I wouldn’t say no, I’d go and probably have a bit of a riot, if any of the gay parties I’ve been to over the years are anything to go by.
However, I’d feel a bit bitter, my Mrs and I couldn’t marry in a church, she catholic, me divorcee, we accepted it and got on with life, as things worked out she lost her faith eventually.
We also lived through the period when marriage meant less and less an at the end of the day who gave a damn wether you were married or not. So kind of fail to see why ‘they’ necessarily need the endorsement, given i assume that the civil partnership deal gives the same rights as we got at the registry office.
I see it as gay hubris, just wanting to rub the noses of the right or church goers in it, in much the same way as the lefties rubbed the right wings noses in the immigration and multicultural pc bullshit. Truth is, these days, other than the primitives, radical islamists etc, nobody gives a toss what your sexuality is, and personally i think it’s pathetic that we constantly find we have to define ourselves by it.
That Question Time last night, in Brighton ffs having that debate, why? Are they deliberately trying to inflame opinion against it? Cameron? It was just political opportunism, was it necessary? I don’t really think so, most of the gay folk I know just roll their eyes, and get on with life.
It’s just bollox, who really even cares?