I’m just saying if it’s looked at objectively, the situation would suggest that whilst everyone was in a NON emotional state, they decided the best option [financially] was to transfer assets out early enough not to get hit with costs later on.
Is Mum fully sound of mind, if not then the previous agreement could have been drawn up to address this issue! Don’t get me wrong, there is always a moral compass that you should look at, but often these agreements are made so as not to affect family later in life – i.e. i don;t want my kids to worry about me when i’m old, take me out to meadow and pull the trigger..
The bloke may well be a tool, but is he just not upholding a promise he made to his mum, irrespective of how it’s coming across?