Viewing 40 posts - 121 through 160 (of 176 total)
  • Who would buy a gun then?
  • Zulu-Eleven
    Free Member

    Interesting lack of corellation between strictness of firearm laws and number of firearms homicides in the states.

    States like Utah, with notoriously lax firearms rules, have a much lower level of firearm homicide than states like New York, with much stricter rules.

    Same applies to differentials between Canada/US/Switzerland

    Indeed notorious leftie Micheal Moore pointed out some very good points about the social differences that feed these problems in Bowling for Columbine.

    batfink
    Free Member

    States like Utah, with notoriously lax firearms rules, have a much lower level of firearm homicide than states like New York, with much stricter rules.

    yeah I agree…. it’s not all ALL about firearms laws, but having guns and ammo readily available (or not) must be a factor in gun related deaths. In the absence of any coherent plan to deal with whatever it is that compells certain people go on a killing sprees – it would probably be more effective to take machine guns out of their hands.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    GrahamS – my mother’s perception of motorbike safety is not based on accident stats.

    Yeah, but unless you were in a particularly unusual area, her perception does seem to accurately reflect the reality that motorcycle riders are considerably more at risk.

    Gun and gun crime carry a very high “emotional response”

    Agreed.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    States like Utah, with notoriously lax firearms rules, have a much lower level of firearm homicide than states like New York, with much stricter rules.

    But there’s only 3 people in Utah and they’re all cousins or something?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    States like Utah, with notoriously lax firearms rules, have a much lower level of firearm homicide than states like New York, with much stricter rules.

    By what measure though? In total? Per capita? As a % of all homicides in that state?

    (As I understand it) New York is a very busy place – high population, high stress, gang culture, high homicide rate generally. Utah seems a lot more spaced out (in more ways than one).

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Well apply a bit of thought. A large amount of gun crime is gang related, which is a big city phenomenon. If you start breaking the statistics down there is a huge sociological back story.

    br
    Free Member

    A friends’ wife asked what I thought of her husband getting a pistol (when you could still have them), as she was worried that someone might break in and then shoot them. I said that a far higher risk was that her or my friend would shoot one-another…

    But I’m pretty ambiguous on guns, and when you look at Switzerland vs USA you realise its not about guns, but the whole culture.

    We’ve a number of air guns which the kids use (we live in the country and have a big enough garden too). They’ve all been taught how to use them correctly, just as I was.

    loum
    Free Member

    FFS, right allow me restate my original sentence then…
    I think From my personal interpretation of the sentiments being expressed in this thread, everyone (so far) appears to agrees that it would be a “bad thing” to have relaxed gun laws (like the States)
    Happy?

    Ok, I’ll repeat too: it’s not the question asked.
    I was quite interested in this original hypothetical debate: If the laws changed, who would buy a gun then?
    So I’d deliberately avoided expressing opinion on the US/UK gun laws, and most other posts appeared to avoid it too.
    It was a fresh idea and a little different to the usual gun law debate that crops up on here every few weeks with the usual suspects repeating the same points.
    But hijacks happen, with or without guns. 😉

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Just read all through this, and to answer the first question, would I own a gun, if the legal situation allowed?
    Yes, I would, probably a handgun or two, revolver and auto, just for the different way they work, and probably a semi-auto rifle, like the AR-15 shown earlier.
    Carry them? No; use them on ranges, yes, absolutely! Target shooting accurately with a powerful handgun is a tricky, challenging thing, unlike a rifle, where you can lie prone and support the weapon.

    An interesting question might be, who currently carries a knife?

    Nobody else has answered, so I will; I do, every day, and have done since I was at school. Even used to regularly carry sheath knives with never a problem, and had a pen knife in my pocket at school from age nine or ten, so we’re talking nearly fifty years carrying one.
    I’m sure a few here will have issues with that, to which my answer will be, ‘tough, deal with it’.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Ok, I’ll repeat too: it’s not the question asked.

    Good grief!

    I was unaware that we were forbidden from inferring opinions from the answers proffered. Clearly the forum would be greatly improved if this thread was just 129 posts of people voting “Yes” or “No” to the question. 🙄

    Very well. Shall we ask that question then?

    Does anyone think that the UK would benefit from adopting US-style gun laws?

    where you can legally carry weapons in public and one man can legally purchase two Glocks, a pump action shotgun, an assault rifle, 6,000 rounds of ammunition (and bulletproof vest & leggings, kevlar helmet and gasmask) within 60 days and not arouse any suspicion.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/how-gun-control-laws-might-have-saved-lives-colorado

    Zulu-Eleven
    Free Member

    By what measure though? In total? Per capita? As a % of all homicides in that state?

