Nice win, looks fun.
Is that a road specific lens?
They say so. Yet I think it’s just a sort of ‘softening’ of the upper beam area to reduce dazzle.
From product webpage:
Anti-glare lens designforroad cyclists where the beam softens to avoid blindingoncomingmotorists. Side lighting for better side visibility.
And
The RN 3000 provides up to 3000 lumens on 12 levels. Supported by the scattering optics, it spreads a lateral light field with an opening angle of around 150 °. The advantage is obvious: full depth illumination up to 260m, good lateral illumination limited in height.
https://www.magicshine.de/en-gb/rn-3000
I just took a peek at my Raveman (PR900) to compare lenses
The main/road-specific emitter on LHS has quite a lot of lens-y-pokery going on. In use it’s quite a distinct cutoff and the even spread over ground level is striking. I’ve not used an StVZO bike light to compare, but it’s far and away a different (positive) experience on roads and gravel than any other light I’ve owned.
The light in the OP looks like it could be great for gravel/MTB use and ‘get home’ on low beam (?), look fwd to some test reports 😉
*edit: Guy Kestevan just reviewed it this week:
https://www.bikeperfect.com/reviews/magicshine-rn3000-light-review