does this mean the death of the 135mm QR ? just bought a new frame 
or can you convert to this new standard ? also would xc and trail bikes need it i'm really not sure !
Bike Forum
[closed]
142mm standard
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
yes, your whole bike is now obsolete, you'll not be able to ride it after 31st December 2010
Posted 1 year ago # -
Lets hope it dies along with tapered headtubes and BB30. Just the industry's way of getting you to spend more.
Posted 1 year ago # -
142mm Spacing explained, I'd never even heard of it pre this thread
Posted 1 year ago # -
I think that you'll be ok!
It's probably only gonna start appearing on DH and AM bikes, I think there's all kinds of "standards" that do nothing for us but if you've ever tried to get a bolt thru axle into a rear wheel you'll probably appreciate the syntace approach!
Posted 1 year ago # -
Posted 1 year ago # -
It's probably only gonna start appearing on DH and AM bikes
So not on, say, 2011 S-Works Epic such as was announced today?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Nearly as wide as Tandem spacing then
Posted 1 year ago # -
thanks guys I only have 9mm QR on me hardtail so I dont think I could convert as you cant chang the drop outs but i'm not that bothered ...:(
Posted 1 year ago # -
Edric 64 - Member
Nearly as wide as Tandem spacing then
So it begs the question why not use tandem spacing?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Jeez sorry Dougal- I don't get the chance to trawl the internet all day- but bike radar (where I assume you read it) state that is currently unique among xc bikes- so before that announcement was made I would have stuck by what I said!
Posted 1 year ago # -
It will make it easier for belt drive. Large front rings need to be spaced out beyond the limits of the cassette on a 135mm OLD.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Spend more how exactly bigbugsbaws? Either your new bike will come with it or it wont! They're aren't many 'frame only' bikes with this standard AFAIK.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I understood the spacing to be the same as 135mm, but with the added part sitting in the frame to allow easier fitment of wheels, like on bolt through forks.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Thats right Badgerpoo. There is an extra 3.5mm each side that allows the hub to sit in a ledge in the drop-outs on each side. So far this standard seems to be on complete bikes so compatibility isn't really an issue.
Posted 1 year ago # -
So it begs the question why not use tandem spacing?
My thought as well ,why complicate things?
Posted 1 year ago # -
It's nearly July and therefore time for another standard.
Posted 1 year ago # -
WTF is the point?
As if it will make any difference to stiffness.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Are tandem components suitable for MTB's?
Posted 1 year ago # -
My mtb tandem seems fine and the hope biguns I had were great but bloody heavy
Posted 1 year ago # -
STW eurobike article 2009 :
Posted 1 year ago # -
nickegg - Member
Are tandem components suitable for MTB's?
yep...alaskan bike manufacturers have been using hadley and phil wood tandam hubs for snow bikes for a few years...speedway cycles now do there own cheaper hubs...165mm rear(5mm spacers on 160mm hubs) 135mm front...
also phil wood 100mm BBs...my surly has one,some tandams used these wider BBs..Posted 1 year ago # -
165mm!! Even DH bikes only use 150mm. The point of the 142 standard is that the actual spacing between the drop outs is still 135mm. The extra width is in the hub end caps.
Posted 1 year ago # -
So not on, say, 2011 S-Works Epic such as was announced today?
Apparently that's 142mm but not compatible with other 142mm hubs.
Andy
Posted 1 year ago # -
i guess the issue is more with hub compatability. I would think that any hub that is compatible with 135 x 12mm should be easily convertible to 142 x 12 mm. I have a Yeti ASR-5 with a set of Crossmax SX's, the rear hub comes with both 9mm and 135 x 12 mm setup and I have bought a 135 x 12 mm conversion kit. It certainly makes a very stiff rear wheel attachment.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Any hub that can take a 12mm axle should be able to have the end caps swapped for longer ones. Hope I think already do some for Pro2s.
It sort of makes sense, as trying to get the back wheel in on a bolt through rear end is a bit of a PITA, as there's no way of locating the wheel in the frame. This addresses that problem.
Posted 1 year ago # -
WTF is the point?
As if it will make any difference to stiffness.
You seriously think a 12mm axle does not make a difference to QR? I can feel quite a difference with a 10/135 thru axle, I figure the main reason for this standard over existing 10/12mm axles is how easy it is to mount a wheel (so maybe this might actually end up being used)..
Hopefully we'll soon see the end of QR on proper bikes.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Any hub that can take a 12mm axle should be able to have the end caps swapped for longer ones. Hope I think already do some for Pro2s.
Hope, DT, I9 already have adapters. I expect King / Hadley will follow shortly. So really well enough thought out that nobody with a proper wheelset should have to end up with more then a £15 bill for the new end caps (ok, some might require a different axle).
Posted 1 year ago # -
[qupote]Hopefully we'll soon see the end of QR on proper bikes.
[/quote]Quest que le f***? If you'll pardon my french.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Hopefully we'll soon see the end of QR on
properturbomince bikesPosted 1 year ago # -
>WTF is the point?<
The point is explained fully here:
Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