    Per Capita: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/10/gun-crime-us-state

    (As I understand it) New York is a very busy place – high population, high stress, gang culture, high homicide rate generally. Utah seems a lot more spaced out (in more ways than one).

    Which again supports the theory that its nothing to do with firearm laws, but other social issues.

    Well apply a bit of thought. A large amount of gun crime is gang related, which is a big city phenomenon. If you start breaking the statistics down there is a huge sociological back story.

    Ditto.

    batfink
    Free Member

    Which again supports the theory that its nothing to do with firearm laws, but other social issues.

    no it doesn’t…. it just means that there are ALSO other factors at work.

    yunki
    Free Member

    who’s sellin’ some guns then..?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Which again supports the theory that its nothing to do with firearm laws, but other social issues.

    No it doesn’t. It supports the theory that a state with less murders has less murders committed with guns than a state that has more murders.

    If they gave it as % of homicides involving firearms I’d be a lot more convinced.

    chewkw
    Free Member

    Hello! If the streets are infested by zombies who are going to alien probe me … these:

    1. Benelli M4.
    2. Glock 19 & 23 or Colt 1911 for being classic.
    3. AK-47 & M16 purely for being classic.
    4. Mini Uzi
    5. Colt 9mm SMG
    6. MP5 or MP7
    7. UPM45
    8. FN FAL
    9. M21 or M24 for being classic
    10. L115 just like the look of it.
    11. Barrett M95 or 99 or 107 or XM500 … probably XM500 (these are the bad boys)
    12. M110 (looks like proper gun)
    13. AS-50 (hhhmmm … a bit like Barrett)

    :mrgreen:

    professor_fate
    Free Member

    Firing weapons is a real buzz, albeit a short-lived one. The main reason to carry one is self-defence i suppose, although i reckon the real reason is to impress/intimidate others… I struggle to think of an occasion when such an item would’ve actually been useful so a pointless exercise? If i wanted to artificially inflate my self-esteem i’d probably buy some Fox 40’s 😀
    But i’d recommend blatting off a few rounds in a controlled environment – what a rush!

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    What benefit is there in owning an uzi?

    Killing chavs? Overthrowing the political classes?

    I bet there’s hundreds of benefits!

    professor_fate
    Free Member

    I liked these…

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    No it doesn’t. It supports the theory that a state with less murders has less murders committed with guns than a state that has more murders.

    I’m not convinced by your argument.

    The Canadians own as many guns per person as the Americans, however Canada has a low firearm crime rate.

    Also the States in the US that have concealed carry laws have lower rates of rape, assault, armed robbery etc etc.

    Even Michael Moore doesn’t think guns are the real problem, it’s Americans, in particular the American psyche.

    Discuss.

    misterfrostie
    Free Member

    Meh, who needs loads of guns. I’d be quite happy with a Colt M4 with the grenade tube. Miss with a shell or there’s more than one of the thieving scrotes trying to nick your bikes and pop one out the tube at them.

    chewkw
    Free Member

    misterfrostie – Member

    Meh, who needs loads of guns. I’d be quite happy with a Colt M4 with the grenade tube. Miss with a shell or there’s more than one of the thieving scrotes trying to nick your bikes and pop one out the tube at them.

    Why you … you are using brute force aren’t you with that grenade tube. Zombies need head shot not blow them to pieces … 🙄

    chewkw
    Free Member

    double post … 🙄

    bwaarp
    Free Member

    Also 40mm grenades are lethal over quite a distance, launch one of those to kill a bike thief and your going to ruin your entire garage.

    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    And yet there are still many who are afraid of flying

    Probably they are the ones that CAN read and interpret data correctly.

    Flying is one of the most dangerous methods of travel (when compared journey for journey). When comparing one return holiday flight per year against a daily commute, of course that changes to being safest, but in reality it isn’t.

    br
    Free Member

    So two ways to look at this:

    1 Folk are worried and think that if they’d had a gun they’d have shot the lunatic

    2 At least one more lunatic has bought a load of guns…

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18980974

    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    Guns do not exist for peaceful reasons. At least, not handguns of the kind you can coneal, which is what this is really about. They are only for shooting people, or threatening to shoot people.

    Uneducated bilge.

    There are competitions specially for such weapons, even in the UK until handguns went Section 5.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    The Canadians own as many guns per person as the Americans, however Canada has a low firearm crime rate.

    Oh I agree that there is a cultural/sociological factor. But I don’t think that the figures that Zulu-Eleven offered showed that.

    As for Canada, more people may have guns, but what are their laws on concealed carry, home defence and lethal force?

    Also the States in the US that have concealed carry laws have lower rates of rape, assault, armed robbery etc etc.

