All down to consultation I am afraid. When planners are consulted from the beginning, projects tend to tun a lot smoother.
When planners stop hiding behind the phrase ‘This advice is given without prejudice’, stop changing their minds (for whatever reason), read their own local/unitary plans, and get at least a rudimentary understanding of Listed Building Legislation, it might be worth taking that seriously.
The fact is, architects need planners more than we need architects.
Is that council policy? I’ll show that quote to the next client I have to explain a planning related delay to.
TJ sounds like he made a right mess. At least in theory north and south of the border Listed Building protection extends to the whole building. Messing up on this is a criminal offence so unfortunately his indemnity insurance may insist the architect pays this element of your claim should it come to that.
Like others have said in all professions there are good and bad practitioners.