Got to say I’m getting fed up with the preciousness of the ‘not attacking the yellow’ unwritten rule.
I see it like this:
1) Froome’s issue was apparently with his front mech, reminded me of Schleck vs. Contador.
2) To me this says either poor technique from Froome (shifting under power or an acceleration?). Probably unlikely though. So what? Poor set up by the mechanic of probably the biggest and most well funded team in the race? Or just poor equipment choice, those ovoid rings that Froome chooses to run can’t help the front shifting, perhaps he could ‘choose’ to do away with the advantage they give him in order to guarantee better shifting?
3) In the era of race radio and riding to power meters, is it really what the race needs to ‘neutralise’ any attack which is deemed to have been launched at a ‘dishonourable’ time when the leader of the biggest and most well funded team in the race is momentarily inconvenienced?
I shared Aru’s frustration when the other guys pulled it back. I’m sure the guys who used to ‘tour’ France whilst repairing their own bikes in the local smithies workshop would have an opinion too 8)