    According to wiki, 49 states have concealed carry, so saying they have lower rates than the one remaining state (Illinois) is not exactly a great sample size! (also I don’t believe it is true – show me figures not NRA hearsay)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concealed_carry_in_the_United_States

    beefheart
    Free Member

    I would totally buy guns.
    Target shooting or whatever- shooting guns is a lot of fun.
    In my experience, the bigger the gun, the more fun it is.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    I wouldn’t buy guns, per se.

    I inherited mine! 🙂

    molgrips
    Free Member

    George Zimmerman, that’s his name.

    I was discussing gun laws with my FiL when we were over last. In Florida they now have a law known as ‘Stand your Ground’. It means that if you feel threatened, you are not obliged to try and escape the situation like you are in the rest of the country; you can shoot the threatening person instead. You don’t have to be on your property, it could be anyone you think is being threatening.

    😯

    The law’s critics argue that Florida’s law makes it very difficult to prosecute cases against people who shoot others and then claim self-defense. The shooter can argue they felt threatened, and in most cases, the only witness who could have argued otherwise is the victim who was shot and killed.[40] Before passage of the law, Miami police chief John F. Timoney called the law unnecessary and dangerous in that “[w]hether it’s trick-or-treaters or kids playing in the yard of someone who doesn’t want them there or some drunk guy stumbling into the wrong house, you’re encouraging people to possibly use deadly physical force where it shouldn’t be used.”

    This is ONLY an issue when you have ordinary people wandering around packing heat.

    Fudd
    Free Member

    Remember kids, guns don’t kill people, rappers do 😉

    And you knows it 😆

    Rusty-Shackleford
    Free Member

    Love this site :mrgreen:

    FPS Russia

    mattbee
    Full Member

    I operate 4 lagre and busy airsoft sites and play for a hobby. We run anything from stag do type couple of hours running around paintball style stuff all the way to military simulation games involving the use of helicopters, military vehicles, boats etc. We’ve even done ‘anti piracy’ stuff on boats in the channel, assaulting from RIBs into other vessels. I also enjoy hunting rabbits with an air rifle and have shot a fair few different weapon systems in the past.

    I don’t think I’d be bothered about owning a currently Sec 5 firearm though, except possibly a ‘race gun’ type of pistol for ISPCC style competition, although that actually works really well with airsoft replicas. Anything else, whilst I can appreciate the fun of shooting it I don’t think I’d want the responsibility of owning. I’ll stick with my toys and the occasional range day to play with other stuff I think.

    grum
    Free Member

    Love this site

    FPS Russia

    You do realise the bloke isn’t actually Russian.

    irc
    Full Member

    @TuckerUK

    Flying is one of the most dangerous methods of travel (when compared journey for journey). When comparing one return holiday flight per year against a daily commute, of course that changes to being safest, but in reality it isn’t.

    Really? British airlines have had zero fatalities in the last 10 years. How many road deaths have there been in that time?

    UK 10 year fatality rates per billion passenger km.

    UK Airlines – zero
    Rail 0.2
    Bus and coach 0.3
    Car 2.4
    Motorcycles 104

    UK Parliament Briefing Paper

    derek_starship
    Free Member

    I think Paige from Gunsmoke could persuade me to put my hand in my pocket…

    chewkw
    Free Member

    derek_starship – Member

    I think Paige from Gunsmoke could persuade me to put my hand in my pocket…

    Ya baby …

    I really do not see any problem with people shooting people, self culling, but I really object to poachers hunting illegally. So shooting poachers should be a game i.e. hunting game, and who knows this will turn into real hunting business.

    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    Further on from my earlier comments regarding just the gun not being enough and massive and regular training is also required, it doesn’t end there. It starts being a whole way of life, you choose clothes based on how accessible your gun is or how easy and unrestricted movement is, vehicles are chosen for their tactical value, you chose certain seats in restaurants (and movie theatres)…

    In the early ’80s I used to take a US shooting monthly that had a regular ‘shoot-out de-constructed’ column. Informative, eye-opening, and also pretty scary. I’ve also been a long time fan of defensive firearms gurus Massad Ayoob and Jeff Cooper (amongst others). It quickly became apparent just how the firearm itself was just one small part of a whole larger program, indeed, even a whole ethos.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    I think Paige from Gunsmoke could persuade me to put my hand in my pocket…

    Is she part-giraffe?

    I think the fact that her neck is almost as long as her head suggest that photo may have been shopped just a little bit 😀

    stewartc
    Free Member

    +1 Grahams

Viewing 40 posts - 121 through 160 (of 176 total)

The topic ‘Who would buy a gun then?’ is closed to new replies.