• This topic has 145 replies, 66 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by hora.
Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 146 total)
  • Parental priority over booking holiday at work
  • mikewsmith
    Free Member

    As a general rule if “traditional holidays” need to be covered then it should be on a rota for everyone. For a lot of people christmas holidays are a time to catch up with family (parents etc). booking the year out on day 1 before anyone else gets a shot at the calendar is out of order too. Sob stories should also be reserved for real emergencies.

    stumpy01
    Full Member

    the-muffin-man – Member

    Childless people… if us parents didn’t have kids

    Perhaps some of the ‘childless people’ are not childless through choice…..and would love to be in your shoes.

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    you should try booking holiday at half term etc where i work, everyone else has kids, I don’t, but my OH is a teacher so we have to go away when the kids are off

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Perhaps some of the ‘childless people’ are not childless through choice…..and would love to be in your shoes.

    FFS – It was a comedy statement – if we’re throwing baby stories around I can put in 3 miscarriages, and 4 operations to our only child within a year.

    jfletch
    Free Member

    Whilst I agree with the OP that it is rediculous that he is being denied holiday to go to an event he has no control of, this attidude…

    If people choose to have kids the accompanying inconveniences are for them to put up with, not you.

    and it’s growth in society is a vile trend.

    Not only does it perpetrate the myth that having kids can only be a lifestyle choice for the well off but it is also a very short termist selfish attitude to take.

    I know it’s obvious but if people did not have kids then this country is up shit creek. Who is going to pay for your pensions, public services etc when you are too old a decrepid to work.

    cranberry
    Free Member

    Childless people… if us parents didn’t have kids there’d be no-one to fund your pensions, care packages and wipe your back-sides when you are pensioners!!

    I find that reference to this graph and a request that *their* little darlings pop around tomorrow morning with some Andrex generally shows up the lies in that sort of statement.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    and it’s growth in society is a vile trend.

    Not only does it perpetrate the myth that having kids can only be a lifestyle choice for the well off but it is also a very short termist selfish attitude to take.
    Perhaps there are things that are important and need to be respected, going away for a week isn’t one of them.

    stumpy01
    Full Member

    the-muffin-man – Member

    FFS – It was a comedy statement

    Oh yes, I missed the smiley face you put in……

    shifter
    Free Member

    Hey Weeksy – some people with six year olds will be actually at work on Christmas Day, not just on call 🙂

    weeksy
    Full Member

    shifter – Member

    Hey Weeksy – some people with six year olds will be actually at work on Christmas Day, not just on call

    Rubbish in-laws too hey 🙂

    lunge
    Full Member

    First come, first served here, booking is no more than 6 months in advance unless for “special circumstances” that mean it needs to be planned further ahead than that (weddings generally, not much else has passed that test). Very few parents are unreasonable about this, those that are get very short thrift.

    Like a few others on here, I don’t have kids but am married to a teacher so I have the some restrictions on holidays, I see no reason I shouldn’t have equal rights to those dates.

    chakaping
    Free Member

    Bemuses me how people make it through days at a time without bbeing battered senseless… I can only assume they’re not as arrogant in real life.

    I suspect many people use STW as an outlet for their frustrations with life and as a place to smear their unhappiness where their real life friends and family won’t have to witness it.

    Should be sympathetic, but it’s hard when some seem determined to be dicks about everything.

    grum
    Free Member

    I know it’s obvious but if people did not have kids then this country is up shit creek. Who is going to pay for your pensions, public services etc when you are too old a decrepid to work.

    Or… If people didn’t have kids then the planet might not be screwed. Bandying children around as if they’re part of some noble sacrifice for the good of society is fairly ridiculous.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Perhaps there are things that are important and need to be respected, going away for a week isn’t one of them.

    “Going away” has nothing to do with it. Spending time with your kids has everything to do with it. It can be at home, or abroad or wherever.

    Or… If people didn’t have kids then the planet might not be screwed.

    True, but it would also have no people on it.

    this attidude…is a vile trend

    No it’s not.

    Breeding is selfish.
    If you wanted kids for altruistic reasons, you’d adopt.

    soobalias
    Free Member

    what is this, rag week?

    there’s some selfish sods in here.

    well you aint wrong there buddy.

    weeksy
    Full Member

    I wanted mine just for picking up chicks at coffee mornings.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    as somebody once said in an office I worked in if you want all the time off your kids do, be a teacher. 8)

    hammyuk
    Free Member

    weeksy – Member
    I wanted mine just for picking up chicks at coffee mornings.

    Living in Spain when my eldest was born – I got BANNED from going anywhere with her on my own….
    Never seen a better way to be surrounded by lots of gorgeous women 🙂
    Not even the Andrex Puppy comes close!

    norbert-colon
    Full Member

    Why can’t everyone just try and get along nicely?

    That’s what I try and teach my kids 😉

    john_drummer
    Free Member

    if us parents didn’t have kids there’d be no-one to fund your pensions

    I fund my own pension thank you very much

    thestabiliser
    Free Member

    Imagine my surprise when I once had a minion ask me for time off to let his progeny ride a fat bike. You couldn’t make it up.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    As a general rule if “traditional holidays” need to be covered then it should be on a rota for everyone. For a lot of people christmas holidays are a time to catch up with family (parents etc). booking the year out on day 1 before anyone else gets a shot at the calendar is out of order too. Sob stories should also be reserved for real emergencies

    This, FCFS is nonsense.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    The fact your parents made sacrifices, financially, emotionally and physically is the only reason you even exist today !

    It wasn’t a sacrifice, it was what they wanted.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Breeding is selfish.
    If you wanted kids for altruistic reasons, you’d adopt.

