to be expected.

    If it doesn’t always keep it on, maybe it needs looking at. A big hit is the last place you want to drop a chain.

    onandon
    Free Member

    The superstar BB mounted one is good but the seatpost version is total pap.
    I used mine (setpost verion) for one ride before I modded it and they chucked it away.

    mtbfix
    Full Member

    Eh? They work fine on 73 bbs

    I’d assumed that a 73mm shell with no spacers would mean that fitting a BB mount device would be out of the question. Was I wrong?

    getonyourbike
    Free Member

    Eh? They work fine on 73 bbs

    I’d assumed that a 73mm shell with no spacers would mean that fitting a BB mount device would be out of the question. Was I wrong? Yes, you’re most definitely wrong:
    68mm BB shell- 3 spacers, 2 driveside, 1 non-driveside
    73mm BB shell- 1 spacer, 1 driveside

    mtbfix
    Full Member

    I stand as a man in orthapaedic shoes, corrected.

    faaz
    Free Member

    Falls off still in big hits and fall offs etc, but that’s to be expected.

    If it doesn’t always keep it on, maybe it needs looking at. A big hit is the last place you want to drop a chain.

    Mmm I run chain quite loose not baggy but only just tight on smallest ring. Maybe need to lose a couple of links. When I said big drops I meant big falls, just worded it badly. Came off other day and it fell off and then it’s quite hard to get back on as the guide is so close to the chainring.

    mtbfix
    Full Member

    Having checked this afternoon my BB has no spacers.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

The topic ‘Chainkeepers vs chainguides’ is closed to new replies.