    Can’t fault logic like that!!!!!!
    Crazyman 😆

    weeksy
    Full Member

    It wasn’t a sacrifice

    Says the man without kids 😉

    grum
    Free Member

    If we’re getting into silly hypothetical scenarios. I wouldn’t care if I’d never been born, because I would never have existed which is a prerequisite of caring about stuff.

    I’m grateful to my parents for bringing me up but not for creating me in the first place.

    MrSalmon
    Free Member

    a vile trend.

    Not only does it perpetrate the myth that having kids can only be a lifestyle choice for the well off but it is also a very short termist selfish attitude to take.
    Steady on. I don’t think nobody should ever have any kids. And I don’t think I ever suggested it should be a lifestyle choice for only the well off.

    I just don’t happen to think the fact that somebody has chosen to have kids means it’s more important that they get to go on holiday at a time that suits them. I don’t feel that I or anybody else needs to make any allowances for that beyond simple courtesy that I’d hope would be extended whatever the circumstances.

    weeksy
    Full Member

    I just don’t happen to think the fact that somebody has chosen to have kids means it’s more important that they get to go on holiday at a time that suits them

    They don’t necessarily go on holiday due to expense, however due to their child not being at school, they still have to take the time off either way at that particular time.

    CharlieMungus
    Free Member

    If you wanted kids for altruistic reasons, you’d adopt.

    Want to explain that a bit more and tell me a bit of your understanding of adoption?

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    they still have to take the time off either way at that particular time.

    I’m not aware of a legal requirement to take time off work when kids are off school, you need to organise their care but that’s it.

    thestabiliser
    Free Member

    I’m not aware of a legal requirement to attend the classics.

    Having said that going on holiday minus the children does sound tempting.

    glasgowdan
    Free Member

    Why the problem with people who ‘choose’ to have kids? You only exist because someone chose to have you. Being a parent is important, that can’t be ignored. The country SHOULD damn well make an effort to support those who care for infants/children (e.g. parents).

    I don’t agree that holidays should be given to parents just to save them a bit of cash during expensive periods though. However I feel they should be given priority over ‘normal’ holiday requests if there are genuine childcare issues such as being unable to find someone to watch the kids during a particular period. Much in the same way that anyone with genuine pressing needs should get priority.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Exactly both are things people would like to do, not everyone gets what they want.

    weeksy
    Full Member

    you need to organise their care but that’s it.

    @ £300-400 a week that’s quite expensive though.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    It’s something to consider, especially as you would be very lucky to get the 13-14 weeks of leave to cover all the time your kids are off. It still doesn’t mean you can have priority over somebody else for holiday time. Save the must have requests for when it’s really needed.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    @ £300-400 a week that’s quite expensive though.

    Not just that though is it? The school hols are the ONLY time of the year that parents will be able to go on holiday, or spend a decent amount of time with their kids. They are going to get shafted on pice to do so, but it’s literally their only chance.
    When nippers at school, you can be damn sure I’ll be booking my hols on the 1st january.

    edlong
    Free Member

    A couple of points:

    1) Re the OP

    apparently its discriminating against those with children

    is clearly nonsense and in fact the opposite is the case – the assertion is that the childless have less “dibs” on those dates so if there’s any discrimination going on, its against the childless.

    2) There seems to be a lot of confusion in this thread conflating the need for parents to book leave during school holidays and “going on holiday” with comments about how much that costs. Do those making those comments not understand that, for younger kids, the need to be on leave may well have nothing to do with “going on holiday” and everything to do with the fact that the kids can’t just be left at home alone to fend for themselves and so, in households were all the adults are in work, someone’s going to have to take leave to look after them?

    Same with the comment a page or two back moaning about parents needing time off at short notice if their kids have “a sniffle” or something – what are they supposed to do? If the school sends a seven year old home poorly, they need an adult there, don’t they? You can’t just tell the school no one’s coming to pick them up until normal time because work are being a bit sniffy about it. And lots of schools have policies about not allowing kids back for a certain period. If my youngest pukes in the dinner hall today, they won’t let her back in school tomorrow. Either me or the wife is going to be at home tomorrow then. Employers have to be reasonable about this (legal requirement).

    None of which goes anywhere near justifying banning of leave for the childless during school holidays, as appears to be the OP’s situation btw.

    jfletch
    Free Member

    Steady on. I don’t think nobody should ever have any kids. And I don’t think I ever suggested it should be a lifestyle choice for only the well off.

    That is what is implied in the statement made which basically boils down to “you had ’em so they’re your problem”.

    Having kids is part of society and our society should be set up to enable people to have children. I’m not suggesting it’s not at the moment. And the balance has obviously been skewed the other way in the OPs scenario.

    But threads like these bring out the most vile options from some people and it apprears to be a gowing antisocial trend and therefore deserves to be spoken about in harsh terms.

    jamj1974
    Full Member

    Like anything else – consideration is where it is at. Being thoughtful and flexible should be our default mode IMHO. As a parent I wouldn’t suggest that parents should come first with holiday requests and haven’t expected that myself. I can honestly say I’ve walked the walk on this one.

    People without children might want to consider that without parents and children the economic and social systems would grind to a halt. Choosing to be a parent isn’t necessarily a selfish choice – it’s a more often selfless choice that requires a lot of sacrifice. Every time you use a service you are being served by someones offspring. Without these future adults who will look after you when you are in your dotage…?

    Be considerate. Be thoughtful. Care about others and their needs as well as your own. Life is honestly better for all of us that way.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 146 total)

The topic ‘Parental priority over booking holiday at work’ is closed to new replies.